Free will Vs math

Free will Vs math

We begin with a myriad of ever-changing inputs from the senses, and from that as interpreted signals in the brain.

Q. mathematically, is it possible to take that mass of continually changing information, and translate it exactly onto the macroscopic scale?

  1. It would be very difficult to even arrive at freeze-frame of all input, so as to deduct an exact set of informations.

  2. There is no single source to that set it comes from all the senses, at different times and locations, the information doesn’t arrive at once.

  3. When the brain samples and calibrates the different sensory inputs, it is mapping an already imperfect set of informations onto an ‘image’ representative of the given sets.

  4. This primary image - let us say, of each sensory field of information is then sampled, calibrated and further combined onto a tertiary image of the combined sensory map.

  5. This merged secondary image [prior to the perceived world we experience] is kept partially separated, such that we can perceive the different field individually, hence is never a complete image.

  6. The final tertiary image is our perceived world; some of us would say that this is purely composed of quale [vision, sound, feel, emotion, language, thought, awareness] mapped against the aforementioned third image. Some would say the perception is the final physical layer.

Either way we have a multilayered scenario rather than a direct deterministic link from environmental input, to perceived world.

.

An interesting view I would like to cite Immanuel Kant on this as the idea seems to bring to mind hard determinism. Such a mathematical problem however indicates the problem of free will which in tern gives us the idea of combatbilism. I am more inclined to believe combatibilism as opposed to a black and white view of mathematical engineered view of determinism since it would stem an idea of self hypnosis. In addition our understanding of hypnosis is that it can be rejected by free will thus concluding a view more stem in hard determinism that may be some what more elusive when we consider chaos theory in all applications of corresponding free will that may change a deterministic outcome. It is this reason I doubt such mathematical precision of logical deduction can predict time and human behavior.

youtube.com/watch?v=rzpL_5CI0WQ

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_determinism

youtube.com/watch?v=B8_dgqfPXFg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory