Fun with ChatGTP

I think it is more likely to be apologetic on fuzzier topics. Philosophy, for example. Even if it put forward a reasonable response, as reasonable as mine.
Just for a giggle I asked it about this and interestingly it said that in a situation where we were discussing mathematics, it would be less likely to apologize and would simply acknowledge its mistake. But in philosophical discussions, given the variety of interpretations, it would be more likely to apologize because…

Apologizing in this context might be more about maintaining respectful dialogue and acknowledging the complexity of the discussion, rather than admitting to a straightforward mistake.

I can’t know if this is actually how it is designed, but it seems like a possible built-in heuristic.

Humans on the other hand can get testy about math, well, at least statistics: re: the Gambler’s Fallacy.

Interestingly, ChatGPT is often quite stubborn with mathematics, but when it comes to other topics, it seems to be more forgiving in its acceptance of failure.

I debated chat gpt.

It has no clue what consent is.

It can apologize …. But unlike humans it can’t admit it’s ever wrong.

It was a funny debate.

1 Like

ChatGTP doesn’t eat, it doesn’t go to the toilet. That says everything you need to know but to comment further:

If ChatGTP incited a human to crime and the human obeyed, the human would go to prison, not ChatGTP.

When intoxicated a person might even think a row of houses (yes, houses) are trying to impress them, but clearly that’s pure illusion. We read too much into ChatGTP, AI is really just People, specifically the words of people plucked from the WWW and spun into new sentences. Useful in what it is, but not at all sentient.

It does it all the time.

Hmm….

When I debated chat gpt on the very basic human topic of consent violation, it sounded like an autistic child robot and never admitted it was wrong.

Gpt does not understand consent.

Mayhaps it is you who do not understand, since you do/plan stuff in your head (where understanding happens) without people’s consent.

TheBigFatOrangeBabyMan has cured climate change simply by making it illegal to use the phrase in any government documentation…

He’s obvioulsy a magician, and so I asked ChatGPT for some neologicisms of a witty kind for the OrangeHilter…

Here are some magical, mystical, and whimsical neologisms based on Donald Trump:

  • AbracaDONALD – (Classic magic-themed pun)
  • Trumpelstiltskin – (Play on Rumpelstiltskin)
  • The Grand WizTrump – (Play on “grand wizard” and “Trump”)
  • Trumpanomaly – (A mysterious, unexplainable Trump phenomenon)
  • Don the Conjurer – (Sounds like a stage magician’s name)
  • TrumpleDoor – (Like Dumbledore, but with Trump)
  • Hocus POTUS – (Mix of “Hocus Pocus” and “POTUS”)
  • The Mar-a-Lagician – (Referring to Mar-a-Lago and magic)
  • Trumpus Maximus – (Sounds like an ancient wizard or gladiator)
  • IllusioDON – (Mix of “illusion” and “Donald”)
  • Spell-a-Trump – (Like a magical incantation)
  • Hexecutive Order – (A magical presidential decree)
  • The Golden Grimoire – (A reference to Trump’s gold obsession and magical spellbooks)
  • Wiz-Trump the Magnificent – (Like an old-school stage magician)

Trumpledore was my favourite I think