.
[size=123]NSFW - If you are a female member of ILovePhilosophy - WATCH THIS VIDEO[/size]
[size=112]
Philosophically - this video is pretty much dead nuts ON.
My thesis for this thread: This is How Women Should Treat Their Men [/size]
.
I’ll go ahead and summarize the video. Good lookin chick created a video on facebook, she basically says women in relationships should suck more dick and complain less.
Every man’s perfect fantasy woman - reduced to nothing more than a sex toy.
youtube.com/watch?v=0MsySesdisE
.
[size=150]THAT is a GREAT video![/size]
[size=112]
Thank you for adding.[/size]
.
I’m not clicking it, but I assume you’re talking about Jenna Marbles. She has a lot of good advice.
No, just a no name chick. She didn’t even post it on youtube.
Go figure Bill would use some b-grade advice chick.
Jenna Marbles kills me, that bitch is hilarious.
Can’t say she’s all that wrong, all I could say being a virgin and a person who never had sex is, it works both ways. When someone grants you freedom, the other partner will do so, it’s all about mutually doing something. Sure it’s not a hard and fast rule, some guys like being controlled, some girls do. Fundamentally though it’s all about learning respect, do that hoodoo that you do so well, and it may well come back in cunny lingus or at worst spades. It really is not rocket science, relationships I think are about mutual understanding. Don’t fuck your man off, but if she doesn’t fuck you off don’t fuck her off either. 
Trite but true. Obvious but few people have any common sense. Just the very fact that woman had to state the obvious, although not entirely rightly is evidence that some people are fucking idiots.
“Every boy’s fantasy woman.” perhaps.
A Man has higher standards.
For 98% of grown men, sex still = love, and in a more literal and pure sense than it is for a woman (explaining why it is not unusual for a man to marry ex-prostitutes and mail-order brides). Anyway, this girl seems to be reinforcing (re-affirming?) the idea that men like to see women mostly as sexual objects, and thus, women should go ahead and act so, which, in turn brings women themseves to (pun intended): youtube.com/watch?v=LtbSthgYh0U
The typical false illusion is that men actually “prefer” what you see them immediately be attracted to.
Men first are attracted to obvious things like sex, beauty, health, and so on. And quite often, being this generation of retarded males, they marry that. But the issue is really one of what is it that they actually like in the long run, down deeper, and more lasting. The male is a strategic creature far more so than the female, merely less deceptive.
Typically, again in this generation, males have no idea. But that doesn’t mean that it isn’t there to be discovered. And how do they discover it? Like they discover everything, by doing everything imaginable wrong first, just to make sure. So of course, you are going to get a lot of stats that imply that males like X or Y, when in fact, those are merely the exaggerated surface illusion. What they really want to keep and hold is Z.
Males are born with the ability to fool females and vsvrsa. That is how mating works. It takes more serious thought to realize what is actually going on and what does or doesn’t really work in the long run. Simple-minded “X likes Y” is simply non-sense being used to inspire reactions from those listening.
And btw, I have yet to find an older woman who disagrees.
.
[size=112]
I didn’t know that this video was a spoof until about 2:minutes into it.[/size]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtbSthgYh0U[/youtube]
[size=112]
The remainder of the time in the video really creeped me out… Genuinely unsettling. Go figure.[/size]
.
You’re not serious, are you? About not knowing that was a spoof?
I agree. But don’t ffs play mind games with your man or woman, it doesn’t work, just learn to accept that no man or woman is you, that’s the reason you are with them in the first place, two sexes fill in the blanks, two sexes make a whole, why ruin that with your hangups?
.
[size=112]
Yes…yes I am serious. I did not know it was a spoof until about the 2:minute mark. Even then I wasn’t totally sure. The last sentence or two was the stopper for me.
But what was more strange for me is how uncomfortable I felt watching the rest of the video. And I can’t identify the reason.
Seriously. As I saw your reply to the thread I was actually feeling uncomfortable because I had watched the second video about 40 minutes before…
I’m talking about the video that is like a interview - on a TV channel.[/size]
[size=115]
I still feel weird… It’s not going away.[/size]
[size=50]…[/size]
.
A woman as an advisor has functioned pretty good for millions of years, including that sexual part. The problem comes up when a woman requires equality and non-sexuality. This is a double crime.
I know such women. They become even sexual and emotional offenders just to reach their social status of a man. They must become sexually totally cold in order to feel equal. In the end they say “I don’t know what I am, a man or a woman”.
To be honest, as I always am in critical situations, modern women don’t even dare to compete in anything. They don’t even like other women that much, now guess why?
Modern women are just machines who do what they have been said by an “authority” never mind how senseless this may be, regardless on anything.
It is a dictated position of a woman. But she never thinks about the purpose. If the authority says now all women shall kill themselves because life is unjust, they will do it. They suffer too much from life to be able to live it purposely.
Democracy is the slow end of the human being. We can not register any attributes of it in the whole human history, because it eats itself up.
For me, love = when people make up statistics.
Yes, that would be interesting, to see a woman who is able to love to expose her own statistics.
A woman which uses her head to dominate among men is certainly not interested in submission to men. And since love is either domination or submission … you know.
“How does one love something that is not alive.”
Doesn’t have to be alive, just alive enough.