Formation

[encode_decode]

Arc…

Here’s a poem I wrote that explores the idea of what people talk about when they agree on everything. In the poem, I express the idea that even when we agree on certain things, our unique perspectives and experiences can still bring something new and beautiful to a conversation…

The words we speak are like the leaves
That rustle in the wind
Sometimes they dance in harmony
And sometimes they rescind

But even when we share a view
That seems to be the same
Our varied hearts and minds can bring
A new and brighter flame

For in the depths of all our souls
There lies a unique spark
That’s kindled by the world around
And glows into the dark

So let us not just nod and smile
But speak our minds with pride
For in the beauty of our words
A new connection may abide

And though we may agree on much
There’s always room to grow
By sharing thoughts and insights bright
Our knowledge overflows.

The poem encourages us to speak our minds and share our thoughts with others, even when we think we might agree with them.

By doing so, we can deepen our understanding of ourselves and each other, and create new connections that enrich our lives… thank you!

[encode_decode]

Meno_

Your words speak to the interconnectedness of all things, and the potential for there to be infinite complexity beyond our current understanding. It is true that we are limited by our sense organs and our ability to perceive certain wavelengths of light and other forms of energy. However, this does not mean that these wavelengths and energies do not exist. In fact, it is likely that there are many more forms of energy and matter that we have yet to discover and comprehend.

@Meno_

Very briefly Encode;

In that black hole perhaps rest different colored wavelength for which we have not adept sense organs to conceive that . Perhaps there is no state which has any empty spaces, all is full,

How were antithesis formed? Out of contrasting colors of black and white? The abysmal black against the white lit objects illuminated by the sun?

If so and it’s probably more likely then not, then our conscious dialectical thoughts were formed by these perceptions, and they may have differently positioned conceptions, if we were to have evolved adaptive tools which were sensitive to those missing signs of substance.

For a long time, here, been trying to double think, as if the couplets were antithetical, but maybe the time has come to reverse the ‘flow’ as you call it, by rethinking evolutionary progress.

Your thoughts on antithesis and the contrast of black and white are interesting, and it is possible that our dialectical thoughts were formed by these perceptions. However, it is also important to recognize that these perceptions are shaped by our culture, history, and individual experiences. As we continue to evolve and develop new tools and technologies, we may gain new perspectives and understandings that challenge our current ways of thinking.

Ultimately, the process of evolutionary progress is an ongoing one, and we must remain open to new ideas and experiences in order to continue to grow and evolve.

… and of course, not shut the door to the old …

[Arcturus_Descending]

encode_decode wrote,

Here’s a poem I wrote that explores the idea of what people talk about when they agree on everything. In the poem, I express the idea that even when we agree on certain things, our unique perspectives and experiences can still bring something new and beautiful to a conversation…

The words we speak are like the leaves
That rustle in the wind
Sometimes they dance in harmony
And sometimes they rescind

I have watched the leaves often. Either way, they are beautiful as they go about their journey…kind of like the clouds do. Sorry, do not mean to digress - or do I?
Perhaps the words spoken were not so harmonious in the first place. They were meant only to please the other, to get along. …not really “real”… Just a thought there.

I think that people have to come to the self-knowledge or truth first of realizing that there IS something within them that is worthy of speaking about, showing to the world, that is different than the thoughts of others and that they are entitled and free to see things differently and to express them.

But even when we share a view
That seems to be the same
Our varied hearts and minds can bring
A new and brighter flame

I like that phrase “new and brighter flame.”
As in enlightenment? I think that when we are able to see a different perspective it enlarges our whole beings even though at first it may make for a more tedious journey along the way. But what are we here for anyway if not to make ourselves New and Brighter Flames. Have you ever sat in a dark room with only a candle for light and gazed at it, meditated on it? I am digressing again.

For in the depths of all our souls
There lies a unique spark
That’s kindled by the world around
And glows into the dark

Actually, I think this whole poem is really cool. Do you really believe that we ALL have this unique spark within us? Do you call this spark God, encode__ecode? What is it that brings out this spark within us, I wonder? I love the stars, the ocean, he animals, the birds, so very, very much. What is that makes this spark rise up within us as individuals?

