If logic can be free of expectation, but pattern (reality) requires expectation, does this prove that logic and reality are in conflict with one another?
It has then found a perfect home at ILP.
Logic is not reality and so can only be in conflict with non-reality.
If logic is not reality, that means logic is anti-reality.
An apple is not an orange but that does not mean apple is anti orange.
Apples and oranges might not apply to logic. In which case, assuming fruit is because of rules and principles, logic is anti-rules.
Sorry Shelly, I don’t understand your reply.
What does the latter have to do with the former?
Energy is the name of the game here.