Duke Nukem is an evil misogynist.

I am Anita Sarkeesian, I work for the Catholic Atheist Society and I approve of this message.

In the game Duke Nukem forever, at the beginning of the game, Duke gets a blow job from 2 women. This is incredibly offensive. Duke should not be allowed to have sex with women, it is sexist to show a man having sex with women. If a man has sex with women it is objectification of women. Men having sex with women is downright evil. Its related to male power fantasies.

Videogames like Duke Nukem are evil, because they promote men to have power fantasies about having sex with women. Men should not be allowed to think or fantasize about having sex or power, because it causes a slippery slope. If men think about sex or power, they might actually try to have it one day, which inevitably results in wars, rape and school shootings.
In fact, men should not have any power at all.

In Duke Nukem, it is not enough that Duke has to pay women to have sex with him, and that Duke has to pay money in exchange for soliticing sexual goods from women, implying that Duke has no sexual value to women outside of his money. Women don’t have enough power that they can extort money from Duke in exchange for sexual goods. High class prostitutes are not manipulators, but rather they are the same as low class prostitutes, destitute and with no other option, they are literally victims of the Patriarchy. Therefore, Duke is the real manipulator, by paying money to have sex with them.

If any man tries to seduce or compell a woman to have sex with him, he is an evil psychological manipulator. Women are not psychological manipulators by dressing in sexualized clothes, or putting on makeup, or flirting and teasing every man with no intent of even the slightest commitment. Women may be fickle and disloyal to men, as well as flirt with no intention of commitment, and dress completely naked and wear seductive lipstick, this is the natural way of things and female empowerment, there is nothing manipulative about this. After all, how can it be manipulation when our bodies are half-naked and exposed, for all to see?

In fact, men should not be allowed to try to seduce a woman to have sex with him at all. He must keep silent, waiting for women to come to him, because flirting with a woman in public is absolutely rude and eeriely close to dreaded catcalling. After about 20 years of isolation, the man will probably eventually get his first kiss from a woman, and before he hits 30 he will probably lose his virginity, if he just waits patiently enough for the right girl to find him. Men who flirt with women, also known as “pick up artists”, are lowlife scum, and they should be locked in various basements like the scum they are.

They should be locked in basements because they are a menace to society. They are a menace because they are men who desire power. Men should not be allowed to desire power, nor should they be able to have a sex drive. Having a sex drive, or desiring power, inevitably leads to violence, and it is all that is wrong with the world. It is not our fault that men desire power. So what if we ignored them in highschool, so what if they have no friends, and women ignore and ignore and ignore them again, and they feel powerless to get what they want. We all have our burdens. For instance, I tried to marry a filthy rich man for his money, and yet he rejected me. So men deserve to be rejected over and over again, I didn’t desire to have power over the rich man, and so why do men feel entitled to have power over women who constantly ignore and ignore them again? It’s a free country, women don’t owe them anything. Men should stop complaining, and stop wishing they had more power, men already have enough privileges as it is.

Any man who is not content with being ignored over and over again should be locked in the basement because they are a menace to society. Obviously such a man is not rich, and it’s their fault they aren’t rich because it’s a free country and every man in this country has patriarchy privileges and can easily make a six figure income if he simply applies himself. This is America, land of the rich. Obviously if he had more money, golddiggers like me would be trying to marry him for his money, and so obviously it’s his fault that women aren’t swarming at his door. But there is another problem of society besides just men wanting to have sex or loving relationships with women. It’s how violent men are.

This is definitely a slippery slope issue, and like the idea of sexy women in videogames, badly needs to be changed. One of the big reasons men should not have sexual power over women, is because that means they have control of their genes, and their genes allow to pass on, rather than die off. If they pass on their genes this could be a threat to society itself. They might make a woman give birth to a videogame designer, who might potentially make violent games, which would lead to males thinking violent thoughts. It’s a slippery slope. Violent thoughts and fantasies lead to potential wars, school shootings, and rape. We must prevent the thought from ever occuring in the first place. Videogames must not have any violence in it, with must have a world full of games about depression and tranquility, with no graphics or sound, we must not even have Mario because people die in Mario. Same with final fantasy, because it promotes fantasies of power, which is evil. Fantasies of power inevitably lead to rape fantasies, sexwithwomen fantasies, or transgender fantasies.

Transgender fantasies are not as evil as rape fantasies, but they are still evil because they are objectification of women. Men should not be allowed to have sex changes, because it instills the notion that vaginas have more value than penises, essentially “putting the pussy on the pedestal”, which is pure misogyny. Sex changes make the vagina into an object of value, something to be coveted, strived for, and used, when in reality, vaginas are really just piles of flesh, equal to penises. Crossdreaming is sexist objectification of women. If a transsexual has a sexual fantasy of them being a woman and having sex, it is evil misogyny, because it uses the female body as a sexual entity, and it is extremely objectifying and utterly sexist. Getting breast implants is objectification of women, and evil, same with getting a sex change or any kind of cosmetic bodily enhancements. We approve of transgenders, but only in the sense of men putting on women’s clothes, having gay sex and talking effeminately. We do not actually approve of men objectifying women by getting bodily modifications which objectify the female form. That topic is done, so let’s get back to the topic of rape.

Rape is even more evil than sex, because it is a combination of sex and violence. You didn’t think it could get any more evil than sex or violence, but it just did, because rape is sex+violence. Rape is the prime evil, but consentual sex can be the prime evil too. For instance, if a man has sex with a 17 year old 1 day before her 18th birthday, it is abhorrently evil, but one day later he can have sex with her and it’s absolutely fine and A ok. Canadians are evil pedophiles, like Jared Fogle, because having sex with a seventeen year old is morally no different than filming six year old child pornography. For this reason, we praise assexual men, like teenagers who refuse to have sex with hot 30 year old teachers, because having sex with your hot teacher is inherently morally wrong, and if you do it, you will have PTSD for the rest of your life. it is better to be an angry, angsty, depressed and suicidal 20 year old virgin who is sexually frustrated, than to have sex with your hot teacher, because that means you are a good upstanding citizen.

Being fat is not wrong or evil, even though it means more animals had to die for no reason to feed them. It is evil to make fun or offend fat people, or warn them of the health dangers, because it is impolite. It is also evil to depict healthy and attractive females in videogames. Women depicted as healthy and attractive, with womanly bodies, this is offensive and objectification of women, because it paints a false picture of young girls to want to try to have healthy bodies. Instead young girls should be realistic about their bodies, and strive to be fat and obese. Also, the women in the game didn’t have lopsided breasts, which is damaging to the ego’s of many women who have lopsided, or aesthetically displeasing breasts, and so it is all the more evil, more patriarchy brainwashing of making men to be attracted to aesthetically pleasing bodies.

I am Anita Sarkeesian and I approve of this message.

Why? Sex is natural and we all do it. I do think we shouldn’t sexualise others ~ not all the time, but it annoys me cos men are always getting caught out by this, like the sports star who got done for flirting with a woman. A person is a person first, and a potential or actual sexual partner second, so I can understand why some women don’t want to be sexualised all the time. On the other hand as a child brought up in the seventies, it was a highly sexualised time and many things were accepted [like finding schoolgirls attractive], and people were having random sex all over the shop. I don’t remember that as being a bad time, it was a lot freer and us poor men were always being snipped at. You have no idea what a simple word or sentence can do to fuck up a man’s life, as females get it all their way atm and men just keep getting tons of shit.
The world isn’t perfect, so society should stop pretending it is. Mostly these things appear to be used as part of some inane agenda, and I find them ultimately insincere.

Patriarchy.