First Letter of PoR to a Congregation of Unrepenting Sinners

Dear Unrepentful,

As I write, I am being filled with the Holy Spirit, as of this very moment. The parable I am about to preach to you came about as a result of the mysterious workings of the Holy Spirit and it is true to the Word on every account. May the Light of the Word shine on you all. In the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

It was a typical autumn morning in a typical Sydney suburb. The sky was clear and the crisp, golden ray of the autumn sun bask the fallen leaves in a golden glow. The air was clear and fresh, and cool. It was the typical pleasant morning.

Down the street a white woman of 52 walked clutching her handbag. She wore a thin coat and a graceful hat that covered most of her greys. She walked briskly. Walking toward her, she saw a man of African dissent, well built about 1.9 metres tall. He looked tall and handsome, of about 30. He smiled her as they passed and she smiled back. Then all of a sudden, he reached out and grabbed her handbag and pulled. The woman was in total shock, she was dragged along as she hanged on. She tried to yell, but she was too shocked. The man dragged her, but when he realised she would not let go. He wacked her savagely on the head, which knocked the old woman off balance and he snatched the hand bag from her. As she fell, she saw him running away. Then she hit the pavement, hard.

When she woke up, she found herself in a hospital bed, with a bruised elbow and a painful swelling in her head. But she was a strong woman and she recovered. She was recovered emotionally, mentally and physically. In short, she was completely well. She suffered no psychological damage. So naturally, the police took her to the station.

Constable A: ‘How are you feeling, Miss B, I have to ask you a few questions about your attacker’
Miss B: ‘ok’

Constable A: ‘could you describe to me your attacker’s appearance?’
Miss B: ‘human’

Constable A: ‘I mean was the attacker male or female’
Miss B: ‘I don’t know.’

Constable A: ‘you did see your attacker.’
Miss B: ‘yes’

Constable A: ‘so was your attacker wearing a mask?’
Miss B: ‘no’

Constable A: ‘so you must know whether your attacker was male or female’
Miss B: ‘I can’t’

Constable A: ‘why not?’
Miss B: ‘we are all human beings, there is neither male nor female, to speak of human beings as male or female would be discriminatory’

Constable A: ‘are you a male or female’
Miss B: ‘I don’t know, as I said, to say that I am male or female is discrimination based on gender’

Constable A: but you are female
Miss B: that is discrimination based on gender! As we all know, we are all human beings so gender does not exist.

Constable A: to what ethnic group does your attacker belong to?
Miss B: I don’t know, because it would be racism to label someone by their ethnicity.

Constable A: but if there is no race, how could racism even exist?
Miss B: it was invented to justify slavery

Constable A: Racism was invented to justify slavery but the race is not an invention.
Miss B: Yes it is. There is no such thing as race! Because we are all of the human race!

Constable A: are you blind?
Miss B: no

Constable A: can you tell me whether Jackie Chan is black white or Asian or President Bush is black white or Asian?
Miss B: (silent)

Constable A: do not avoid the questions, you must tell us to which ethnicity group your attacker belongs to so we can bring out our file.
Miss B: but to label someone based on their ethnicity is discrimination, we are all of the human race.

Constable A: but how can you be aware of discrimination if there is not something to be discriminated about in the first place?
Miss B: (silent)

Constable A: what about your attacker’s age?
Miss B: that’s ageism

Constable A: all you have told me is that your attacker is human.
Miss B: but to tell you ethnicity would inadventely prejudice against a community

Constable A: now, first of all, how can you be aware of the concept of ethnicity that the word implies if you have no experience of ethnicity? Remember, language describes experience, it does not create experience. Secondly, by saying your attacker is human you are incriminating the whole of humanity which is even a greater incrimination than ethnic incrimination. Do you think it is just for the whole of humanity to pay for the mistake of a single ethnic group?
Miss B: I just remembered, I was told at school that there is no ethnic group. I am to tolerate my attacker who is human.

Constable A: you have been brain washed! Now, look at this picture I am about to present you.
Constable brings up the picture of George Bush. He continues, the human being you are looking at belongs to the white race and the male gender of about 50.
Miss B: NO. stop it, that is discrimination! you can’t discriminate against human beings. that’s BAD!

