Existential individualism
This is a theory describing our ‘spirituality’ but without any requirement for externalisation. It is not ‘spiritual’ in the sense that there is a non existent world or realm to wit we originate. It is essentially a non-spiritual ‘spirituality’. No ‘socialist’ [global/universal] philosophy ~ a God/gods, a force, nirvana/Buddha being, can truly describe reality entire. They all rely of on defining a greater singular reality and a lesser, false or illusory non reality.
Here I am stating that I am the singularity, ergo you are also. If one thinks in global terms about our origins, we will naturally arrive at the vastness of a spiritual space, set against the minuteness of our individual existence. I made myself manifest in earthly form and partook in the creation of the world through my force and not as a result of another [global] force. When I [you] see a deity of singularity I am setting up a perception of a greater global reality and diminishing my own to a comparative nothingness, yet an infinitesimal point is as great as an infinity. What is worse, is that the manifest global reality ~ the collective of all our global perceptions, does nothing but attempt to diminish my own reality.
Life is a duality originated in Endosymbiosis; the Symbiosis in which one of the symbiotic organisms lives inside the other. Our thoughts are a dialogue [because of this] formed between contrasting ideas in an internal duality, and even the formation of a monologue requires a duality to manifest itself - due to the required conceptual differentiation.
Duality cannot have beginnings!
You cannot have an absolute ‘singularity’, a void or space, and then a duality, e.g. nirvana then life/form. Because the said singularity would necessarily have to contain a duality such to manifest something different from itself. That there is duality and existence as it’s manifestation in terms of universe, forces the issue where there cannot equally be a reality without duality [i.e. And a universe].
Duality therefore must be an eternal, and all dualisms must belong ultimately to that. As we are a duality we are also an eternal at base, then as that cannot end/begin it necessitates an existence, …an eternal existence. Like a nut to a tree, our existential form [‘soul’] cannot cease and will always manifest itself, with an emphasis upon the duality of our being as a self manifesting entity. This is not reliant upon a God creator or some such thing, except as a manifestor of worlds [universe], as any individual being can manifest worlds as it does with its self [a ‘world’]. I am not intending to insult nor show no gratitude to such a manifestor of worlds, nor should I accept a degradation of my own uniqueness and equivalent potential.
Derived morality; I am guilty of the thoughts and things manifest by my own continuum, I am not guilty of the thoughts and things manifest by another’s continuum i.e. of the world, and of what the world has manifest within me. Simply put, if you don’t want to think or do a thing, then where such a thing is not of ones own volition, we are not guilty. The thing to be determined is weather or not such things are of one’s own continuum, and then we are not guilty of a crime, but only of being what we individually are. The question then becomes; are we as individuals born innocent, are our continuum’s devoid of all ill, and if so then where does the entropy and evil in the world come from?
I state that all eternals even being duel at base, do not of themselves derive ‘evil’. Such things are finite and not eternal, and belong to the menagerie of conspiring changes respective to the confusion of difference the world acquires in due course of the changes occurring within it. A deity of creation [e.g. God] ~ given that the universe is singularly created and not as an effort of multiples, or all of ‘us’, is not guilty of the worlds ills for the very same reason. That there is transience and that in minority this manifests an opaque and confused duality [evil], is simply part of how difference manifests. It is for us and possibly in collusion with our chosen deities, that we endeavour [end/devour] to command entropy when it seeks to divide and destroy us.
There is an evolution of individuals which move up through form eventually manifesting as human. This doesn’t mean humanity is something aside from nature, but must surely be the pinnacle of that and necessarily includes it. Like a mountain the individual manifests itself through form [hence derives caring for animals], eventually arriving at the optimum shape and entity - humanity. If however we consider this to be a global, we are denying the very thing we are; an individual. If humans are all the same they are no longer human in the sense of being built from everything which comprises ‘the mountain’. It is for us all to ‘find ourselves’ to discover our true individuality and identity, where society must prescribe a means to achieving that, as opposed to creating a singular set of rules we must go by such to be ‘human’ as if that is something distinct from creation. Otherwise society is the thing we are, and we are not individually what we are. We would then have made >something else< which has global values as if an entity unto itself, and something which doesn’t otherwise exist.
I & I survive.
_