deleted
deleted
Like, what? I don’t understand. Solve? Its just an experimental fact!
Contribute or step out of the way–there’s work to be done!!!
(Half-joking.)
Do you know what Conceptual Knowledge is?
Well, yes, but I still don’t understand. What the equation means isn’t a matter of what you or I feel about it. It just describes mathematically a physically detectable fact: that mass and energy are really mass-energy.
These are mere “words” that have particular meanings in subjective-objective contexts. Science and physics are often confused as religions in their own rights. It just depends on the meanings of the words and contexts.
Again, you should be giving me your definitions rather than explaining this phenomenon. This post is about solving Einstein’s definition for the eventual creation of four-dimensional thought… I would not like to divert it so early.
Begin a new thread if you would like to discuss these things with me there.
If I am using mere “words”, then you are using mere “nonsense”.
Nice metaphor; contribute or leave.
What are you trying to do here? If you can’t give a good explanation, then non-sense is right. It’s like that guy over in the natural sciences board. Too many people try to construct pseudo-theories off of some simple results of physics, and they look totally ridiculous because they don’t have a clue.
deleted
deleted