Constable A: why is discrimination bad? I have many black constables here and I treat them with love and respect.
Miss B: because my teacher said so! STOP discrimination!

Constable A: they want to have healthy, strong black kids…
Miss B: no, you can’t discriminate!

Constable A: what? don’t black people have a right to have black kids?
Miss B: but that is based on race!

Constable A: then when and how ought people marry?
Miss B: they ought to marry based on looove!

Constable A: and I guess they ought to divorce based on hate?
Miss B: no, they are to marry for love, and love only!

Constable A: people may fall in love and marry and have kids. but that does not change the fact that they are interracial couples.
Miss B: but that’s discrimination!

Constable A: so if I say black and white are different colors, is that discrimination?
Miss B: yes, of course it is. there is only the color!

Constable A: but how do you know it is discrimination without being able to discriminate yourself? black and white are different colors.
Miss B: no, they are just colors.

Constable A: so, there is no gender, no race, no age, no color. but do you notice the words I speak have different pronunciations?
Miss B: no, because that is discrimination

Constable A: but ‘because’ and ‘that’ and ‘is’ and ‘discrimination’ are pronounced differently!
Miss B: no they are the same! I am anti-discrimination

Constable A: but if they are the same, how can you tell the different vowels apart?
Miss B: that is discrimination!

Constable A: what the??? did you know that ANTI-discrimination is to discriminate against discrimination?
Miss B: No!! that is discrimination!

Constable A: you are only been brain washed to follow one face of the coin! you are being a facist here.
Miss B: I am against discrimination.

Constable A: It is not discrimination to acknowledge people’s differences. It is a matter of respect. To deny the expression of differences, you are being a fascist and you are not allowing others to exist as independently unique beings. We are all unique and similar. We are unique in that we are all individuals. We are the same, in that we are all human beings, and that we belong to different clubs like gender, race, age, religion, just to name a few. Sometimes, within the human club, we move between the religion club, so I may be a devout Catholic, and my child WILL be a devout Catholic if HE wants to go to heaven. But your child may choose to become a Protestant. But that does not stop your child’s child from realsing his mistake and come back to Catholicism. The arms of the Church is always open.

However, if your child decides to change the race club, then that becomes permanent. Despite the fact that his grandfather, his father and his mother belonged to the same club. Once he leaves the race, he becomes eternally banished from it. Because he is leaving the existing race club to start a new one from scratch. The race club he starts will be distinct from the race club to which his parents belonged to so he no longer belongs to the same race club. Which is just as well. Because we expect our members to be loyal and love one another, if he wants to leave, that’s fine. But he must be told that he can never come back. Because his mixed descendents can mix together in whatever way they choose, but they can never mix back.

Why people don’t think the race club is important is beyond me. Considering that all their ancestors going back thousands of years belonged to it. and now because he is in love, which later leads to lust, he banishes himself. how irresponsible. shouldn’t he be carrying on the tradition of the fathers?

Miss B: but we are all human beings

Constable A: but we also belong to different races of human beings. Consider this, a black person and a white person, you would reason they are both human beings, and some how that’s where your reasoning stops. Isn’t it also true that they belong to races of human beings. and isn’t marriage between a man and a woman?
Miss B: but that’s sexism!

Constable A: ok, assuming there are genders called ‘man’ and ‘woman’ they marry and have kids.
Miss B: yes, assuming, but only assuming. because we don’t want to discriminate.

Constable A: ok, now assuming ‘man’ and ‘man’ marry they can’t have kids.
Miss B: of course, a man can’t have kids with a man. but only assuming ‘man’ exist! only assuming.

Constable A: good. now, assuming ‘a black woman’ and a ‘white man’ gets married, what assuming race exist will their child be?
Miss B: neither! different races of people mix together and their kid is a mixture of both, but only assuming races exist. because my biologist tells me they can not find race. They can only find the human race!

