Galiton, race, genetics and American idealist lies.

[Dan1 (Dan~)]

Sir Francis Galton (1865, 1869), Darwin’s cousin, immediately recognized the implications for human variation. Galton carried out surveys and found that good and bad temperament, as well as intelligence, ran in families. He discovered the phenomenon of regression-to-the mean and the implication that family variation was heritable.

 Galton also reviewed accounts contrasting the taciturn reserve of American Indians with the talkative impulsivity of Africans. He noted that these temperamental differences persisted regardless of climate (from the frozen north through the equator), religion, language, or political system (whether self-ruled or governed by the Spanish, Portuguese, English, or French). Anticipating later work on transracial adoption, Galton pointed out that the majority of individuals adhered to their racial type, even if they were raised by white settlers. 




 Based on his readings and his personal experiences of exploring Southwest Africa, Galton concluded that the average mental ability of Africans was low, whether they were observed in Africa or in the Americas. In Descent, Darwin acknowledged Galton's work and also accepted the importance of the brain-size differences reported between Africans and Europeans by Paul Broca and other nineteenth- century scientists. 




 Modern studies confirm Darwin and Galton. The races do differ in average brain size and intelligence. The racial gradient in average intelligence and brain size increases from Africans to Europeans to East Asians. 




 Although Darwinians emerged victorious among the educated classes in their nineteenth-century battles against Biblical theology, subsequently they lost that ground to egalitarians, Marxists, cultural-relativists, and postmodernists. From Herbert Spencer (1851) to the world depressions of the late 1920s and 1930s, while the political right was ascendant, the political left came to believe, perhaps correctly, that "survival of the fittest" was incompatible with social equality.

Although POR was being a retard when insulting the Asian race, it must be noted that some races are basically “better” then others.

If the jelious, bitchy, hypersensative, postmodernist mass did not take this as an insult to them, but as a compliment to their natural betters, I’m sure that “insult” could be replaced by the word “fact”…

[Twilight_of_the_Idol (Twilight of the Idols)]

@Dan~

Although POR was being a retard when insulting the Asian race, it must be noted that some races are basically “better” then others.

Damn, that’s weird. Even before reading this, I was going to mention that you are quickly becoming the next PoR. Different, to be sure, but the similarites are growing.

[Dan1 (Dan~)]

@Daybreak

@Dan~

Although POR was being a retard when insulting the Asian race, it must be noted that some races are basically “better” then others.

Damn, that’s weird. Even before reading this, I was going to mention that you are quickly becoming the next PoR. Different, to be sure, but the similarites are growing.

Yeah, my evil spells will make your first borns die if you don’t put bloodz up on your doorz. My evil IQ test n brain-size/skull-size facts will cause gnats to fly up yo’ Egyptian azz!
I am holy prophet Darwin.

[detrop]

Can a retarded child feel joy, Dan? Probably. We can see him smile and laugh. Is not the point of existence to experience pleasure? Do we need fifteen hundred different ideologies to argue the nature of pleasure and pain? Surely not…because one’s body is not a “philosopher.” Eat a cheeto and tell me it doesn’t taste good when it does, or that is does taste good when it doesn’t. You can’t, because your body is not a philosopher. You cannot “out-think” pleasure and pain.

It is quite unfortunate that Hitler lost the war, yes, but the same ideals he sought after are inevitable anyway, only they can be achieved through different means. The “nationalism” he tried to establish would have evolved into a communism, only there would be a smaller variety of races participating in it. So in an ironic sense, although Hitler seemed to be a trouble-maker, he was actually paving the way for an evolution which was inevitable anyway. If Hitler won the war, we could’ve skipped global capitalism altogether. He was a “short-cut,” so to speak.

Eugenics is inevitable as well. When religion (which is the cause of all the problems) finally becomes extinct, it will become a scientific tradition. Breeding stronger more intelligent people will be common place.

Just have some patience. If these ideals are not achieved, the world will be destroyed, and rightly so. Perhaps next time, in some far off galaxy, life will start on another rock and get it right this time.

[Uniqor]

The fittest survives, is theoretically impecable, its failure in being seemingly empirically inapplicable does not imply that the weak should be re-designated as the strong, thereby Darwin could be smashed upsidedown. The saying that “arogance defeats” does not necessarily imply that arogance generates internal failure, but most of the time it is that arogance initiates external opposition. The quantitative accumulation of the weak force can never reach the qualitative level of the strong force. The way we measure the success of a species, a group or an economy, is often based in quantitative terms. This is the source of the misunderstanding. Theories remain untouched by this kind of pseudo-refutations.

If the world is left to its natural course, the fittest will survive and triumph. the Jews were doing exceedingly well in Germany after Luther, until the Hitler killed six million of them. The Jews have been left untouched in America and as a result, they are already proven to be triumphant. The weak has born weak will to power, this will is often reminded to be ashamed of itself, yet does not know how to attain strength. It strives to become strong in such a manner so that the strong will to power is quantitatively outdone. Qualitatively the strong will remain to be the strong irrespective of quantitative phenomana. Jews are exceptionally intellegent among the other middle-eastern nations. You can bet on it that some of the fattest Arab oil-pipers have Jewish blood. The same goes for Europeans. Darwin is proved precisely here in the most concret way.

