material (ontological/ontic import) cause is the boards (mind), vs formal/final (essential/thetic import) cause is the blueprints in the mind, vs efficient (existential/deontic import) cause is the mind(s) (re)placing boards to actualize/maintain blueprint
to say “not true right now means not true ever” is a part whole fallacy (composition: modo hoc)
+/-=+/- is the correct starting philosophy for the cosmos….because it’s the only philosophy that creates vibration N/S=N/S and binary code 0/1=0/1 and explains consciousness in/out = in/out (in/out of the moment consciousness states).
What came first (what is ontologically prior substance?), the category (ontology) or its members/examples (existantiation/action)? If we do not allow for an empty category (we must always ask “What referent populates this category?”), or for a category-less member/example (we must always ask, “What category is this populating?”) the answer has to be both, and the category is “merely” essential (to the observer) “until” it is both (actually, all three: category/substance, member/example/action, essence/property/force). Only to one observer is every example never “merely” essential. This observer does not merely observe from the outside, because this observer is in alignment with its observation (as a whole), which would not exist otherwise (all change subsumed in and reconciling back to the unchanging wholeness that is in all change). A true description of this (incl. a definition of The Good) does not abstract away from it & make it (the ground of The Good) superfluous; abstracting away from reality only happens when there is no referent. It’s not a mere abstraction (which would be a divergence/alienation from reality) — just a distinction [a respecting of otherness is required in unification—otherwise you are just two/three storms that cancel each other out, or one/two ends up destroying the other(s)]. Our capacity for the maximally great mirrors God’s fullness of the maximally great. We are never completely empty of the fullness — that would be an absence of existence (nothing). Rather, we are made in the image of wholeness, and cannot stay/flow wholeness (the only infinite gain that does not self/other-destruct) apart from it.
Observer/Observed is binary.
Observer/Observed=Observer/Observed.
There is no life in binary.
Give up Ichthus….you are wasting your time.
Life is a yes/no binary that is on a spectrum, just like everything else. But you can’t have absolute no for anything.
Sorry, I forgot the language until last night. Or was it this morning? I have to get ready to go do something fun with my moms.
…because I’m not an asshole.
It’s about existence or life Ichthus…It’s possible to claim stuff in the cosmos and not possess life.There is no life in binary.You need to be separated from it.
It’s not alive if it doesn’t exist. And merely existing doesn’t mean it’s as alive as it could be. That requires consent.
Mere survival is not thriving.
Merely is existing means it’s not alive at all….full stop.There no life in existence or non existence.
There’s a little spark that never goes away. The stone in the shoe.
No…Ichthus….there is no life in existence or non existence…..
Ziltch!!!
Existence/None Existence=Existence/Non Existence
Existence and Non Existence is binary!!!
You need to exist to claim that you don’t exist.It doesn’t mean you possess life…
yes/no quality (life, force)
do/don’t action (existence as verb)
true/false substance (that STILLness)
go
fight
win
how dare you
You will go around and around the hamsters wheel with binary Ichthus.
The whole of the physical is founded upon a BINARY SCIENTIFIC DESIGN!!!
Absolutely everything VIBRATES right up to the consciousness level experience.
You have to be separated from binary.
I hate to break this to you, but… I think you might be on the spectrum.
You haven’t a clue about anything Ichthus…..by your own admission you will be jumping over the fence into the sheep fold with your “goodies” remember, proving that you have misunderstood….You remain totally in the dark.
There are 4 stages to Awareness/Unawareness
1.Unawareness/Unawareness
2.Awareness/Unawareness
3.Unawareness/Awareness
4.Awareness/Awareness
You are still stuck on item 1. because you’re unaware that you are unaware….that’s your problem.
I’m aware that you’re unaware that I’m aware that you’re aware that I’m aware.
Really….lol….so why are you unaware that you shouldn’t jump over the fence into the sheepfold then?….clearly you are not aware at all.
Why are you trying to mindtrick the Jedi, Bugs Bunny?
I know you are an theist Ichthus…If you’re going to go the party make sure you wear the right clothing.
I know your grammar sucks.
Haha….is that all you can pick up on…You think you are a theist but you’re an atheists in reality Ichthus…..that is why you are unaware that you are unaware.It’s your theistic religion that sucks.
Anyone who thinks they can jump over the fence into the sheepfold might be a genuine believer in God….but it will do them no good….genuine atheists are not remotely interested in going to the party so they won’t be gate crashing the party will they.
Mathew 7:21-23
