Existence Is Infinite

[promethean75]

Your mom is infinite

[Demon]

@Sculptor

@Demon

What is written is reality,

IN the beginning was the word???

You made me laugh. ‘And the word was Nonsense’? But seriously, do you really think that two different forms of the same existence (Consciousness and Being) should compete in an imaginary contest of primacy?

[daniel_j_lavender]

@Sculptor

Are you for real?
Just because a word exists does not mean it makes sense or is real.

Yes, just like the word.

[daniel_j_lavender]

@Demon

Ideas are an expressed call to action. You don’t understand what ideas are and are trying to shift that onto me?

Not necessarily. An idea is simply a thought or a concept:

Idea (noun)

1. a formulated thought or opinion
2. whatever is known or supposed about something
   (Idea. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/idea)

Idea (noun)

1. Something, such as a thought or conception, that is the product of mental activity
   (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company https://www.thefreedictionary.com/idea)

The terms and definitions you use bear little relation to standard terms and definitions.

@Demon

are you about to try to prove that beyond existence there is still something else that exists?

Existence is all.

Existence is eternal, without beginning or end, beyond life and death. Existence simply is.

[daniel_j_lavender]

From the essay:

@daniel_j_lavender

Existence just is. We, as conscious individuals, create purpose. Much like we create good and bad, right and left, up and down.

@daniel_j_lavender

All variance balances as simply being. All difference, all variation, all opposition balances as simply being, as simply existence.

The idea is illustrated in this image:

Simplified:

The images should clarify the philosophy presented.

The same theme is found in Leonardo’s Last Supper:

The Da Vinci Code: Last Supper Symbolism

The Da Vinci Code: Last Supper Symbolism Daniel J. Lavender [image] ”…all differences, all variations, all opposition, all contradiction ultimately balances as simply being… as simply existence.” We all know Dan Brown’s bestselling novel and the subsequent blockbuster film. Part of the investigation focused on Leonardo da Vinci’s Last Supper painting. However the ideas conveyed within the book and film are a bit misleading. The symbolism depicted is a bit inaccurate. It’s time the true sy…

[Demon]

@daniel_j_lavender

Not necessarily. An idea is simply a thought or a concept:

Idea (noun)

1. a formulated thought or opinion
2. whatever is known or supposed about something
   (Idea. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, IDEA Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster)

Idea (noun)

1. Something, such as a thought or conception, that is the product of mental activity
   (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company Idea - definition of idea by The Free Dictionary)

The terms and definitions you use bear little relation to standard terms and definitions.

Decided to argue by pointing to deceitful, nonsensical dictionaries? Fine. On the first quote and the first objection — how to formulate, if not to express? To separate, to highlight? And what’s the point? The form of the word must be applied, necessarily expressed, spoken, written. An idea is a vector. The direction itself has no power. An idea without power is just a thought.

The second definition is quite pathetic. You’ve learned something, assumed something, but what next? Will there be movement necessarily? No, of course, so where is the sign, the consequence, of any idea?"

Let me know if you’d like any adjustments!

[Demon]

@daniel_j_lavender

Existence is all.

Existence is eternal, without beginning or end, beyond life and death. Existence simply is.

Existence is a form. But it has no beginning, only an end. It’s hard for you to grasp that the end is the Apocalypse, when further existence becomes impossible because the goal has been achieved? And the reason there is no Beginning is different. ‘Beginning’ is a temporal category. But if there was no time itself, then how could its categories arise? And here’s something even funnier. Life and death don’t just exist; they define, as signs, the very existence. It is alive, changing, rational—not just rationally organized and dying, losing the meaning of life.

[Demon]

Isn’t it funny to ask, have you ever wondered what negation is? And how about the concept of ‘negative numbers’? What is being negated, and who benefits from it? Facts are denied with the intention of lying. But why? Denying a lie is amusing, in that case, the lie multiplies as justification. But why deny facts and live in a lie? Who needs it, and who benefits from it?

[Sculptor]

@Demon

You made me laugh. ‘And the word was Nonsense’? But seriously, do you really think that two different forms of the same existence (Consciousness and Being) should compete in an imaginary contest of primacy?

You have some crazy ideas.
How th F did you get to that from what I said?
LOL
You present 2 linked concepts and imply they could be “in competition”
These are just differences in POV.
ANd I was commenting on the abstruse and rather absurd idea that if there is word it is true, which you more than implied.
Are you even bothereing to follow what is being said?

[Sculptor]

@Demon

Isn’t it funny to ask, have you ever wondered what negation is? And how about the concept of ‘negative numbers’? What is being negated, and who benefits from it? Facts are denied with the intention of lying. But why? Denying a lie is amusing, in that case, the lie multiplies as justification. But why deny facts and live in a lie? Who needs it, and who benefits from it?

WHy not ask Theorore Adorno - you’ll get lots more obscurantist word salad to keep you happy for days as to insist upon a separation, whether as a description of the world or only for the purposes of analysis, between a ‘sphere of social action in general’,'? and a pre or a social natural world,
reinforces culturalism. For a materialist theory, to dominatc other
humans - since humans are not pure culture - is dready domination of naturr as well as social domination, not social domination instead of or ‘modelled upon’ domination of nature. Only a theory which itself presupposes mastery of nature can regard intersubjectivity as a separate sphere which has somehow separated itself from the natural.

[MagsJ (Surya Loka)]

@daniel_j_lavender

@MagsJ

…that doesn’t cease it to be so, in being a conundrum… for me.

It’s easy to become entangled in complexity as conscious beings.

..the matter is a musing and not an entanglement in complexity, for me.. my mind, wondering and pondering, as it pleases..

.

@daniel_j_lavender

@MagsJ

…and yet… these multiple universes would all exist, so all be part of existence, no?

Yes. Existence isn’t necessarily confined to the universe.

There are also creator-creation systems and theological frameworks to consider.

Universe is an inclusive term however existence is more comprehensive. More practical as well.

With the terms and definitions provided one could point to a palm tree, or any other item, and easily claim existence. However one could not point to a palm tree and easily claim universe. Universe is a relatively restrictive term.

I see existence as a totality of all that has been called into being, so.. seamless, simple, serene.

[Demon]

@Sculptor

WHy not ask Theorore Adorno -

To ask a Theorore Adorno about lies? Well, in fact, people generally lack true understanding of what a lie is. For example, Truth cannot be distorted — it can only be slandered. A lie is not opposed to Truth itself, but to truthfulness.

[Sculptor]

@Demon

To ask a Theorore Adorno about lies?

You were talking about “negation” .

LOL Do you think negation is lies??

[Demon]

Existence is complete in the present moment, and incomplete in relation to the next.**
This is the mark of a lie.
Existence, as a whole, is deceitful.
So why talk about its fragments at all?