Germany Increasingly Stopping Refugees

The UK spent much on ist military during the 1930s too, but it did not have the capacity of spending more than Germany.

No, that’s the whole point. The UK had drastically reduced its spending. Chamberlain’s “peace in our time” deal was a ruse to buy time so we could re-arm. It bought us about 18 months, in which we frantically built up the RAF to defeat Hitler’s invasion.

A people is always at its best not during periods of war or peace, but of re-armament. Thats when they pull their shit together.

So nothing creates stronger bonds than preparing to go to war. Nothing is more beautiful than watching a million people in a nationalistic fervor scurry about to gather their weapons. Tell me there is a better scene in any movie. You cant. Not the victory, not the defeat, the preparation for war… that’s the moment the people shine the most.

The big speech and then all he soldiers go “arugha!” and smack the edge of their shields with their weapons. That’s what I’m talkin’ bout.

That is not true. In addition: The UK and France did not want Germany to spend much on its military. Then - the more the world had become globalistic - the UK and France noticed that they - bit by bit - had to spend more on their military than Germany on its. And what was their conclusion? “Germany must spend more money on its military!” That is odd. What has Germany been doing since then? Germany spend more money on its military again. So what you are critizising is nothing more than “peanuts”, a bagatelle. You have to value it in the longer term.

I don’t think anyone in Europe would be happy with Germany having a big military, and as soon as it gets too big for confort, I’m sure they would put a stop to it somehow. Perhaps, instead, Germany can give the money it would otherwise spend on its military to help fund other countries’ economies? So instead of giving a mere 9 billion to the EU, it could give, say, 90 billion? Those other countries could then spend the money how they wish, including on defence.

I did not mean Chamberlain but Churchill, the warmonger.

You? Okay, you needed alomost all nations of the world, especially the nations USA and USSR, to defeat Hitler’s invasion, because Hitler stopped the invasion of the Uk in order to invade the USSR and the USA. The whole world against Germany!

Utter nonsense. All other countries profit from Germany, because Germany pays the most by far - 40 times more than the UK, for example, as I already said several times.

And again:

When the UK and France noticed that they - bit by bit - had to spend more on their military than Germany on its, they demanded immediately: “Germany must spend more money on its military!” That is odd. What has Germany been doing since then? Germany has been spending more money on its military again since then. So what you are critizising is nothing more than “peanuts”, a bagatelle. You have to value it in the longer term.

What nonsense. It gave Germany access to all the weapons in Czechoslovakia, which were then used in Poland and France. In other words, Germany got an arsenal of weapons for free, while the British had to fabricate their own. Chamberlain was completely manipulated. That’s why he is a symbol of stupidity and incompetence.

That is when they have that high goal that pulls them into momentous harmony, not killing each other, but each willing to bend in order to work together and accomplish.

That it what is at the heart of all actual “progress” - the Perception of Hope and Threat, PHT.

The Pharaohs of old learned that they had to have a pyramid to build in order to maintain order, a heart felt cause (aka “blood”). Moses used the same thing, PHT, merely in the direction of more easily obtained entropy to decimate the order. But entropy does not make a healthy bedfellow. Thus they eventually fell into their own demise for merely the same reason on a higher level.

These people needed to study perpetual motion laws more carefully. The ouroboros dies … only because it isn’t really designed right, but close.

:laughing:

Czechoslovakian weapons (like arrows and bents) were not needed. The German military industry was strong enough, much stronger than that of the UK. 6 years agaist the whole world - that is merely possible with a huge military industry, a good military (army, organization, … etc.), economical and administrative system. By the way: The current Germany has still a huge military industry and also still a good economical and administrativ system, but the difference to earlier times is that Germany exports its weapons, especially to the USA and to Israel. :wink:

Not only is that insulting, it is completely wrong.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_oc … hoslovakia

Oh, Phyllo, that are again “peanuts”!

Your Fuhrer did not think so.

This place is a den of stupidity. There is no other way to describe it. :frowning:

Insulting? … - Okay, “my” Führer did not need that weapons - regardless what your “interpretation” is.

You know almost nothing about history and even worse … you don’t want to learn.

That is again your self-description, Phyllo. Thanks.

The realiity is almost always war or peace as a break (pause) of war but not really harmony - unfortunately.

Germany lost WW2.