# Does this look right?

**URL:** https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/does-this-look-right/49455
**Category:** Philosophy
**Created:** [January 8, 2024, 8:47pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/does-this-look-right/49455 "2024-01-08T20:47:01Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/user_avatar/www.ilovephilosophy.com/ichthus77/32/446_2.png) [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77)
#### Post date: [March 30, 2024, 1:30am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/does-this-look-right/49455/10 "2024-03-30T01:30:02Z")

</div>

Relevant. Click the down arrow to get to the conversation with Copilot:

> [@Modal Logic Question](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/modal-logic-question/49320/48):
>
> Imagine if you didn’t need to do trial and error because you imagined things right/beautiful/necessary (& thus possible) the first/meta time? Anywhayz. I just had a glorious chat with Bing Copilot about Kant’s ought implies can (the crux of graded absolutism) and Hare’s ought implies imperative (the crux of Kierkegaard’s Subjectivity is Truth)… Some scribblies:

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/does-this-look-right/49455)._