Speech in America ain’t free.
Sanders is the conscience of the US Senate.
1 Like
This is what is happening in Gaza
This is what is happening in the USA in violation of our First Amendment Rights
It’s crazy and a sign of how powerful Zionism has become, that this is even possible. One day, we will realise that the belief of the Zionists, that they are “chosen people”, goes beyond the Nazi “Herrenrasse”!
The enemy is traditionalism…
Anything that destroys traditionalism, including Islam, is a means.
Modernity, postmodernity, is the objective.
Alienation from reality - zombification.
The west is infected by a parasitical meme, i.e., ideology.
The UK’s support for Syria is multifaceted, driven by humanitarian concerns, national security interests, and a desire for a peaceful political transition. The UK has provided substantial financial aid, including over £4.3 billion since 2012, to help Syrians inside and outside Syria, focusing on food, healthcare, and support for displaced populations. The UK also participates in counterterrorism efforts, like Operation SHADER within the Global Coalition against Daesh, and supports diplomatic efforts for a peaceful political solution. Additionally, the UK is working with international partners to support the protection of human rights, access for humanitarian aid, and the combatting of terrorism and extremism.
In an interview, reflecting on his past affiliation with al-Qaeda, on U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the Palestinian cause, al-Sharaa, the current president of Syria commented in the interview:
The history of the region and what it went through over the past 20 or 30 years needs to be taken into consideration… We are talking about a region ruled by tyrants, by people who rule with iron fists and their security apparatuses. At the same time, this region is surrounded by numerous conflicts and wars… We can’t take a segment of this history and say so-and-so joined Al Qaeda. There are thousands of people who joined Al Qaeda, but let us ask what was the reason behind these people joining Al Qaeda? That’s the question. Are the U.S. policies after World War II toward the region partially responsibility for driving people towards Al Qaeda organization? And are the European policies in the region responsible for the reactions of people who sympathize with the Palestinian cause or with the way the Zionist regime deals with the Palestinians?.. are the broken and oppressed peoples who had to endure what happened in Iraq, for example, or in Afghanistan, are they responsible..?.. our involvement with Al Qaeda in the past was an era, and it ended, and even at that time when we were with Al Qaeda, we were against external attacks, and it’s completely against our policies to carry out external operations from Syria to target European or American people. This was not part of our calculations at all, and we did not do it at all.
1 Like
Reagan funded the Contras, Bush funded the Taliban and Obama funded ISIS so I guess the UK just wants to join in the party.
1 Like
https://youtu.be/TMqJQE9yoe0?si=PbM0pF-Ox7O5X6Hg
The above video is an interview with British Israeli historian Avi Shlaim who self identifies as an Arab-Jew from Iraq who’s family was “conscripted into the Zionist project” in 1950 and who now supports a one state solution. He thinks Zionism is imploding from within. He says the genocide in Gaza is the crime of the 21st century.
Meanwhile, there is a rift growing between Netanyahu and Trump.
“With President Donald Trump set to head to the Middle East in the coming days, and the next round of Iran talks being held this weekend, there are growing signs of friction between the United States and its closest ally in the Middle East.
“The apparent divisions are especially notable in the context of the Iran talks — Israel largely opposes diplomacy with the regime and favors a military option to address Iran’s nuclear program, on which the Trump administration has not yet been willing to cooperate.
“A series of recent developments, public comments and reports point to evidence of a growing disconnect between the two sides.
“Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had been scheduled to travel to Israel this week for talks before meeting Trump in Saudi Arabia, but no longer plans to do so, instead traveling with Trump, Defense Department Spokesperson Sean Parnell said, while saying Hegseth “did not cancel his trip to Israel.”
“Despite a reported push from the Israeli government to add a stop in Israel to Trump’s Middle East junket, he is currently only expected to visit Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
“Ha’aretz reported that the Trump administration is “heavily pressuring” Israel to make a deal with Hamas before Trump’s regional trip, and “communicating to Jerusalem that if Israel does not move forward together with the United States toward an agreement, it will be left on its own.” It also reported that U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff told hostage families this week that Israeli military pressure is endangering their loved ones.
