# Einstein's philosophy **URL:** https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/einsteins-philosophy/80454 **Category:** Philosophy **Created:** [August 30, 2024, 1:05am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/einsteins-philosophy/80454 "2024-08-30T01:05:10Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 31
### Author: ![Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/user_avatar/www.ilovephilosophy.com/ichthus77/32/446_2.png) [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77) #### Post date: [April 4, 2025, 10:50am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/einsteins-philosophy/80454/31 "2025-04-04T10:50:19Z")
Read: > **[Bergson Was Right about Relativity (well, partly)! | Reasonable Faith](https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/scholarly-writings/divine-eternity/bergson-was-right-about-relativity-well-partly)** > > Introduction > > The meteoric fall of Henri Bergson from the philosophical pantheon of the twentieth century was doubtless due in part to his misguided critique, or rather... Compare: > **[McTaggart-UnrealityTime-1908.pdf](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Uvahw0GFp-JtCVpz1SCDyt8KmoXrwHkM/view?usp=drivesdk)** > > Google Drive file. Revise? > [@TIME: Revisiting McTaggart's C Series](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/time-revisiting-mctaggarts-c-series/49140): > > (Preface: The word “ultimate” below is also said “irreducible” by others in similar contexts.) This is an excerpt from McTaggart’s “The Unreality of Time” – a source often quoted by those explicating A and B Theory. Link is at the end to read more of it. All of it? Not sure. Question: Can “unreality” in the title be synonymous with (or defer to) ideality or idea? My next question is - Is this not a dialectic? Is this not a more complete version of Cameron’s (2015) moving (versus stuck) spotlig… Where I’m at… sort of… > [@On the impossibility of knowing a true tenseless fact without omnitemporality](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/on-the-impossibility-of-knowing-a-true-tenseless-fact-without-omnitemporality/81104/9): > > Jabberwock replied, and my replies are below each of his: Jabberwock replies: If you agree with the definition, then your view supports eternalism and not presentism (which is required, as Craig wrote, for Kalam). If the timeblock is essentially eternal, then it is, as Craig points out, meaningless to state that the universe ‘came into being’. The tape measure does not ‘come into being’ at its beginning, it is simply a dimensional edge/direction. I replied: [@Jabberwock](https://knowwhyyoubelieve.org/members/jabberwock/) I think it’s probably … --- _[View the full topic](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/einsteins-philosophy/80454)._