maxkeiser.com/2012/12/17/mass-sh … r-scandal/
Don’t know if I believe it, but here’s an early Christmas gift to those into conspiracy theories:
Both the recent shooting and the Colorado Batman shooting apparently both have connections to a corporation which hasn’t paid taxes on quite a bit of income.
Egads, there is an addictive element to reading. that stuff.
Is it possible to get addicted to certain ways or informational writings?
Yes that sounds very plausible - perspectives as stimulants.
“Mass Shootings Connected To Libor Scandal – THIS IS A HOAX STORY”
It’s a hoax story, see? The article says so.
Yeah, the lone gunman thing is a cover up in every case. The world is just more dynamic and interesting that way.
Yeah cause it’s so much more indicative of intelligence to just accept that they’re all lone gunman. Every single one. God forbid one of them is not a lone gunman. God forbid we risk the public shame to actual use our fucking brains. How many people push the subject aside because of some PC thing?
Every time this happens, I do actual research into the person. You guys should try it.
Or just some critical thinking. Can you cry from the corner of your eye while looking down? No. Should you even have the capacity to cry when you donefuck hundreds of children overseas? No.
Yeah Obama asked me to do it and I turned it down because I was making pizza that afternoon.
It has nothing to do with intelligence. But it has a lot to do with the need to be in on the secret, or the need to be in the know. Problem is, you don’t actually know any more than the average schmuck, you’re simply working from different primary sources. Which media do you trust? MSM or fringe stuff? It’s all personal preference - aesthetic dispositions - how do i like my info served? Warm, cold, salty, sweet? Any way you choose, you’re being fed.
the only problem with this is that it implies the sources are equal and that his aren’t particularly off base, which they obviously are
I believe whatever Gobbo says because of his groundbreaking research. I’m sure he already cracked the case. But if he exposes the truth, the CIA will probably shit in his hair or something.
That isn’t exactly how it works. More like, if the internet becomes too much of a problem, they may try to ban it somehow. But that is difficult. I think the internet will live. The CIA can’t stop it.
What a sad, disgusting view of your ability to apprehend.
Or it’s all a load of shit
To apprehend what? Seriously, i want to know what i am failing to get . . .
That could explain quite a bit. Advertisment, news, politics, religion. There must be people more susceptible then others to the stimulation.
to apprehend criminals, of course
To apprehend. Understand or perceive.
or, to catch criminals! that sounds much more fun
i know what the word means. i’m looking for the accompanying noun. Understand or perceive what? Which latent truths? Cause i can understand and perceive most conspiracy theories without too much difficulty, i simply don’t believe them for the most part. You’re exasperated with people not believing what you tell them, i get it. But that doesn’t mean that everybody else is deluded. It actually reflects that the alternate information you are giving them is every bit as suspect, if not more, than the information they already have, so there’s really no compelling reason for them to believe you.
I’m not exasperated that people won’t believe what I tell them. Why would I want people to just blindly believe me?