Ethics of Executing Midgets

Midgets have little necks, head close to the shoulder, hard to cut off. Impossible? No, but prior to the guillotine, very difficult.

Likewise, their body is thick and robust, much more than a child’s, a abnormal amount of thick tendons and muscles, and fully grown adult like spines.

This would throw off any hangman trying to calculate a load drop for a midget, because it isn’t like the everyday task of hanging a ferral child… they weigh much more, but are similar height, but no similar structure… much more hardy and robust.

Same goes for firing squad. If standing, a midget stands lower, and so the firing squad has to aim low. They don’t know if he has a tiny heart, or normal sized heart. Will it hit him, miss, will they shit him in the chin or neck by accident instead if the chest? If seated, in a execution chair, he has to be given a high chair. The straps are all oversized, making a mockery of him. This all amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.

If it us cruel to execute a midget in the 19th century or prior, then such precedent shows us it remains so today. So, this means midgets can’t be executed.

However, we ate all equal before the law. If a midget can be executed, then nobody can be executed.

This means the death penalty is immoral and unethical, and should be banned.

Once in place, it gives us the freedom, without fears of lethal reprisals, to kill midgets in cold blood.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=o8ZnCT14nRc

But this brings us back to the problem of how to kill them. I must say, however, that I find it hard to believe that it is beyond us to come up with an efficient yet ethical way of dispatching a midget.

It appears Midgetism is a evolutionary adaptation, to remain ethically immune to execution.

Survival of the fittest. Darwin saw this coming.

If that were the case the majority of the human race would be midgets.

Perhaps we are. How would we know?

We can’t be midgets, as we are relatively easy to execute.

Perhaps originally it was easier to execute our ancestors than it is now?

And women outnumber men, and are far smaller. They can be considered midgets relativistically, if absent a artificial standard. They rarely are executed.

Now you are sick! Sick dogs! Bow-wow! I want candy!

Relevant content: Executions are wrong. Zombie worlds are better. Ha! That’s irony you can smoke in your pipes!

Trolls,

Stop! the murder of innocent beings

Are midgets inately born with innocence, or is it something acquired over time? What bearing does this have in regards to killing them, especially the difficulty of doing so Ethically?

Nature vs Nurture

I have nothing against midgets. I have often fantasized what it would be like to fuck a midget woman myself.

It’s on my to do list before I die. Still, technically you can justify killing just about anybody.

I hope this has been helpful in the aid of the thread subject.

Justifying and ethically pulling it off without unusual cruelity are two very separate things.

If you’re going to go about killing people, why are you concerned about doing it humanely? :-k

Because we all are human by nature. Best to do your midget killing humanely, just like we do with animals. It is what separates us from them.

Humane forms of killing has always struck me as being absurd.

It is because your a Compulsively Naysaying Nihilist, and can’t grasp Ethics.

I grasp morality and ethics just fine as a giant absurd joke.

See, my point exactly.