The ultimate cop-out - say someone is ‘too emotional’ to debate with.
That’s right, you can’t refute my facts. I’ve provided you perfectly logical and sound facts for you and you refuse to comment.
Now, back to my theory.
Everything is gravity.
Your scenario is impossible, and I’ve explained why in my last post, that’s why I didn’t say anything direct about it. I went straight to the source of your scenario and found the gaping holes in your logic. There was no reason to address something that was already proven wrong by default.
If energy and matter are interchangeable forms of the same thing, and when matter is converted to energy it has no mass, it can be any size.
The mass that makes up Planets and Stars, you and i, would therefore be able to be converted to energy/force and take up no room at all.
Fundamental particles are therefore an incorrect concept, the four forces are mass less but energy/force is still something, i.e. not nothing. (They are the strong and weak nuclear forces the electromagnetic force and gravitation) The first particles to be made when energy converts to matter may form the building blocks for everything, but no thing made of matter can be said to be fundamental if it is all made from these forces.
Thought is an energy/force like the other four energy/forces that takes up no room, but it is not nothing either. I would assume that the first thoughts were a binary code; off and on, and evolved from there. Thought at this level seems to have something in common with a charge i.e. 0 & 1 is like + & -.
Maybe all matter is therefore just little packets/loops of this force/energy that have combined, and finding an equilibrium between + & - have stabilized, naturally being able to resist being converted back to non-matter, becoming the elements.
A loop has no beginning and no end, could this be the nature of matter?
Using mathematics has enabled physicists to discover some amazing potentialities that before remained hidden. Then the engineers figure out how to actualize these potentialities. The use of mathematics has enabled us to bring to presence what we previously knew nothing about. It has been a most wonderful endeavor.
Those who do not like the reductions usually stay in the empty clouds of generalization. They definitely stay close to the primitive everday nature of the earth, but they never go beyond and explore the wider universe of possibilities.
The moral indignation directed against reductionism is an age old view held by bigots. Some people are just too afraid to lose their power. They are afraid that they will lose their constructed egos if parts are found within the identities. This fear is irrational. Your identity will still presence itself to you through all the parts.
Greater knowledge is gained when you view from all levels, all powers of the microscope. To stay at the boundary surface is to miss out on a lot, just as to zoom in at the tiniest level and stay there is to miss out.
If we are made of matter that is a collection of simpler elements, then it is not that great a leap to suppose that those elements are made of a simpler form. The complexity time has afforded the human being to become a working collection of basic elements is quite amazing. The blood, bone and tissue does come from just a relatively small amount of elements combined to make humans and everything else that is physically here in the whole universe.
The question is multiple choice:
Are the elements the simplest thing?
or
Are the elements yet another collection of something simpler?
If the later:
Is there no simpler thing, it just keeps getting simpler forever?
or
Is there a simplest thing?
It is my understanding that all matter can be reduced to a form of energy
so if the elements are the simplest thing, there would have to be as many different types of energy coming from these assorted fundamental elements. We only know of four forces and they are potentially the same force.
So this is why i wonder if there is the one fundamental energy/force combining like the elements combine, to make everything.
What is hidden? Your math has solved nothing but the desire to masturbate itself.
Math = generalization. 12 inches isn’t 12 inches. It’s just an estimate, as is with any type of measurement.
And now big bang bigots are the new hotness I guess… “Let’s infiltrate science, develop a theory based on Jewish quack science like that of Einstein, the famous plagiarist, liar and IDIOT, convince people that there are tiny little particles that we will eventually control inducing hysteria on the masses as they try to avoid the resulting mind control”.
Big bang theory is the new age Judaism for the masses. The allergic reaction to Christianity that is modern science and most of the atheistic minds that lives in a state of self-denial to escape any possible religious influence will be used against the masses for profit. Start with their paranoid bare bones scientific method then infiltrate and implant tiny little lies inside of it to break it down into quackery in order slingshot the masses to the other extreme polar opposite dividing them once again from their logical mind and making their helplessly search for their spirituality in a new religion which we will then use against them to slingshot them back to a new science then back to religion then back to science until eventually we realize that the vibrating band of the slingshot is coming to rest and we fall from power.
The next step in the oncoming totalitarian state of America is the further demoralization and degradization of the human consciousness through a tyrannical police state and control of emotions with drugs.
Well, that’s just a few of the great things that the Big Bang theory has brought us. A fragile science and paranoia.
Tiniest level? Prove that there is such as a ‘level’. Level is generalizing.
Bigots are usually hypocritical, but this is beyond hypocrisy. This is pathetic.
Oh, now I’m a Native American Anti-semite. You better ban me from this server which is located on my people’s soil that the white man stolez’!
You’re almost there, just try the middle ground here. You’re looking for something that doesn’t really exist in the first place. Particles don’t exist they’re just theories. Simpler forever depends on how far you want to cut. Once you realize that your quarks and your neutrons and electrons you’re trying to cut (if you’re trying, obviously that will be attempted in the future) are just existence cutting itself, you will see why everything is gravity. What are you dividing? Nothing. You can’t divide existence from itself. So even your theory that “quarks” can’t be divided is by default wrong because 1) you are saying that ‘they just exist’ which means 2) they are going to ‘squirm’ in reaction to any tool or molecule or other particles you try to cut them with and 3) A fundamental particle isn’t fundamental to other particles so it doesn’t exist everywhere, therefore it doesn’t exist as a fundamental particle.