Alleged Palestinian girl being starved to death in Gaza (NSFW):
The UK government, under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is not actively supporting Syria’s current regime or any specific faction within the country. Instead, the government is focusing on: 1) Acknowledging the fall of the Assad regime and welcoming the establishment of a new leadership in Syria. 2) Prioritizing the protection of civilians and promoting a peaceful transition with the new authorities. 3) Encouraging a credible, inclusive, and non-sectarian governance to benefit all Syrians. 4) Supporting efforts to rebuild the Syrian state and safeguard national unity, while respecting the rights of minorities.
Whatever you think about Gaza you have to admit there is a very clear, very powerful valuing at work in Judaism. I never had anything against Jewish people but I am certainly skeptical of the Zionist elements within it, which seem psychopathological at minimum controlling most of American policy and pushing ends not exactly to the benefit of the dominant culture in western nations historically proving that European ethic peoples can turn hostile to Jewish subpopulations within their midst. It makes sense, and Kevin MacDonald has enumerated this very well. Jewish influence in western ‘white european’ culture and politics is well known enough to no longer evoke any kind of “whaaaaaaaat???” reaction from most people. The same logic they use as justification can and should be used by all others who find themselves harmed by certain policies or actions, that is basic selfvaluing logic.
Jewish families take care of each other, I have seen this. They value each other positively in ethnocentric and familial terms, which is a very high order of valuing and may be inclined to devalue non-similar persons or groups beyond an earned friendship of mutual respect and shared values. In particular I notice this ethnocentrism coexists alongside what might otherwise be deemed objectively greater levels of analytic powers… revealing that we are not talking about some merely vestigial thing here, an evolutionary trend of some kind but rather something nobler, maybe aristocratic bent. Lets also not forget that in computer models, the group that ends up cominating the grid is not the one with compassion/cooperation with others but the one that exhibits both positive and negative ethnocentrism. Whether that is a fluke or limit in nature, or a philosophical question worth exploring, who really knows. If I don’t then you probably don’t either.
It could be why they may not care so much what happens to others beyond their circle of immediate concern.Another place where this sort of ethos appears: America. Most Americans couldn’t and do not give a shit whatever is happening anywhere else in the world, beyond a certain radius of miles out from where they currently live. This interests me. It makes sense both as a reaction to desperation and threat, for a relatively small group pushed into higher level positive and negative ethnocentrism as a condition of survival, but it also makes sense as a kind of residual hangover from accumulated decadences. What an interesting ouroboros this makes. Then again America too has its nobility, born of fierce and hard-won freedomlove and a lack of need to really care about much beyond that sphere or beyond the limits of their own eastern and western coasts.
What if the freedomlove indicating narcissistic developments and increasing ethnocentrism indicates a broader psych-cultural development and trend within the necessary? What if characteristics are less geoculturally located and more philosophically tempered by truth-conditions that may appear differently in different locales, possibly for very diffrent reasons, yet isomorphic nonetheless. Isometries of the soul… there are depths here in this topic that have not been sought at the expense of emotional headlines.
No doubt that’s true. I confess the situation overwhelms my poor intellect. But, I think it deserves our attention and I refuse to just look away as I agree with you many Americans seem to want to do.
I reject the idea that condemning the way Israel is conducting the war in Gaza is necessarily antisemitism. I know plenty of Jews who think that it is genocide.
I think the modern state of Israel was a mistake that came out of European colonization of the Middle East. But, that”s history. As I understand it the colonizers promised two states but reneged on the promise. For 77 years they’ve been talking about a two state solution. I don’t condone Palestinian violence. But, the way they have suffered under Israeli rule is intolerable.
I pray for peace in the Middle East, but I can’t imagine a realistic path to peace between Israeli’s and Palestinians at this point in time. The Gaza war is one of the worst atrocities of this century.
With the rising popularity of Hitler in response to modern Jewish politics (Kanye’s song Heil Hitler is a great hit with the alt right), I state the previously obvious that it would’ve been better for Europe if European Jews had been allowed their increasingly assimilated lives there. Europe would be stronger now, people like Einstein wouldn’t have fled, a great deal of intellect wouldn’t have been killed off… certain Jewish anti-European agendas wouldn’t exist, so there would be less sabotage… further, Israel would possibly still have come into being, but not have been as aggressive, most likely. They wouldn’t have the moralist leverage.
Of course rejecting Israels war is not antisemitism. They’ve pushed this narrative and other tactics way too far, and their pushing now seems to be backfiring, if this is true things are changing very quickly all of a sudden.
1 Like