Constable A: yes, just like the mathematician who can’t find order label the result of his failed experience ‘randomness’, to show he has succeeded once again spectacularly in failure. In all the experiments the biologist found the race but they say it is too insignificant. just like saying all decimal points past the tenth is irrelevant. I mean just because differences are small, does not mean they do not exist. Plus, you do not even need a biologist to tell you that. Why don’t you look around you, and you see that Michael Jackson is a white man, he can have white kids. He loves being black so he makes himself look white, that’s of course, assuming color exist.
Miss B: yes, only assuming again.

Constable A: Jacki Chan is an Asian, only assuming.
Miss B: Yes, he is asian, assuming gender and Asians and their culture exist.

Constable A: Did you know that when white people (only assuming again) came to Australia, they declared Australia Terra Nullius, meaning ‘uninhabited’, which basically means no one lived in Australia, that the Aboriginal people who lived in Australia for thousands and thousands of years did not exist. And because Aboriginal people did not exist, the white people can claim the land as their and do whatever they wished with the land. It was only till the Mabbo decision, which overturned the Terra Nullius concept and declared that Aboriginal people as their own race, with their own culture, had existed. So in law at least, the Aboriginal people did not exist! but in reality, there are many many paintings made of the Aboriginal people, and records of their culture. However, it is the white lie that said they did not exist was not overturned some 200 years later. Since the Aboriginals did not exist, the white people can do whatever they want with those invisible people whom they can see but did not exist. This total disregard for existence lead to genocide, which according to the white lie could not have happen because race did not exist. This lead to the Stolen Generation whereby Aborignal people who did not exist were kept in white homes in white culture. The deliberate denial of their existence is the excuse for the rape of the people, but it can not be a crime because they did not exist.

Human beings have shape and with shape must have color. When one group of people attack another group of people, one can not help but imagine their color. On television, they are often shaded grey, like a shadow. But in reality, the peoples have colours. When you see hundreds of people with ‘middle eastern’ appearance fight with hundreds of whites, and you say race does not exist. You are kidding yourself. you are not going to solve the race problem without even acknowledging its existence. Burying your head in the sand won’t help.

Now, some idiot demands a criteria to define a race. He is really demanding a linguistic criteria. Basically, if you can not say it, it does not exist. The mixed people constitute a race in themselves. so there are no words to describe them. The word ‘white race’ strictly refers to people of European descend. To say that white race does not exist, is the person denying the white race its right to exist? The same goes for all other races.

If the same criteria is applied to human beings, we can not define what is a human being. Simply saying we ALL have five finger would not do because there are beings who resemble human beings in every way but have six fingers.

To deny that a race exist, is to deny the race its existence. Which according to the Geneva convention is genocide. The whole claim is stupid, arrogant, and based on word playing. in particular, the definition of universals and particulars. if one uses the impossible criteria, one can not even define a cat, while we know cats exist. We can not have an infinite set of criterias to define what is essentially a psychological universals. If we try to define a tree, there are many variations of the tree. some tall, some short, how would one define a tree? anthropology though in the 19th century is backward, it has the most common sense. even within Asians, the northern asians are lighter in skin color to the southern asians.

To test whether a person is white, black or asian is easy. Just look at the family tree and see whether the parents have mixed. Really, the ‘criteria for defining a race’ is itself a nonsense demand. It can not be understood. A car can not be defined simply as something with four wheels, because some wheels are bigger than others, and are of different brand. but they are all wheels. wheels are not all exactly round. so the demand fails itself because it is itself contradictory. there are criterias for defining a particular, but there are no criterias for defining a universal. Because to define means to point, and you can not point to a group of cats without pointing to a particular one of them.

Miss B: so we are all human beings with race clubs to belong to. I did not know I belonged to a special club simply for who I am.

Constable A: well you do, my dear!
Miss B: I feel so happy.

A Cat woman: Mewwwooo. We are all mammals, calling yourselves humans is being specism.
Miss B: we are of the human race.

A Cat woman: to claim you belong to the human race is discrimination!
Miss B: but I am a human being, and you are a cat

A Cat woman: that is discrimination, we are all mammals.
The cat woman showed her claws and slashes Miss B’s throat, because IT, I mean SHE is hungry and wants to eat Miss B.

