Right, she is not on this forum. Women are generally not very philosophically-inclined.
I am single because I fucked up several relationships already, although that was not all my own fault. And I decided I better take a break from relationships because I know how shitty it is when they end.
One of the great women I’ve known was a friend, who was already with another person when we met. Another was someone I should have dated but didn’t at the time because I was already with someone else, and didn’t think I should end it with her at the time. I am not putting these women on a pedestal, only saying they are a lot better than the way you described all women.
These are the facts: Women are selecting losers to waste their time on. It’s that simple. I am well aware of this, thus my demeanor.
I mean look at the utter shit, the complete losers on this forum, like “futureone”, and the bitches talk with them more than me. Those guys are shit.
I’m literally rotting away, because I’m neglecting my health, because bitches would rather spend time with losers. Look at this forum. Look at my contributions. Look at theirs. They are dumb bitches.
I don’t care to be cruel. I’m not getting any love any damn way. Fuck all of you assholes.
I agree many women are selecting losers. This is a huge problem today. Women have the power of being the sexual selectors and sexual gatekeepers in society, and too many of them are abusing that power or at least dropping the ball right now.
What have you personally done to be selected by a good woman?
I’m intelligent, tall, financially secure, talented, accomplished, loyal, famous, loving, sincere, passionate and have much more going for me than any of you losers, for damn sure.
And I’m fucking rotting away because the dumb bitches don’t appreciate it.
Shit man, maybe you are right. You sound like someone who should be able to find someone worthwhile of dating. Then again another problem today is a lack of real life social encounters, are you out there in the world in ways and places that would lead to meeting a lot of people? Are you confident enough to approach a girl and ask her out or at least start a conversation? Being indoors too much and lacking confidence can impair things even if you have all that other stuff going for you.
It is always a sign that someone doesn’t want to read the content when they make this objection. The picture was made with AI, but read the text, and you’ll realise where I’m coming from.
But then again, perhaps you are afraid to introspect too!
“Are you confident enough to approach a girl and ask her out or at least start a conversation?”
If you like hotties half your age, this is a terrible problem. Why. Not because of anything stopping you and the college hottie from ravishing each other like you both really want but couldn’t dare say, but because of everyone else around you two; they think it’s inappropriate. That sexy old guy is creepy. He shouldn’t be talking to her. He’s trying to exploit her, etc. Contentious looks of disapproval from all manner of patron penetrate deep into your psyche and make you start feeling like a perv. She wants you to say something - all the signs and little gestures are there - but she doesn’t understand the awkward pressure you are under in the circumstances. She won’t tighten the fuck up, notice this, and do the thing herself kinda secretly to save you the risk of being devoured by the eyes of prowling envy. No. She sits there like a dumbell stretchin’ 'n shit so her boobs stick all out ‘n playin with her hair and all that ‘please fuck me you sexy sugar daddy’ stuff she’s doin’. The only way to breach the force-field placed between us by the people is to slip her a note with something like “i want a sugar baby and you 'n me would make an excellent team… text me if you want…”
It’s suffering unlike anything you will ever know, and i experience it almost daily. Everybody else gets in the way. I can suck the Eros right outta a girl and have her ready to drop her drawers… but the persecuting eyes of the covetous indict us both on charges of immorality and indecency. What unmitigated audacity!
Yes. They are young women you fuckwit. My grandmother married at 16. Was her husband a paedophile? Young women now are having sex because that’s what they want to do. I’m just stating facts. What fucking universe are you living in? Most govts. recognise this which is why most countries have 16 as the age of consent. I know plenty of women who’ve taken their promiscuous FIFTEN year old daughters off to abortion clinics. You can live in your little puritan bubble but it has nothing to do with reality.
A PAEDOPHILE is a man who rapes two year olds, new born babies, toddlers you dipshit. Now we know what YOU are.
I would have definitely found Epstein very attractive when I was 16, and it would have been perfectly legal for me to have sex with him from my sixteenth birthday. Would that have made him a ‘paedophile’ the day before? I was often attracted to older men as a teenager.
What a load of crap. If she’s half your age then that puts her in her twenties. Why would anyone give a shit? Look at Leonardo Dicaprio. Why do people just assume the women aren’t attracted to these men? When did women become pathetic little victims who are never sexually attracted to anyone?
I don’t care if your grandma got pregnant when she was a kid. Lots of people got pregnant when they were kids back in those days. At ages younger than 16 too, are you going to call them adults too?
I guess a 13 year old who gets pregnant is an adult in your eyes. Pathetic.
It’s not a child and paedophiles are child rapists. It’s a despicable and politically motivated misuse of the word. Why are Americans so bloody thick? Is it in the water? No. That can’t be it. It’s all that excrement you call food that you shove down your throats daily. You should all be forbidden from speaking English.
Try stopping 16 and 17 year old ‘toddlers’ from having sex then. Good luck with that.
There is a word for men who are attracted to very young women and that’s ‘ephebophile’, but since that’s probably pretty much all straight men and is much harder to remember than ‘paedophile’ they go for the latter for the dramatic effect and to feign moral outrage.
Obviously it’s in the interest of ‘someone’ in a very high place to have the word ‘paedophile’ used constantly in that particular case. Journalists tend to know what words actually mean, so the orders are coming from high up, and we all know that perversion and depravity is rampant in high places. Take away the meaning of a word like that and it takes the heat off actual paedophiles.
‘Minor’ and ‘child’ are not synonyms or interchangeable. All children are minors, but not all minors are children. The definition of ‘minor’ changes depending on the situation. You can have sex in most countries at 16, but not vote or drink in a pub. You can drive at 16 but you can’t sign a contract etc. etc.
You are using the word ‘kid’ in an emotive, opinion-based way. In the few places where the age of consent is 18, are you suggesting that anyone who has sex with a 17 year old is a paedophile? They might well be a paedophile as well, but that particular act was NOT paedophilia.
Philosophy is supposed to be about logic and critical thinking. Try harder.
Out of curiosity, what do you think is cringeworthy about pointing out the fact that lacking confidence or staying indoors too much can be barriers to dating?