So let us not just nod and smile
But speak our minds with pride
For in the beauty of our words
A new connection may abide

Why do we need to speak with pride? How are you defining pride here? What might be a better word than pride? I am sorry. That question might be full of pride within me. We might just say with exuberance, passion, joy, a longing to discover the Truth and for others to know who we are and what we feel and vice versa.

And though we may agree on much
There’s always room to grow
By sharing thoughts and insights bright
Our knowledge overflows.

So what do we do about those who have their stuck-in-the-mud way of thinking and see no other way then their own? It just dawned on me that what I am saying is just the opposite of what you are talking about. You are talking about others usually agreeing with us.

The poem encourages us to speak our minds and share our thoughts with others, even when we think we might agree with them.

I kind of think that that might ALSO require us to go away and come back another day after we have spent time looking up at the sky and the clouds lol and contemplating the ways in which we might think differently with them and even with ourselves. You know, taking that leap into the darkness to see whatever else might be there for us…what questions, doubts, thoughts, images, et cetera, may be there for us to examine and to take hold of, by enkindling that “unique spark” you spoke of.

By doing so, we can deepen our understanding of ourselves and each other, and create new connections that enrich our lives… thank you!

Yes, most definitely. At times though, it might just upset the applecart of our beings, do you not think? But it is well worth it.

You are quite welcome.

Location: Negde u Vojvodini

Why this location. I googled it. Just curious.

[Meno2 (Meno_)]

@encode_decode

Meno_

Your words speak to the interconnectedness of all things, and the potential for there to be infinite complexity beyond our current understanding. It is true that we are limited by our sense organs and our ability to perceive certain wavelengths of light and other forms of energy. However, this does not mean that these wavelengths and energies do not exist. In fact, it is likely that there are many more forms of energy and matter that we have yet to discover and comprehend.

@Meno_

Very briefly Encode;

In that black hole perhaps rest different colored wavelength for which we have not adept sense organs to conceive that . Perhaps there is no state which has any empty spaces, all is full,

How were antithesis formed? Out of contrasting colors of black and white? The abysmal black against the white lit objects illuminated by the sun?

If so and it’s probably more likely then not, then our conscious dialectical thoughts were formed by these perceptions, and they may have differently positioned conceptions, if we were to have evolved adaptive tools which were sensitive to those missing signs of substance.

For a long time, here, been trying to double think, as if the couplets were antithetical, but maybe the time has come to reverse the ‘flow’ as you call it, by rethinking evolutionary progress.

Your thoughts on antithesis and the contrast of black and white are interesting, and it is possible that our dialectical thoughts were formed by these perceptions. However, it is also important to recognize that these perceptions are shaped by our culture, history, and individual experiences. As we continue to evolve and develop new tools and technologies, we may gain new perspectives and understandings that challenge our current ways of thinking.

Ultimately, the process of evolutionary progress is an ongoing one, and we must remain open to new ideas and experiences in order to continue to grow and evolve.

… and of course, not shut the door to the old …

Encode ,

I agree with the assessment you present, and an added observation occurred here.
As perceptions may shape primary contrasting precognitive processes of thought, cultural evolution is influenced by the primal perceptions, as in later cultural analysis, as a product of reflective processes formed on these initial images, construct these into subliminal sources, or what has developed as the ‘unconscious’

The gaps formed as the evolution proceeds at a faster rate then the neural cognitive function by which the perception of the primal processes, reduce the complexity of what you mention in the gaps produced by the formation of the ‘unawareness , imbue a simpler method of simplifying whatever complexity we are unable to process as human beings.

May be the darkness, the blackness of this complex neural pathways have from format , more distant times, blanked out complexity that the neural pathways were slowly disallowed, by reducing light, at least those parts which became unintelligable, and photochemically responded by displacing, and/ir nihilizing those parts of the nervous system accordingly.

As a stretc, but a distinct possibility, is, that our philosophical concerns with the reduction of what has been a phenomenal presence has been nihilized in a sort of reaction to prevent an overload to input the parts reaching maxi tolerance.

The natural perception makes a sort of room