Miss B: Help me Constable A, help your fellow human being!
Constable A: nonsense, we are all mammals, it is perfectly normal for one mammal to eat the other. To prefer a human being more than a cat is to commit the sin of specism just as being racially prejudicial commit the sins of racism. Our Lord the divine invisible never speaking god or gods would not tolerate it.

Miss B: Help me! oh, I feel the pain, I am suffering. Take pity on thy neighbor!
Constable A: Nonsense, who art thou neighbor? Remember the parable of the Good Samaritan? Just because we belong to the human species, does not mean I will help you. I have no loyalty, all I care about is wealth, money, someone to look after me, someone who is strong.

Miss B: who are you, traitor to your fellow human being, though not a traitor to your race?
Constable A: I can be anything I want! I am a man one day, and an animal the next. I am everybody and no body.

Miss B: so you won’t help me? don’t you feel my pain?
Constable A: I am not the one getting clawed, so how can I possibly feel your pain?

Miss B: I am your fellow human being! Help me, prefer me over this cat! Where is your human instinct!
Constable A: I have suppressed it, because it is unnatural, it leads to specism, just like racial instinct lead to racism. they are all bad!

Miss B: Oh Lord, have mercy on my soul, I pray that you in your infinite glory will forgive Constable A for not helping me. He does not know what he is doing.
Constable A: of course I know what I am doing. I am not helping you while you are being savagely eaten by Cat Woman here.

Miss B: Forgive me, my Lord, where art thou my Lord! Oh forgive me! I was wrong about the race. My attacker is a man of African dissent, well built about 1.9 metres tall. He looked tall and handsome, of about 30. Bring him to justice my Lord. I was brainwashed, now I understand. Oh, forgive me my Lord, I never wanted to deny another race its existence. Forgive me. Dear Lord, into thy hands I give my Spirit.

With a whimper, the Spirit of Miss B ascends graciously into Heaven, into the welcoming arms of Our Father, where she lives in eternal happiness with our Virgin Mother and with all the congregation of Saints and Martyrs, forever and ever. Ironically, her suffering on earth has brought her, her redemption.

Crab Man: what is this fuss all about? We are not mammals we are animals.

So the Crab Man killed and ate the cat woman.

BroomStick: We are not animals, we are atoms!

So the BroomStick killed the Crab Man and Constable A

Nuclear Explosion: We are not atoms, we are energy!

So the Nuclear Explosion through energy turned BroomStick which was matter, into energy.

Then suddenly, the Heavens opened. And PoR descends, riding on a white cloud, surrounded by all the Angels in Heaven. In a loud voice, he proclaimed 'Miss B belonged to the white race, but she also belonged to the Human Species, which is a part of the mammal kingdom, which belonged to the animal kingdom that constitute the animate kingdom, but the animate kingdom and the inanimate kingdom are called the atoms kingdom, which came from the energy kingdom. So Miss B is a white human being that belonged to the animate animal kingdom who is made from atoms that can be decomposed into energy.

This is the Word of the Holy Spirit which now speaks through me. PoR held up a book and said. ‘Glory be to God in His Highest! Maker of Heaven and Earth…’ Just as God loved the world so much that he gave his only begotten son to save it. PoR hated the world so much that with a violent shout, he killed all animals including the racial abominations and took away the Light which on the first day touched Israel, and which only later embraced the whole world.

‘The world is at its sinful end.’ He proclaimed. After he said the Last Eucharistic pray, the clouds which came down with him from Heaven, lifted him back up to where he traditionally came from, Our Father Almighty in all His Honor and Glory, forever and ever.

‘Per ipsum, et cum ipso, et in ipso, est tibi Deo Patri ominipotenti, in unitate Spiritus Sancti, ominis honor et gloria. Per omnia saecular saeculorum. Amen’

Did you get your writing style from reading Chick publications?
Nah, if PoR read them he would surely be conviced of anti-Catholic Protestantism – too convincing in their arguments.

PoR, i’m just curious. are you from one of those weird churches, like apostolic or pentacostal or something?

that stupid parable made no sense. then again, it was so long that i just got bored and skipped to the end muttering “wow mrs. b is an idiot”. by the way, by MY beliefs (i’ll give you the benefit of having your own opinion), you are NOT divine, that is NOT the word of the Holy Spirit, and your ego is about to explode your head like mt. saint helens unless you deflate it.

no offense.

ok that was a tad harsh. but please don’t post things and claim it’s the divine word of God.

and just to spare everyone else having to read an argument, (since we’ve all experienced how they ruin threads quite nicely,) i’m just not gonna return to this one.

