I’m not sure I understand this. As far as I know, there isn’t any ‘shade of grey’. It’s one or the other, not both.
For me, the notion of free will seems odd. It seems there are two ways to go about a solution to free will or the lack thereof:
Everything is predictable and predetermined. Meaning no free will.
At the basic level, everything is chaotic, resulting in random outcomes.
Number one obviously obliterates any chance of free will. And does the second, truely, genuinely, give you free will? It seems to me to be more of a dice roll than the ability to choose what the outcome of the dice might be.
My explanation goes as follows:
The rise of our consciousness allows for the consciousness to believe it can choose. While the actual choice is predetermined, and the consciousness unable to see deep enough to where the choice is coming from, it assumes the choice manifested from within itself. Determinism wins when looking at it from this angle. The appearance or illusion of free will may seem like choice - but it isn’t.
If you are observing someone making a choice, then you cannot predict the choice and, within parameters, it’s a random outcome. If you’re the one making the choice, then it’s a genuine choice.
Funny how one is asked to split the matter of free will vs determinism by choosing between the two. Cough cough.
Whenever I’m asked to speculate about this issue vacuumed from any sort of context, I feel slightly embarrassed to even begin. As if my opinions or arguments were really that decisive in establishing such dichotomial crap.
Free will or determinism ? I say we wait and see. I think it was Kierkegaard who said that life can be understood only backwards, but we have to live it forwards.
My brain starts to ferment at this “independent of external causes.” I can’t make sense of it.
I think this topic is overrated. Modern science seems generally committed to causal determinism (that awkward business of quantum mechanics notwithstanding). Whether, in fact, all future events are necessitated by past and present events or not, this has virtually no bearing on my experience of choice, of free will. I will still choose whether or not to get up in the morning. Whether I really choose or not is perhaps interesting and relevent to science but not to my experience. Let the physicists do their stuff.
The question is a false dichotomy. Free will and determinism do not compare. Atoms, particles, things are determined. The will is an abstract concept, and is free on that level.
I am, therefor, the unlisted third choice: Compatibilism