Male independence is the direct product of being the expendable gender. When you are expendable (because you were born male, worthless) then the onus is upon you to develop “self-worth” over time. This is also why males commit most of the suicides; because many males fail to develop self-worth and have nothing to lose. It becomes depressing being worthless. So some males readily kill themselves. Or in times of war, males throw their lives away, being mowed down by machine guns.
Female dependence is the direct product of being the privileged gender. When are you privileged-protected-prized (because you were born female, valuable) then there is no onus to develop “self-worth” over time, because you already are valuable. Women don’t need to “become independent”. Rather the female half of the specie spends a lot of time and energy on protecting and maintaining their current privileges. This is why Pandora, and other women, act innocent and defensive of their privileged status. Innocence/Ignorance is a form of protection. Lying is a form of protection. The valuable half of the specie doesn’t want to admit to, will never admit to, being privileged. Because admitting being privileged, makes your privilege a target. It’s inviting disaster. If you are privileged, then you don’t go around announcing it to everybody. That’s just stupid and reckless. So as everybody can see, Pandora isn’t going to simply admit that females are the privileged gender. I don’t think any woman would.
Females are dependent on “The System”, on society, on the government. Because all these institutions further exist, as a primary motivation, to ensure the continued privilege of women and children. That is one of the core functions of The State, in the first place. So obviously, women will be politically “Statists” while males are more rebellious, distrusting of the state, and want to overthrow it, or start their own.
If you learn the nature of Privilege, then you can understand the female gender for what it is.
Females are inherently invested into a system, into a society, into a state. Women are the “pro-government” and pro-order half of the human specie. Because the states, the societies, the systems, all protect women, and their female-privilege.
When men come to a new area, or conquer a territory, they develop a more “masculine” form of law, state, and order. So the creation and beginning of any State, is going to start out as masculine, but degenerate over time. Beginning States are masculine. But they become feminine over time. Because the inner-working of States, revolve around innate privileges. Privilege is Power. Read this again. Privilege is Power. Read it a third time, because I know most of you noobs don’t really take something in unless it’s repeated over and over and over again. Privilege is Power. Women know this fact very well, as the female half of the specie has been accumulating power, not only recently, but over the last million years. Women have been accumulating power over countless millenniums.
Privilege/Power does not appear out of nowhere, obviously.
What is the favored way women gain Privilege/Power. Through men. Through manipulating men. And through manipulating men, using sex. Women viscerally understand the power of their pussies. If women keep their legs shut, then men become frustrated, and will become useful puppets. Men begin doing whatever they can, a sign of desperation, to get that sex, to open the legs up. Women use men like puppets, based on this sexual need. Women learned long ago that they could trade sex for money, straight-out, long ago. Prostitution is the oldest profession. But most women are more discrete and conniving. Women use relationships, twisting emotions, to gain far more from men than merely prostitution.
Women act innocent, as a means to protect their privilege. Smarter women are very aware of what they’re doing, if not why they’re doing it. Smart, beautiful women, know how to get what they want, from men. And they also know which men are headed ‘upward’ in terms of social mobility. Smarter, beautiful women, will cling to the ‘upward’ moving males, to gain position in society. This is the basis of “Social Mobility”, the moving up of Class. It’s difficult to move upward in society. It’s easy to fall down. It’s easy to give up. It’s easy to lose everything. Women know this, and are in a better (privileged) position to secure areas of class, and sections of society.
Males have more social mobility. In other words, males move up and down society faster than women. Because women think permanently. Women want to move ‘up’ permanently. Women also move down slowly. If a powerful man cheats on his wife, or a powerful man dies, then a woman knows she is headed ‘down’ in society. But she will slow-fall. Women have safety-nets, to prevent a complete collapse of social positioning.
Pandora is only focused on the simplest aspects of her privilege. It’s amateur. I’m ready for a deeper discussion about all this. But I need a better Antagonist, a better counter-argument.
I’m ready to go all the way, in terms of discussion and philosophy. I need an ‘Equal’ half. I need somebody who can stand toe-to-toe with me. So we can see where all these premises and observations lead to.
I’d like to, but I don’t have time to hunt them down. I did well enough to find this post!
What planet do you live on? Ask any tall guy why he is with a short girl and he’ll say “Idk, it just worked out that way.” It’s the women pushing for it; the guys will take short or tall with no preference. On the other hand, women under 5’4" would rather be celibate than date a guy less than 6ft.
No, just the short ones. Under 5’4".
Women can’t think that far ahead. They think they need protection by their spouse, not from their spouse, which is the reality of it. No woman realistically is going to be attacked in public, but she’s much more likely to be attacked by her jolly giant at home.
Fault has nothing to do with anything. What exists is what is.
It wouldn’t change anything since the females would let each other go and persecute the men.
That would be nice, but it won’t happen because women apparently eat it up or men wouldn’t do it.
Well then that wouldn’t have been a fair fight. On a equal playing field, the woman has the advantage.
What if there is no family?
That’s a good point. That was mom’s situation. She had planned to be a mother and wife, not to enter the job market. She put my dad through college and invested in him, then was left to her own defenses while he gallivanted off with his degree and good job. Mom didn’t use her powers in court though; she was fair and it bit her in the ass.
The gay population is something like 1 or 2%, so it’s still nothing like the female power.
You don’t have to sleep with a man to have sexual allure.
It’s annoying to you because you haven’t accurately interpreted what I said and therefore you’re being annoyed by your own hallucination. If you could really relate, then you would not be annoyed.
