Disproof of General Relativity

[anon]

God? Where is God?

[seepingin]

He’s busy expanding at the moment, anon. I will take your calls for now though.

[anon]

@seepingin

Psybang didn’t contend my point. In fact, right after we suggested that there is no SIZE to the universe, he just made the statement that it is “irrelevant to the size of the universe”. See how he thinks of the universe in terms of size??? We JUST pointed out that the universe has no size, and he then his mind cannot comprehend it.

I think you have a point here. But what then? What are you saying about the kind of knowledge provided through measurement?

[seepingin]

Knowledge gained through measurement is abstract and temporal, based on utility and not metaphysical certitude. The latter does not beong to science but to philosophy, or religion.

[seepingin]

Knowledge gained through measurement is formal.

[anon]

@seepingin

Knowledge gained through measurement is abstract and temporal, based on utility and not metaphysical certitude. The latter does not beong to science but to philosophy, or religion.

Ah, ok.

Of what things can I be metaphysically certain?

[seepingin]

Nothings

[anon]

Nice. Not boring.

[jonquil]

@seepingin

I’m sorry to destroy your dreams and burst your bubble of science, my good friend. Perhaps science is not the answer you should be seeking, but God instead???

Hehheh. But what if the expanding universe is God? Not meaning to burst bubbles here, especially if they’re expanding ones.

[seepingin]

We can be certain of what we rule OUT, not in.

[seepingin]

It wouldn’t make a difference to General Relativity, jonquil, if the universe were God or God were the univese. Either way, General Relativity is OUT.

[jonquil]

@seepingin

It wouldn’t make a difference to General Relativity, jonquil, if the universe were God or God were the univese. Either way, General Relativity is OUT.

Absolutement, mon ami. Relativitie est un petit problème pour les imbéciles scientifiques mais pas pour Dieu.

jonquille, l’idiot religieux

[seepingin]

LOL, don’t go using General Relativity in religious arguments and you’ll be fine joquil.

[James_S_Saint]

@seepingin

Nothings

Emm… well, there went you God theory.

[seepingin]

Actually it fits perfectly, since most people conceive God as ‘nothing’.

God is not a thing we can touch, smell, see, hear, feel, etc. So God, by communal definition, is Nothing.

Nothing is not a thing a person can “know”, hence God, as He is omnipotent and omniscient.

[jonquil]

@seepingin

LOL, don’t go using General Relativity in religious arguments and you’ll be fine joquil.

Mais non, seeping des imbeciles scientifiques. Relativitie est le produit d’un esprit très fin – appelez-le un dieu ou Albert Einstein. À moi ils sont identiques.

See Einstein or God here:

[thesociologist]

Very good but, surely the two distances between two objects can go further away from each other, it doesn’t have to expand away from something.

[jonquil]

@thesociologist

Very good but, surely the two distances between two objects can go further away from each other, it doesn’t have to expand away from something.

Also, would you notice that you were moving if everything else was moving at the same pace in all directions? This s h o u l d be a duh moment for some people.

[apaosha]

If you put a marble in a balloon and inflated the balloon, would the marble expand with the balloon?

[seepingin]

If an inflated ego is an inflated balloon, and you pop it with a needle, then does its brain explode too?