foxnews.com/opinion/2015/12/ … hange.html
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=182400&hilit=Sun+God+Sun+God+climate+change
See? I’ve been on this subject for years.
Europe just got called out.
If anyone every wondered of anything ever came of your internet posting, if anyone ever read it, if it ever has accumalitive effect, know that if your me, yes it ducking does.
Under US Law, the united states is a secular state, separation if church and state. For the exact same reasons we can’t teach the creation theory in the Bible, we can’t teach global warming’s religion. It has to be based on science, and reason first.
Its impossible to soundly show that manipulation of greenhouse gases is
- Overall Benificial to the environment.
Literally consider the obstacle here… your more or less trying to prove the warmer, previous interglacial period is worst off than the Holocene, the era we are currently in (may even be exiting NATURALLY), and that climate change between interglacial periods is natural, save miraculously ours, even though the it appears about the same.
Its not even as warm as the previous interglacial period, ice caps eroded far more then, and our hominid ancestors had carbon emissions capped at fucking zero.
So what was it? Did our cave fires bring on the ice age? Was it the flaking of Flint to make spears that causes the dust originating from such activity to blot out the sky? Was it our early bronze and iron age blacksmiths who caused the glaciers to finally receed? Do you think Pythagoras was running around Italy screaming to put the fires out, it’s killing all the cold?
Fuck people, it’s only in our age that we are silly and ignorant enough to believe this nonsense. Mire of our pollution can’t even reach that high up in the air. How do I know? They can detect emissions from air liners at specific altitudes, shit in the upper atmosphere doesn’t move very much gravity wise. It also means the stuff on the ground,coincidentally, doesn’t get very high. The storms that hit North Africa, carrying red dust from Africa to the Southern US does more skyblotting than most of the worlds pollution easily. All the sand storms from dustbowls we’ve systematically eliminated from world wide agriculture aren’t flying in the air anymore.
- Absolutely no prove, zero, natta… we can change the environment in any direction we desire, via carbon emission schemes. This is absolute fucking insanity. Way, way smarter means to go about doing this if your looking for effect. An example… increasing our lengths of nights to the day… solar sail blocking the sun… closer to the sun, smaller it needs to be. Cast a shadow. Add a few hours to the night, make everyone miserable, freeze the planet. We all become Russia.
Set off nukes repeatedly on the poles… melt the ice. We can have ice chipping teams in Greenland and the Antarctic. Make that shit go away. Somehow, I think people advocating it’s either warming, or it’s cooling, will say that is a equally terrible idea, as doing that will cause the world to become either A) warmer, or B) Cooler (I can see both sides arguing the opposite with few facts) but in truth, I’m not for that.I have nothing against glaciers. But it would be far easier to quantify, and undoubtedly more effective to actually effect climate in a measurable and more certain manner than the current model of collective voodoo sacrifice at the alter of carbon emissions cuts.
We have remarkable little data on the mechanisms that cause entry and exit from interglacial periods.
POINT A… we live in a interglacial period, several preceded us, several will follow us more than likely… the forces that push these periods are larger than us, and bigger in scope than us.
Point B, with or without our particular civilization, it will change with or without us. Even If we do absurd things like systematically nuke and chip all the artic ice, live or go extinct, it will still change much as it always has, with or without us, because climate change doesn’t begin to consider us, or give a fuck about our tiny smokestacks, and can far out compete us in changing itself and destroying our best endeavors that we ever can punch back against it. Its no different from George Carlin mocking climate change. Your not going to save the earth… the earth doesn’t need saving, when it comes to you or the earth, earth always wins, and it will send a hurricane or volcano to oil your ass long before your able to anthromophize it having it’s feelings hurt because you shifted a few carbon particles from the ground to 5000 feet in the air and let them drop down again… hahahaha, the fucking concept is laughable.
Point C… this voodoo carbon balancing mission, it’s completely absurd and doesn’t serve science. Its by default dramatically unfunded, lacks crucial emperical data. I’m making the exact same case as climate scientist, for opposite reasons here… statistical climate models, which never agree and always are fucking off, aren’t enough. I have yet to see proof carbon emission systems do anything save cause economic depressions. Its the only non theological data I see. You cut carbon emissions, you cut jobs. Doesn’t stop the mantra ever, anywhere, we don’t need to cut anymore, we done it. That day will never come. It will always be more and more dire horror stories. They think it’s going to be Mad Max and the oceans will dissapear, or WaterWorld and the oceans will cover everything… or worst, half the earth floods on one side, the other half becomes desert… and Mad Max and Waterworld exists on the same planet, at the same time… all because of carbon emissions and their dire warnings we’re not heeded. What the fuck people, that’s absurd!