I don’t have many billionaires rubbing their wealth in my face, but does that mean they don’t have more power than I because they do not flaunt it?
That reaction is predicated on the previous lapse of reason that I corrected above.
I have no idea about any of that.
Women objectify themselves with tons of makeup, clothes, jewels, etc and having little depth other than what’s fashionable.
You’re being unreasonable and irrational. There is a difference in having the potential to be a hooker and actually being a hooker. I do not have that option because I am not a woman, but maybe you do.
This is like saying a martial artist has potential to kill someone, but never would resort to that while someone else does not have the capability or knowledge of how to kill anyone regardless if they actually would. Just because someone CAN be a hooker, doesn’t mean they are or will or would. But it means they have power that I do not have that could be applied in other ways besides hooking.
You are definitely a woman!
Where did I say women should not have equal rights? I’m bitching about the men treating them like goddesses, which is the source of their power. If men would treat them as equal instead of objects of worship, then I’d have nothing to complain about.
The cop should cite the woman instead of trying to bag her or feeling sorry for her because she is the “weaker sex”. Guys should stop holding doors for women as if they are any less capable of managing a door. Guys shouldn’t be expected to pay for dinner. But you see the problem is that if any guy tries to treat a woman as equal, she will disregard him for the guys who work harder for it by: holding her door, buying her dinner, and generally doing for her that which he would not do for guys.
Women eat it up! They LOVE ass kissing! But if women really knew what was going on in a guy’s head that motivates him to dote on her, she’d be offended. The enemies of the future are always the very nicest people.
I conducted a small survey once and found no women who didn’t agree that the men who were the meanest at the end were the nicest at the beginning.
I think you’re right. You know, you guys are a real POW. I haven’t seen so much whining coming from males in one place in a long time! So I concede, you win this whine fest! This is really more whining than I can handle.
As a woman, I’m too irrational for this conversation, and so blinded by own innate female privilege, I simply cannot comprehend your so-called “objective” reasoning. But I guess, that will be my burden to carry. Or maybe it’s actually man’s. Yes, it’s all a man’s burden to carry. In fact, all of it. Everything. All you have to do now is restore patriarchy, so everybody’s in their rightful “objective” place and we can go back to whatever we were doing before all this feminist crap came along. You know, innovating, reproducing, expanding our turf (bc it’s what we naturally do) …all that good stuff.
And if anybody talks about privilege then they must be whining.
Nice logical fallacy. I bet that makes you feel good and tingly, able to sleep at night, huh? If anybody questions MUH PRIVILEGE then they are the bad people, not me.
Wives don’t appreciate shit, they take their husbands for granted, and younger girls are usually in better shape and way more DTF. Fucking an old woman or an out of shape woman is a chore that only happens when someone is desperate. Fucking a younger girl who’s in shape is like…the main mission in life when it comes to sex.
Love the generalities. LIke husbands are so great at ‘appreciating shit’ and are always in shape. But the sad thing is what underlies the desire to have a less experienced lover who you care less about. Actually that two sad things.
I’m speaking from my own perspective. So like…I don’t care what husbands do. And less experienced…I have a friend who does this thing. He only wants to date like super old ladies because he’s got mommy issues as well as that he’s intimidated by hotter, younger girls. So he always says, “yeah man but those older women know what they’re doing”. To which I reply, “You don’t think a 28 year old athletic hottie knows what she’s doing?”. It’s not like it takes 45 years to learn how to fuck.
Well, gosh, the demographics in your area are really weird, becuase everywhere i lived there were woman my own age, regardless of my age. So, oddly, I didn’t have to choose between women or girls I guess younger than me OR women my mother’s age…
but whatever false dichotomies justify your having less intimate sex, with less experienced women, who you might be able to connect with in more ways before and after sex. Yeah, those 28 year olds learn nothing on the way to 32 35 etc.
But I get it. Fucking an idea is an easy controllable goal. All that intimate shit with more experienced equals is pretty fucking scary shit. Hell, you might even find yourself not calling one of them a ho…
chaos, emotions
actually developing through the challenge of a real mate.
Don’t be a hater. I’ve fucked bitches my own age, a few here and there that are older. If it’s in shape, has a vagina and is willing I’m down. And not all sex is about being in love with some bitch and listening to enya while caressing each other and shit. Sometimes you want to wear one out and sometimes that’s what they want as well.
The girl in the audience is the thumbnail guys girlfriend, the people in the comments are completely freaking out. He is discussing his irritated bowels and setting the alarm for sex because of their schedules. People can’t handle this ancient pair-type anymore these days, the imagination runs too wild. But programs like these are here to keep our ears at sea level.
Christianity wasn’t the cause of puritanism but a symptom of it. Puritanism was in turn a relation to decadence.
Better to accept things as they are, it makes the reaction to them a lot more beautiful.
LOL. Trendy accusation. I know, you too cool for that, you all into disdain and pretending and shit.
I can only go by how you present yourself and the range of options you seem to think exist. If you present me with false dilemmas, you can blame yourself. And it’s really cool that you’ve fucked bitches. I mean, you got style.
‘It’? God, I hope you don’t have daughters, or sons for that matter.
Well, be sure to mention that to someone who needs to hear it but I don’t. If all you do is fuck ‘it’ and ‘bitches’ you avoiding something, on the other hand. Or pretending to be some idiot who’s avoiding something. We can only go with the 'BS persona you present…ya feel me?
