You exist Daniel because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist.We know all we need to know about existence.
What is ridiculous and where your paper will fall down so it’s pointless reading it is that you claim that you exist and are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion).
Who would want to read such nonsense? Be honest with yourself.
Things have move on from the claims of fools Daniel.
Focus on what life is Daniel not existence and non existence which is BINARY.
Great answer.
A binary processing biological machine which exists because it needs to exist to claim that it doesn’t exist and which claims that it’s a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) knows nothing about love or life because even though it exists it doesn’t have life so knows nothing about love.
As noted it isn’t a paper: https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/existence-is-infinite-revised/83675/5
And it isn’t printed out yet, I couldn’t throw it into the bin.
It appears you are approaching this subject from an alternative perspective which is unclear and rather off-topic.
However each thing you mention, each detail you discuss involves existence. Binary systems, both reality and illusion are aspects of being, aspects of existence, by definition.
Existence and Non Existence are binary and don’t possess life.Illusions don’t possess life either Daniel.
Don’t confuse them with life.
You need to exist to have life for sure but you can exist and not have life.
A binary processing biological machine computes that it exists and doesn’t exist.It exists because it needs to exist to compute that it doesn’t exist and it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t possess life
You need to exist to claim that you don’t exist so if you claim that you don’t exist then you are a liar.
As you exist it’s foolish to claim that you are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) when you really want to know what reality is.
Is that a summary of your view?
Each item you mention, each aspect and every detail, qualifies as existence, as being. Even nonexistence and non-existing qualify as conceptual mechanisms which you mention.
Every item you articulate is perceived or interacted with, at least in part, in some way. Even the conceptual mechanisms of nonexistence and non-existing. That qualifies as existence by definition.
Reading the entire essay is recommended.
What you propose does not conflict with the ontology. The ontology integrates your particular view as a particular system.
Existence and Non Existence is binary Daniel and there is no life in binary (Being is not life).
A binary processing AI machine exists and doesn’t exist.
A biological machine body exists and doesn’t exist,
There is no life in either because there is no life in the mere physical.
Both the AI machine and the biological machine body exist because both need to exist to claim that they don’t exist.So if either claim that they don’t exist then both are liars.
Even though both exist and are liars if they claim otherwise,neither possess life.
I need to exist to claim that I don’t exist is a paradox for both the AI machine and the biological machine body because it takes both beyond the limits of their binary software programming.
I’ll need more information concerning your particular view to properly approach these topics. Do you have specific definitions for your terms? What do you mean by existence? By being? Are the terms synonymous? Without a solid basis of sensible definitions for terms such assertions collapse.
The ontology presented provides clear definitions and terms.
Simply declaring that “being is not life” indicates that both being, as a term or concept, and life, although your term here is undefined, are aspects or parts of existence or being. By definition. Your declaration is acknowledgement, and thus perception on some level, of these things. That indicates existence.
What would life be if not being, if not existence? Are you claiming life is non-being?
If some thing is, for instance a biological machine, it is. That is part of existence.
The claim or aspect of “non-existing” and the phrasing “doesn’t exist” are conceptual mechanisms, constructs employed in cognitive processing. They are perceived, at least in part, in some way.
The ontology accommodates this view by inclusion of immateriality and immaterial things.
Does this not apply to your own premise:
Many of your posts in this thread have been reported as off topic. I’ve reviewed them and found that they are in fact off topic. I recommend you find a way to get on topic fast or stop posting in this thread.
An AI physical machine or a biological processing machine body are both operated with binary software.There is no life in these physical machines or the binary software which operates them Daniel.They both claim things.They can claim truths or lies.
Both can claim that they don’t exist which is a lie because both need to exist to claim it.So your claim that there is no such thing as non existence to an existing entity which claims things is true.Both existing entities which claim things may or may not have life.
Anything that claims things exists Daniel.Anything that doesn’t exist doesn’t have life.
The individual is neither vibrating matter nor the varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves emitted from it because the individual interprets varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves emitted from vibrating matter.
Vibration is the communication means between the physical and the metaphysical.
8 posts were split to a new topic: [SPLIT] from Existence is Infinite
Existence is not life even though you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist.