washington.edu/news/2013/12/ … etic-code/
I had a suspicion that DNA contains more information than people realize.
It may even be invisible, like programmed energy.
The article is not about any invisible energy though, it is about the molecules.
What the Earth is the standard here Dan. You kicked my post because it was “Minor” to the sandbox. Now I see this far less substantial post that you put in the science forum.
Why didn’t you put it in the sandbox?
I think you really kicked my post because you don’t want people to believe in the Internet as a God, not because it is minor. It is not minor. This is minor. Its only a link.
A) Dan isn’t the moderator here.
B) Dan kicked your post to the sandbox because of its obvious lack of sincerity and not really even related to what a religion is.
If you want to declare a religion to discuss, make sure it actually is a religion or at very least that there is a degree of sincerity in your beliefs concerning it being a religion. You accomplished neither, yielding what appeared to be merely playful sarcasm belonging in a sandbox.
I kind of object to this kind of wording;
The DNA has no “codes” whatsoever. People assign coding to molecular sequences for their own use. Apparently they have discovered that the coding they had been assigning has a double implication concerning the outcome of the species. In short, it was a poor coding method, hiding significant information and tempting presumption. Nature didn’t assign the genetic codes, nor does it care about what Man surmises in his attempts to codify what it does.
The main content and subject is in the url. My post under the url is minor.
barbarianhorde, you seem offended and upset, even though I told you twice I didn’t want to upset you. I’ll even apologize. But why so pissed about such a small issue?