The Mongols were primarily driving out the Khazars (“Czar”) from Asia. Both were ruthless requiring the other to be ruthless. The khazars ended up losing out and restored their reign in Eastern Europe as the Bolsheviks, Transylvanians, Gregorians and so forth to eventually become today’s Ashkenazi Jews and Zionists following Marxism to rule Israel and the USA. Their rules in both cases is simply, “there are no rules”.
They sound emancipative? Why are they evil?
Is that an unbroken line? And since when did Marxists rule the USA?
so what if they do? the USA is multicultural, why does it matter if individuals from one ‘race’ or another rule, and is it that?
Apparently many people/ethnicities can trace their ancestry back to Mongolia/The Asiatic Steps, so they were just spreading their love… interspersed with war - the strong will always want to conquer the weak until they themselves are gotten the better of…
So the strong become the weak and get beat by the former week. Seams pointless but I suppose it keeps the entirety strong, or does it make it weak? Are we stronger now than the mongols and their contemporaries were?
Arent we the weak who have found technological ways to beat the strong
Why have you conjured up what you think I meant when I said “until the strong are gotten the better of” - that could be by whatever means necessary, regardless of who has the superior natural strength.
Since 1913 (arguably since 1910).
It is called, “Master/slave morality”. That is why.
You might want to read a little of their mandates and agendas before worshiping them.
It was about dividing and conquering then as it is now. Nothing much has changed.
Only difference is that they’re more effective at it now.
With respect to the fed reserves act, pushed through by the Jews during Christmas when other parties were not present [so they say]. Yet essentially that brought the USA in line with general banking, same with the deregulation of the banks that brought the world in line with that idea, which led to the credit crunch. …do any of us get any say in all of this, or are they decisions universally made?
I don’t, I just said that because the notion is ‘out there’. I am not sure if its any particular party [e.g. Jews or English moneymen], more than a general consensus.
If it were up to me I’d let globalism occur naturally rather than force it, I want that freedom, but I think its being exploited. The result is seen and made to occur prematurely, and that means we get a false result. We could live in a totally different and more free world, but perhaps the powers that be have seen that and are attempting to ‘make’ it happen, rather than let it happen ~ two completely different outcomes for me. though one can see the need for speed as far as the Jews are concerned, that is if even the holocaust wasn’t somewhat contrived.
Gentlemen! I already have a thread on the Jewish federal reserve or zionism in general. Let us not ruin this thread. 