P1 - I am experiencing ‘existing’.
P2- Therefore there is a state of ‘existing’ or existence that is real or true.
P3- The only alternative state ‘non-existence’ cannot ‘exist’.
P4 - Therefore there is no place/state other than existence
for it’s origin or demise.
Conclusion - Since there is no place/state other than existence for it’s
origin or demise existence is ‘always present’ or eternal.
Are you saying, that because, when we die, we are unaware that we are dead, we live forever?
If in fact it is an alternative state, mustn’t it have some manner of presence? (I do so love to circle through this one! 
)
Nope…just an argument saying
[size=150] 'existence is eternal[/size]
…always present.
True[size=150] IF[/size] we were talking about alternative states [size=150]within existence.[/size]
But the whole point of the argument is to see that existence is real and all there ‘is’.
Every thing and non-thing which exists from thoughts to dark energy is within existence.
So existence portends reality is solely a spatial quality? As in “its” being the paramount container?
No ‘non=things’ is inclusive of ‘whatever’ is existing outside of spacoal qualities.
Even if there’s a void or dimension we cant even imagine if it ‘exists’ it is within existence.
if you are experiencing existing then it means that you are non existing and something else, than you cant say that existance is always present since you are not what you are experiencing and what you are is the only present that you dont aknowledge to realize because obviously you mean that this present you is not always, while it is the only present you know, which should had lead you to the opposite conclusion if you were an honest mind, by saying that present is not always and for present not being always it means that existance is not true, an non existance then is because if existance was then as you said non existance cannot be, it is all of creations so creations are based on lies and we dont know anything about what is behind lies powers they have to make fake existance and fake life to conscious free misery as awareness also ones
we as conscious or awareness that are always present when we are awake it is obvious that it depends on energy supports , we need to eat and see reality alive we need to sleep and rest and we need to die too
That’s like saying a unicorn must exist because there is no place for it not to exist. The point is that it doesn’t need a place because their is no place. Assuming that unicorns don’t exist.
nonexistance can be living, as existance can be non living
existance is a certainty fact, when there is no certainty true fact then it is non existing relatively and what is is simply of living fact that is not existing
because living in its true definition is absolute existance move, than it looks like non existance since it moves constance freedom as itself
but living can be relatively not absolute existing move, so it is then of relative existing move which is nothing really, since it cant be considered existing while it is a move and not to be considered living existing when it is not an absolute existing move
you must more aknowledge how truth is complicate because of its major factor being absolute and that is how it cant be always more than one move reality true and not more than one reality fact existing true
No it isn’t.
By definition and concept ‘non-existence’ can’t exist.
As far as unicorns go, human imagination does exist exist and even though true symbols are based on something or non-thing (dark energy)within existence our imagination can create images or concepts or words based on a distortion of an existing thing or non-thing.
That’s the problem and amazing thing about our minds I can think of ‘not’ things or ‘not’ non-things and imagine they exist.
We’re getting way far away from my original point…
Conclusion - Since there is no place/state other than existence for it’s
origin or demise existence is ‘always present’ or eternal.
‘Non-existence’ is existence.
It’s a combination of ‘negation’, which is a product of existence, and ‘existence’, which is simply a conceptualising of changing existence at least being perceptible at all, in whatever form.
All you’re doing is going, "when something is different to what I think, I feel a certain way. Then when I think of existence, I say to myself 'oh yeah, just “not that” ’ ".
Or thought etymologically, “nothing” exists by its standing-out inversive to how “things” stand-out. The dreaded “nothingness” pervades existence. It is as real as is the “concepts” we use to identify “it” (it not, of course, being an “it”). Get it?
i defined it, and no we are at the center of your point
look it is simple what i say, life is superior to existance truth ok? so livings conscious up can invent existance of their lives wills
so what do we know then, we know that this fake existance is non existance and that it is creating of livings wills inventions, so we dont have any argument of existance fact here, we have only facts of life free conscious powers and nonexistance realities facts looking as existing but actually are of livings that are not considered of truth
Translation of opening post:
P1: Existence is present
P2: Existence is present
P3: Existence is always
P4: Existence is always present
Conclusion: since there is no present/always that is not existence, existence is always present.
Yep, I was backing up your conclusion, yet simultaneously contradicting P3.
So how to you conceive of non-existence, other than how I described?