There’s nothing wrong with discrimination. Discrimination is just teliing the difference.

Son of Adam or Daughter of Eve,

Have you ever seen or read To Kill a Mockingbird? The conditions of that court without the lawyer is the extreme we should avoid when encountering race. Of course there are people who look alike due to common origins, and these could be used as a description. The lady in your post could have mentioned gradation of skin colour and given a description of facial shape without mentioning race specifically. In this case, mentioning race seems to be a shorthand for a “look”. This does not prove you can go around killing people because of racial differences if you are a Christian, as argued here:
christiananswers.net/q-aig/r … ition.html

But how would you feel if someone described you as typical cockney or something? Or, that you looked russian? Would that be fair and respectful? That’s what I’m talking about right there.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is the sum of the law and the prophets.”

DO I HAVE TO EXPLAIN MY OWN PARABLE!

creation imperfect

I have no ego! I am only serving God by revealing the sin that springs from intermarriage. see Ezra also I am a Catholic.

pxc

You are right on! Only when we are comfortable discriminating others, can we truely accept other’s differences, whether racial, gender. If you bury your head in the sand and claim race does not exist for fear of racial split in humanity, then that’s just blocking your ears and say that since you ‘can’t’ hear arguments, that arguments do not exist. which is pretty stupid if you ask me.

what i find distressing is this, the media is promoting intermarriage. It is a sin to speak against it? I mean is it a racist to want my race to exist? Is it a racist to want to marry within my race?

my real name

I have already explained the Satanical nature of that site.

It said, race is trivial therefore it does not exist. Now it is truth that race exist. but they pervert it by saying it is trivial so it does not exist. does that mean atoms which are ‘trivial’ does not exist also?

but what does “mentioned gradation of skin colour and given a description of facial shape” imply but not race? so why is it wrong to label someone by race? it is racist? it is about facing the music that we are different no matter how deeply you bury your head in the sand.

is the word ‘race’ such a dirty word?

people can call me whatever they like, I don’t mind. I feel disrespected if people start calling me a descendant of apes. that I share a common ancestry with the monkeys.

I mean if you are a true Darwinist, then since we share a common ancestry with monkeys, then why can’t we mate with them. similar goes your argument in regards to race.

I have quoted Ezra, did Jesus quote from the Sacred Scriptures or Paul. Did Jesus every say Paul said this or Paul said that. but Paul always says, Jesus this or that. and Jesus always say the SCRIPTURE said this or that. Are you really a Catholic? I am wondering. If you are not a true believer it is ok. I have seen protestants taking the Eucharist, and I feel sick just thinking about it.

I do not wish to receive communion in your Mormon church, Pinnacle.
For obvious reasons.

I do not wish to receive communion in your Mormon church, Pinnacle

Well. I just hope that your invented protestanism won’t lead you to hell.

American Culture is laced with psychedelic faith-nuts!

Why is it that a vast majority of you Americans can’t handle the harsh nature of reality?

You jostle and compete between different religous-demoniations like children in little-league!?

I think you need to take a serious look at how fucked up a large part of your culture is an, like a wound, heal it! Not with the power of God but with the power of techno-rational partical behaviour - i.e. cooperation and civil communication!

It’s hard though… .not many can break free of the media. Bush is shoving religion down the throats of americans…

Pssht…it’s easy to avoid. Either you believe it or not. Bush isn’t changing anyone’s minds around here. Most people’s religion is either based on a personal choice or is so embedded into them as a young child that they keep it forever.

I don’t think there should be as much religion waved around as is, but this country has had strong Christian overtones for quite some time. Bush is just saying it more.

And PoR is unique. That’s the best word I can think of. I’ve never seen anyone like that before.

I have seen one of a Higher Bent than POR - he is called Raphael.

He is an evangelical savant.

He could teach a Hindu cow to speak Icelandic.