Globulism

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

Take two or more solid statues of morons, break them up into powder. Then glue them back together into the form of a single larger moron.

That is the thought that is running your world, “Globulism” (aka “Globalism”).

Each organization in society is basically like a single subatomic particle. It has its devoted polarity and within is merely a great deal of noise dedicated to perfecting its polarity. The particle/organization reaches a peak wherein it can’t really get any more polarized as new participants replace old participants. Catholics, Muslims, and Judists are examples, as well as Liberals and Conservatives. Anarchism is about destroying them all.

The idea of Globalism is to destroy all such groups (through anarchism and confusion) and from their ashes, form a “Brave New World”, united under one leadership, an Ubermensch/Overseer.

In physics, it is the idea of merging an electron with a proton in order to produce a neutron. In that way, there is no contention between the electron and proton, no warring. All distinction is removed. It is merely one big glob of noise dedicated to remaining a single glob of noise, a “stable single particle void of charge potential”. No distinction allowed between beliefs, between colors, between genders, between types. All are one… and the same.

Wars and arguments are reduced to merely individual competitions that gain nothing and are immediately replaced by more of the same, also gaining nothing, a pointless struggle to gain nothing… endlessly because there is no potential to do otherwise. Potential requires differences and distinctions.

So okay. THEN what are they going to do?
What is life with no potential and no distinction?
Mis-perceived potential can keep people busy for their entire life, struggling in unseen futility. Mankind, a pointless and endless struggle to remain a noisy glob with no potential. But then what happens when all of Mankind has need to accomplish something, but void of actual potential to do anything? Where is his Life and ability to defend himself?

2

Do you honestly think grouping will stop ever? Its natural to form groups. Look at school uniforms in public schools. They were started to stop grouping / cliques. It does not work. If homogenizing kids does not work how can it work on more stubborn set adults? I won’t. It will be done to some measure sure but, not even remotely like they want.

3

Well, I hope not.
In your mind are those the only options; grouping or not grouping?
How many kinds of groups can you make out of 7 billion people?
1 or 0?

They certainly seem to be getting “what they want”.
Look at “women’s lib”.
Look at the families (other than yours).
Look at the cultures.
Look at the religions.
Look at the political parties.
Look at races.
Look at the television programs.
Look at the automobiles.
Look at the dress.

Sure there will always be “some difference”.
It would be impossible to have zero differences.
The objective is to ensure that there can be no significant differences such that any group could accomplish anything that wasn’t chosen by the leadership. In effect, that makes “the leadership” the only actual life on the planet, everything else is merely subservient to it. And before long that “leadership” will become a single person (as it always has… for a reason).

Grouping itself is certainly not the problem. The problem is the singularity of it, a single group without enough variety and distinction to handle anything that the leader didn’t expect. And long before that, the species called homosapian will be long extinct merely because he couldn’t compete in being as identical and trustworthy as required by “the leadership”.

The grouping that replaces organic life is another topic.

4

I know what you’re talking about but I’ve always found this observation quite simplistic, politically speaking. ‘No distinction allowed’ for whom? Because they still see themselves as distinct from us:
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6057734.stm

While the dissolution of color, gender, race and so on is one very important means for them to advance their desired society, don’t kid yourself that they don’t also use the exact opposite means too. You want clarity - you are failing to distinguish between mechanisms (which can be contradictory and still successful) and aims (which cannot). It is no surprise that you blame ‘socialism’ for EVERYTHING.

5

Such as?

Entropy causes likeness in all things.
It isn’t easy to thwart entropy.

6

How will they ever stop competitive games?

7

Why would they stop competitive games?
“They” use such games (remember the Roman Collosium and now UFC).

8

Gladio, the strategy of tension, polarising discussion, divide and conquer…

9 
Now? Well, real hunger games!
10

For globalization as you put it , competition would have to be eliminated, byby Olympics and other international and national sports and competitions. Any sort of competition.

11

How do you figure that?
Leaders throughout history have always figured the opposite.

12

Leaders in this want passive humans. These are not the same type of leaders. Can you honestly say they are the same?

13

No. They don’t want passive humans.
They want humans that are very passionate… and easily persuaded.
They love women for that reason.

14

Then globalism will not ever work so why sweat it. Passionate humans are feral humans. Uncontrollable and violent that especially includes women.

15

…and yet being controlled.

16

Yes and no.