Point D… I severely doubt, if the interglacial period is unchangeable, in the sense it is 99.9999 going on as it was with or without us largely the same, uncaring one damn bit about us, that Reducing our carbon emissions matters one damn bit
If a big ass fucking boulder is rolling down a hill, and you have a puny pebble in it’s way (boulder being nature, pebble man"s efforts), you don’t exactly stop it whatsoever in it’s momentum by removing the pebble. Physics doesn’t work that way. If you want to stop the falling rock, if anything, it’s gonna take a he’ll of a lot more than a pebble to arrest it’s movement. Moving the pebble around left to right doesn’t change shit. The Kyoto Protocols is moving the pebbles around, and having the absurdity to think the pebbles movements caused the big rock to fall in the first place, and that we can manipulate the pebble into bribbing the big ass rick from falling ant more than it already had. That gib ass rolling boulder doesn’t care about your reasoning, it’s coming dammit, move out of the way, and adapt!
My last point… barely touched on here… we have equal ly intriguing data pointing to sun spots as the cause of climate change. Carbon emissions can’t change that. We are still in our infancy regarding climate sciences. We don’t know how natural ozone later holes are. We might always of periodically gotten them. We know the shorelines around the world go up and down, and in the last 10,000 years, had major climatic changes yoyoing about. Our human ancestors didn’t freak the fuck out, they adapted.
Global Warming activists are killing the justification to change climate for justified, easy to measure reasons. Our science can measure low altitude pollutions andbquality of life issues. As a kid, I used to go business to business sweeping up soot from the steel mills… reddish texture. Constantly dropping, the kids book “No Star Nights” chronicles the experience.
t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9 … wt0P-XWfZt
Having red, chewy air sucks. Had zero appreciable effect on global warming… how do I know? Mill is shut down, but it’s apparently as dire as ever on the BBC. But air did clean up.
Likewise, dropping chemicals in the ocean, killing the biodiversity has a much better shit at good science, as well as solutions. Take Brazil… it just unleashed a massive chemical spill from a mine, killed it’s ecosystem… or should I say it’s dying, as we speak. It won’t recover hypothetically for generations. Fucked the ocean too. I think we can competently cover this one, develop pragmatic solutions and new techniques.
And before someone starts crying about carbon footprints, I have easily one of the smallest in the western world, like Joker or Fred… I by default use very, very little electricity or natural gas. I use half solar for everything. For the environment? Ga ha ha, no… for me. I need portable, free power. Id use a pollutant if one was as cheap and efficient, but it’s not, and live a incredibly simple lifestyle. I don’t have nearly the footprint say, someone on the far left like Kropotkin has accumulated on this forum. He can lord it over me, pushing me around, mocking my Sahel sized print. I can’t begin to compete. Just because I don’t believe in your system, doesn’t mean I’m not doing a far better job than you are in terms of your own standards. I’m a fucking saint by your ecoreligion standards.
So guess what… I’ve won the forum award for mass effect. One of my posts made it big time, world media impact.
Hopefully, we will focus in time on paying attention to real climate concerns… over irrigation destroyed the Aral Sea. Nit factory burning carbon. We gotta get our priorities in a row. The countries that suck climate wise today, sucked 2000 years ago. I pray to God climate does get hit, and everyone in the Sahara has to immugrate north over the next two centuries. There isn’t anything of agricultural value, it’s all desert there… and we have far less variable landmass in these war zones that the “warming” permafrost lands of the north. We can easily accommodate refugee migrations north over a few centuries, open up new farmland, with advance, northern militaries to police the refugees until they calm down and integrate. We can label the third world off limits, unfit for human habitation, as it has been since Roman times. It wasn’t carbon emissions, but Desertification. It killed off the Granarian Civilization, and turned North Africa and Arabia into hell. We had nothing to do with it, our mist advanced technology back then was the ox drawn cart. No matter how much we manipulate our smokestacks, that desert is staying put. It doesn’t move away upon our command. Trust me, the bedouine have tried repeatedly, pleaded with the desert to leave… it’s rather disagreeable and won’t go away. Its doing it’s own fucking thing, ain’t interested in us.
Now, millions agree with me.
Chargeeeeeeee!
