why one sentence only, why not one word or a letter what about an f, you joined today right? you suddenly had a vision about existence to share as present always, why dont you share your visions maybe we can help you with the logics roots justifications of it then
I wasn’t being rude I just couldn’t get the overall point you were making.
I used to write ad copy and I know the power of simplication in getting
a point across. That’s all.
Is the mind part of you or separate from you?
Is it possible for you – let alone the mind, or the entity, or the I, or the self, or the soul, or whatever you want to call it – to experience your own existence as existing without the help of that knowledge? Everything hinges on your own existence. Without that there is nothing upon which to base the existence of anything else. When you were a small one year old chilld, you weren’t aware of your own separate existence. When you get old and fall to alzheimers, your a goner. What happened in between. How did things slowly come and then slowly fade out of existence to you?
If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present.
- Wittgenstein
yes which proove how our condition is not dependant on us but other life forces, that we might be present to ourselves always but we are killed and destroyed and that is why we can also be aware of our death
there are a lot of spirits that are aware of being dead, and children brought to life at young age are very afraid to get back to death reality where they are aware been coming from
there is a definite huge issue of gods crimes assuming all souls and awareness being inferiors that they can abuse for anyway to use them as wills matters
that is your issue, meaning to bring across a point, there is no means when each letter is a point of conscious expression living, it is true reality of living words that proove how living is superior to existing then abstractly of truth justifications, while individually much more clearly detached of existance source that assure links between everything being the only way that assert existing of anything
and that is how as i already told you, living is always present not existance
if creations are always because gods cannot stop living, while they can stop existing since they are able to be liars in times creations lives
you cannot always escape in hypocrit ways by allegating justifications of helplessness, helplesness as it is cannot create anything so you cannot consider it as a source of means life that is for sure , but more fundamentally what is helpless cannot be even related to any concept of truth , so you are not saying anything or clarifying any point when you are limiting reality justification to this
yes existance is all what exist and that is how anything existing dont exist
but that thing you are refusing to give a name, principle or force or quality or those,wat is it hein? that is the only thing always there by itself present,
absolute reality is truth existance, now conscious above absolute reality as a position like first consciousness moves realisations of their free position quality, was to define itself as more then existing quality then since positionned above true existance
now conscious of void the first conscious one freedom existant, realized the fact that absolute reality was alive, from his perspective position above it free able to witnessing its wholeness objectively, absolute reality is alive meaning that it moves as a whole absolute itself alone and generate positive values of existance absolutely that explain its consciousness at a certain time and not of ever before, so first conscious understood its freedom reality being really absolutely since absolute reality move itself alone, and its real quality is not about existing but about being alive, and that is all what truth is then, when truth is the most positive source ends always one
and that realisation is the essence of conscious life wills in creations justifications but also the source of all conscious free living wills energies of that true conscious existing free realisations about objective truth life
and that what explain the rise of free conscious existing positive abstractions in void like us, as our position is under absolute reality that we cannot perceive objectively at all in void but we understood the principle of our freedom justification of living will base from truth life abstraction means of conscious existant freedom realisations
so conscious freedom above absolute reality were defined as existant creators, and conscious freedom under absolute reality were defined as living realities
the creators using absolute reality that they can perceive clearly from above, to justify their freedom justifications for their life wills, so that is how matters were brought into negative existance as resolutions of conscious free life wills and absolute principle possible applications
now the matters down moving because of both truth but very much innerly from the relation to projection with absolute truth reality move as alive , but superficially moving because of gods life resolutions as livings wills from what they all have interests from that negative existance grounds so they reach to agree on some scripts to live through all to get all what each one want from the whole fake existance grounds\
but those awareness in negative existance are also of true living rights of conscious freedom living wills as true abstractions energy moves
the position at conception cant define the living, that is a fundamental point that explain the relation between existance and life, the unity between existance and life is only because of truth reference realisation understanding the abstract certainty reality being the source end of absolute positive truth freedom
what exist is almost the opposite of what is living of, what exist is related to all truth existance to justify itself existance so it is always a relative certainty existing that is why cannot move, but the abstraction knowledge of this relation to truth allow the freedom rise move of living from meaning the compensation lack of existing relative certainty with absolute existance reality truth
now that living move allow at a certain level conscious of freedom also to move above itself move reality, and understand how the move is meaning absolute reality but realizing then means of absolute reality of its free conscious perspective being truth life as superior certainty of all that it is a true absolutely relative to that reality living of truth life
and here where living conscious should start to turn positively to existance joining all to truth life and happy of existing relative certainty inerty means of absolute reality being so real close to
but unfortunately because gods are very low and applied the principles of their lives wills in evil opposition to truth, that what i just said was translated in humans by loving matters existing as even the inerty of the most clear degradate condition as existing condition they move as livings from
to say the whole points briefly on that issue that i have in mind , i would add that gods acted in abusing their positions above absolute reality as evil ones, because in truth what is at concpetion above would move to compensate that existing fact by acting under, they forced the opposition to that geniun move to assert their abstract wills of abuse the situations the whole as creators interests in creations they all are part contributors of
i never get to personnal attack i am always objective, but you dont accept true words use, words are logics use of livings and not existing, existing use logics is numbers relations, livings use logics realities definitions is living words that have already the numbers logics inn plus the living conscious detachement freedom as true living reality realisator
it is obvious that all your reference in minds source are religious beliefs, when you are not giving any atheist argument or objective justification of reality existing positively
you cannot define mister anything from what it negates it being existing, even in mind alone it is impossible you always are leaning on positive source certainty to say out anything, and that is how hypocrit word is real
Existence is what ‘is’ … it doesn’t need extensive explanation…very simple…and ALL inclusive.
Any thing or non-thing outside of existence…does NOT exist…simple, clear, beautiful.
Maybe we have a translation problem in our discussion.
Please don’t take offense but your posts read like you are translating them into English.
is English your primary language?
you didnt say anything how that is any beautiful translation, what does it mean existance is what is>? you see a carpet or a stone or anything it is what exactly, you cant give quality of existing to what you cannot define, existing principally mean certainty the most, especially when obviously existance moves are the quality of existance reality, so it says how all what you say existing are never defined by themselves since it is what you may do of it that make them look existing
and for sure that getting to put all down of absolute truth is not an easy affair to justify exclusively in words translations with all the best means for, but conscious as livings and also events of truth sense only would confirm that expression being absolutely true, and apparantly you have no relation with being conscious honest living, when all your means are to blame misery of all miseries, to blame what dont exist of negative forces powers, it is amazing the insolence to conscious a lot of humans are, before asking me details about my english language after giving such succinct posts, why dont you ask yourself to give any positive justification about anything you say and stop using others expressions to mean negative justifications as the only justifications you do
Bro I’m only saying 'existence is ‘always present’ in this argument…you’re taking it all over the place.
no that is the point you didnt give any argument to an assertion that you want and contradict obviously all what any honest conscious perceive as existing, you will die for sure from where are you saying that existing is always present then
So you’re predicting my death from errant philosophy?
never, i mean your real death like any human being exactly as i would die too
Bro you have to be filtering our conversation through a translation program because the tenses are sometimes wrong and some of the things you’re attempting to express are jumbled.
Are you translating our conversations?