When we imagine what our ancestors were ALREADY doing that mutated a genetic adaptation suitable to a survival function, how did they survive before that genetic adaptation, which ancestors do they imagine & what do they imagine they were ALREADY doing, and how did function get off the ground before life was surviving?
Is there a function of the ground that survives any and all environments at any time, and is it encoded in the DNA of every organism?
If it’s a code, is there a coder? Does the function describe the coder? Is the coder also the ground?
Because it doesn’t seem to me that experiencing is always/necessarily a break from reality/ground… nor does it seem it is always/necessarily adaptive/advantageous… to… reality as we know it (or perhaps don’t).
So.
What kind of survival really survives & what kind is really maladaptive? Do our genes take us all the way there, or leave the question open so we can choose/reject the sort of survival that survives?
What kind of survival really survives & what kind is really maladaptive? Do our genes take us all the way there, or leave the question open so we can choose/reject the sort of survival that survives?
meno answers(:
gasping and pasting, and multiple posting, so as the redundancy would simulate the convergence of all differentily cut recollections) - a kind of inverse of afformative action
The road less traveled at times is chosen wrongly, lack of compass, or unnoticed cosmic-Astro logic sign , so backtarack again , as though lost in maze, until a certain limit sends out it’s sign, finding the sos afloat in farthest see, but only if love can be superceedef by the cosmic reboot for peace.
For peace, or a piece needs the other to conform to that priority essential for it to resolve it, as to confirm It’s intention.
The crux of matching optimism and pessimism, the will”s differentiated objective; so calculated as does the probability of indiscernible cross crossed structural hegemony favors an eventual return toward a simulated benign intent , rather than it’s threatening shadiw
What drove Nietzsche mad was wanting to make what passes away eternal rather than revaluating so that his treasures were the eternal sort cultivated in what passes away, affirmed by the store of nature.
Another route to madness is trying with someone out of alignment, and so always being out of alignment with self and others, being in each other’s way, & (more essentially) the Way’s way…as if.
What a (strange) coincidence! Or is it just a coincidence? original purpose/life, like piety/good, is: random chance (evolution into order by /ordered/ accident), willful intention (of nature), or necessity of (nature’s) nature
Granted love is not love without demonstration, which must be a choice, what part of God‘s nature, in whose image we are made, is a necessity, and what part of God’s nature is just a fullness of (wiggly) capacity? (and, mutatis mutandis, our own nature/capacity… an automaticity/instinct… versus a fullness/privation)