Nietzsche was absolutely enlightened by his sheer genius to have remarked, in aphorisms 260 to 280 of The Daybreak, that “a drop of Chinese blood will do the Europeans much good”, of course, with drops of Jewish blood as well. Nietzsche hereby elaborates Darwin in the homosapien geno domain, by cross examining culture with physiology.

[Uniqor]

However of course, this Nietzschean elaboration upon Darwin does not mean that Nietzsche saw a certain ethnical groups as absolutely superior than others. The drop of foreign boold into the domestic pool is not an aimed towards adding strength, as if strength in genes is something that can be added. As afromentioned that strength is not quantitatively accumulated but rather qualitatively resulted. Nietzsche wanted a cancellation process achieving elevation, a chemistry experimentation upon inheritant vices and virtues, culturally as well as physiologically. It is something of the matter of balance. He spoke of “inner conflicts due to mixed blood” that give birth to strong and high men. He meant absorbing and benefiting from variety, from organising enriched chaos. The hybrid human being is more intellegent physiologically due to vast geno variance in blood, but also could he be cultrally rich which would be reflected in his personality and spirit. This is the extension out of the biological domain, or rather, a connection from philosophy toward science, for we can use this example to aid the ground postulate that physis and the rest is but one.

[Dan1 (Dan~)]

@détrop

Can a retarded child feel joy, Dan? Probably. We can see him smile and laugh. Is not the point of existence to experience pleasure? Do we need fifteen hundred different ideologies to argue the nature of pleasure and pain? Surely not…because one’s body is not a “philosopher.” Eat a cheeto and tell me it doesn’t taste good when it does, or that is does taste good when it doesn’t. You can’t, because your body is not a philosopher. You cannot “out-think” pleasure and pain.

Surely, Comrade Detrop.
But if I actually had the freedom to choose how I was born, I would most likely choose the highest IQ and strength as possible.
Genetic engineering and preselection would be a great gift to the children of the future.

It is quite unfortunate that Hitler lost the war, yes, but the same ideals he sought after are inevitable anyway, only they can be achieved through different means.

I would be careful about such a strange subject…
What if the soviets won the cold war?

Hitler had made a vast mistake, in his oppression of potential comrades.

The “nationalism” he tried to establish would have evolved into a communism, only there would be a smaller variety of races participating in it. So in an ironic sense, although Hitler seemed to be a trouble-maker, he was actually paving the way for an evolution which was inevitable anyway. If Hitler won the war, we could’ve skipped global capitalism altogether. He was a “short-cut,” so to speak.

One of his greatest ideas was practice of genetics upon the people, and a real responsability for the future of the German children, but the war was terrible…

Eugenics is inevitable as well. When religion (which is the cause of all the problems) finally becomes extinct, it will become a scientific tradition. Breeding stronger more intelligent people will be common place.

Don’t be so sure, comrade.detrop… The people love their traditions, and they have a tradition of freebirth. Only if culture and tradition can be redirected by a wise hand, will the children of the future get a better chance. More likely, I would guess that cyborg upgrades/attachments within Asia and USA will be coming before anybody were to wake up and realize the value of proper breeding.

Just have some patience. If these ideals are not achieved, the world will be destroyed, and rightly so. Perhaps next time, in some far off galaxy, life will start on another rock and get it right this time.

Life has already started on many rocks, from what I can tell, comrade detrop. The problem now is the mobilization of the people, each for himself instead of the human future. Competition between the capitolists makes for competition and disunity within the people, and noone feels loved by the state at all! The first step should be a revolution of culture and the media, by what ever means possible – and once that is done, the people will force a better system and a better government to come… but I feel it would only be a dream, not a reality…

Perhaps in the dark days to come, the workers may really unite, and take control of their employers…

[Dan1 (Dan~)]

@Uniqor

However of course, this Nietzschean elaboration upon Darwin does not mean that Nietzsche saw a certain ethnical groups as absolutely superior than others. The drop of foreign boold into the domestic pool is not an aimed towards adding strength, as if strength in genes is something that can be added. As afromentioned that strength is not quantitatively accumulated but rather qualitatively resulted. Nietzsche wanted a cancellation process achieving elevation, a chemistry experimentation upon inheritant vices and virtues, culturally as well as physiologically. It is something of the matter of balance. He spoke of “inner conflicts due to mixed blood” that give birth to strong and high men. He meant absorbing and benefiting from variety, from organising enriched chaos. The hybrid human being is more intellegent physiologically due to vast geno variance in blood, but also could he be cultrally rich which would be reflected in his personality and spirit. This is the extension out of the biological domain, or rather, a connection from philosophy toward science, for we can use this example to aid the ground postulate that physis and the rest is but one.

Comprade Uniqor, oh god if I had a nation…

Ofcourse I would love heterosis of the people. I would give ritch rewards to all East-Asian imigrants! Even the language would be tought to them for free upon arival, if they wished it to be so.

Each civilian would have their IQ, character, strength, health and beliefs on file… I would select the best of the best, comrade Uniqor…
Today the “dating services” are capitolist, and they are a joke! And a sick joke at that. I would have before me a socialist breeding program, finely tuned for a greater future.