Some people would say that only certain kinds of darwinism created the races.
I’m wondering of the races were the subject of eugenics instead of regular natural selection.
Because of men wanting to do service to women, and protect them with their life,
they take the lead and the front line when it comes to dangers and labors.
Men are not very picky. All it takes is one rich and aggressive man in old culture,
to buy a bunch of wives to birth a bunch of sons, or some daughters for sale.
RIchness and aggression being the determining factor for female pregnancy.
The result is bad genes get into things.
Things like civil war reduce the tard count of rich aggressive people, at times.
OR, they conquer some places and get even richer and more female slave-wives.
I’m wondering what factors contribute to genetic decay especially female genetic decay.
There is an expression I’ve heard, that if we are not improving, we are then degenerating.
One idea is that races are subjects of eugenics, not natural selection.
Therefor unusual and unnatural properties can arise.
For example, according to darwinism, you’re supposed to reproduce, and want to reproduce, and want to protect the child.
Instead, someone doesn’t like sex as much, they don’t want to have a family, they want abortions, etc.
These ideas are not humanly natural ideas.
So maybe some crazy guys made white women especially to be imbred.
By giving women the keys to play with all the men in civilization has gotten us to this point. It was a mistake then as it is now.
Women are irrational creatures and ought not to have any influence whatsoever in anything. I will not apologize for this comment either. I’m unapologetic for saying so.
Other factors of overall weakness in human beings overtime is that we lack in this society any great numbers of natural predators.
Sure, human beings prey upon one another but it has become quite minimal under the modern technological police state.
Without any natural predators guarantees all kinds of fragility or weakness becomes inherent. We’ve become too sheltered, protected, and domesticated overall.
As for the racial component of the discussion white women are utterly damning. They are the worst to contend with and it’s the very reason why I don’t have a problem miscegenating with other races of women as an alternative. [Although other ethnicities of women are following their suit and aren’t all that much better really.]
They have very little to no children whatsoever. They’re anti family, materialistic, snobby, and completely oblivious. Their fertility rates are so low you might as well describe them as infertile. There should be something in the descriptive phenomenal lexicon known as white women sub replacement population fertility disorder. If you’re a hardcore European nationalist, unless you can get European women to pop out more children your whole entire identity of self is screwed where you should prepare yourself to become the next endangered species. Western civilization is done, it’s finished. It’s over. Stick a fork in it. Prepare to kiss your own ass goodbye.
Many white women are gay or desensitized to sex altogether as well. There’s that also.
Very frustrating and depressing but, what the fuck are you going to do?
Couldn’t get them to lie down and spread their legs all the livelong day, eh Triple H?
Dan, I’m not sure we really recognise race as an evolutionary category nowadays, do we? Or maybe I’m misreading you. Certainly, I don’t really think the category of race is all that informative a term for describing differences between humans, certainly not from the perspective of decay, although I again am struggling with your meaning.
Some things make us better as a species.
Some things make us worse as a species.
If there is a fad for blue eyed women, for example, and they are the ones that get to reproduce,
then it shapes the future and makes humans more blue eyed.
That’s just an example.
So is decay the consequence of homogenisation, in that sense? The gene pool becomes too narrow?
I’m not sure human procreation, at least since the advent of anatomically modern humans, has ever been that focused. In other words, brown, green and grey-eyed girls have always got theirs as well…
I think that eugenics is a form of natural selection when it comes to human attraction. Men do not universally take the lead when it comes to dangers and labors. Many seek to copulate and leave because what men are after is not the responsibility of a late intention like romantic love, but the sure short them pleasure of a quickie.
Again, since entire towns were at this “one rich and aggressive man” and since even his resources were limited, a lot of decision went into from whom to buy a daughter. But I give you this: such exchanges were not directed by eugenics, but there were always indiscretions with other women which were, even if those children were of low birth, thus depriving them of any survival advantage. This brings me to another problem: the category of fitness, which is prone to a lot of interpretation. Also your sharp distinction between decay and improvement seems a false dichotomy leaving, willfully but unnecessarily, the concept of equilibrium.
Not necessarily. You assume that only bad genes were available in the wives exchange group which is not demonstrated by what has been premised. Perhaps you wish to add another premise? Fine, but try to justify it in some way because otherwise this all seems like a giant plastic doll, inflated by your opinions, in order to help you relieve yourself.
This is not scientific. I think you should narrow your scope to a specific genetic mutation such as cancer or sickle cell. It is, even then, unlikely that some genetic decay is traceable to a sex and you deal here with percentages and probabilities rather than straight causation which would pin point the source of degeneration. In a closed community where there is a lot of inbreeding (which could explain the prevalence of the rich aggressive type) a genetic mutation could be spread easy, but there are rare. In general, communities have border racially diverse communities leading to intermarriages, sanction or unsanctioned.
