Egalitarianism

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

Without the illusion of egalitarianism morality and ethics would not be able to perpetuate their mythological or meta narrative existence. Both subjects would fail to make their mythological presence be known without it.

In a matter of quality where does egalitarianism exist in modern or any historical society again?

The funny thing is that after 2900 years of human history or more I can’t seem to find one existence of reference when it concerns the existence of egalitarianism.

Puzzling… Does this mean that morals and ethics don’t really exist after all?

I need somebody to explain all of this complex stuff to me. What I need is some sort of expert to tell me what I need to think.

If morality and ethics don’t really exist beyond preposterous absurd positioning that both do exist, what does all of this really mean?

2

Ethics? You don’t have any rules you live by? No principles whatsoever? No sense of friendship and loyalty to anyone??

Why do I doubt that?

3

There is only what you can do and what you can’t. Everything else is irrelevant.

It all revolves around situational or existential ability. Nothing more and nothing less.