God and the Kingdom of Heaven

The sentiments herein expressed by Tolstoy are so sublime and enlightening that I am obliged to bring the passage to your attention:

Jesus in his childhood spoke of God as his Father.

There was in Judea at that time a prophet named John, who preached the coming of God on earth. He said that if people changed their way of life, considered all men equal, and instead of injuring, helped one another, God would appear and His Kingdom would be established on earth.

Having heard this preaching, Jesus withdrew into the desert to consider the
meaning of man’s life and his relation to the infinite origin of all, called
God. Jesus recognized as his Father that infinite source of being whom John
called God.

Having stayed in the desert for some days without food, Jesus suffered hunger and thought within himself.

As a son of God Almighty I ought to be all-powerful as He is, but now that I want to eat and cannot create bread to satisfy my hunger, I see that I am not all-powerful. But to this reflection he made answer: I cannot make bread out of stones, but I can refrain from eating, and so, though I am not all-powerful in the body I am all-powerful in spirit and can quell the body. Therefore I am a son of God not through the flesh but through the spirit.

Then he said to himself: I am a son of the spirit. Let me therefore renounce the body and do away with it. But to this he replied: I am born as spirit embodied in flesh. Such is the will of my Father and I must not resist His will. But—(he went on thinking)—if I can neither satisfy the needs of my body nor free myself from it, then I ought to devote myself to the body and enjoy all the pleasures it can afford me. But to this he replied: I cannot satisfy the needs of my body, and cannot rid myself of it; but my life is all-powerful in that it is the spirit of my Father. Therefore in my body I should serve the spirit, my Father, and work for Him alone.

And becoming convinced that man’s true life lies only in the spirit of the Father, Jesus left the desert and began to declare this teaching to men. He said that the spirit dwelt in him, that henceforth the heavens were open and the powers of heaven brought to man, and a free and boundless life had begun for man, and that all men, however unfortunate in the body, might be happy.

The Jews who considered themselves Orthodox worshipped an external God, whom they regarded as creator and ruler of the universe.

According to their teaching this external God had made an agreement with them by which He had promised to help them if they would worship Him. A chief condition of this alliance was the keeping of Saturday, the Sabbath.

But Jesus said: The Sabbath is a human institution. That man should live in the spirit is more than all external ceremonies. Like all external forms of religion the keeping of the Sabbath involves a delusion. You are forbidden to do anything on the Sabbath, but good actions should always be done and if keeping the Sabbath hinders the doing of a good action then the keeping of the Sabbath is an error.

According to the Orthodox Jews another condition of the agreement with God was avoidance of intercourse with unbelievers. Of this Jesus said that God desires not sacrifice to Himself, but that men should love one another.

Yet another condition of the agreement related to rules for washing and purifying, as to which Jesus said that what God demands is not external cleanliness, but pity and love towards man. He also said that external rules are harmful, and that the church tradition is itself an evil. Their church tradition set aside the most important things, such as love for one’s mother and father-and justified this by its traditional railings.

Of all the external regulations of the old law defining the cases in which a man was considered to have defiled himself, Jesus said: Know all of you, that nothing from outside can defile a man, only what he thinks and does can defile him.

After this Jesus went to Jerusalem, the city considered holy, and entered into the temple where the Orthodox considered that God Himself dwelt, and there he said that it was useless to offer God sacrifices, that man is more important than a temple, and that our only duty is to love our neighbour and help him. Furthermore Jesus taught that it is not necessary to worship God in any particular place, but to serve the Father in spirit and in deed. The spirit cannot be seen or shown. The spirit is man’s consciousness of his son-ship to the Infinite Spirit. No temple is necessary. The true temple is the society of men united in love. He said that all external worship of God is not only false and injurious when it conduces to wrong-doing—(like the Jew’s worship which prescribed killing as a punishment—and allowed the neglect of parents)—but also because a man performing external rites accounts himself righteous and free from the need of doing what love demands. He said that only he seeks what is good and does good deeds, who feels his own imperfections. To do good deeds a man must be conscious of his own faults, but external worship leads to a false self-satisfaction. All external worship is unnecessary, and should be thrown aside.

Deeds of love are incompatible with ceremonial performances, and good cannot be done in that way. [b]Man is a spiritual son of God and should therefore serve the Father in spirit.[b]

John’s pupils asked Jesus what he meant by his ‘kingdom of heaven’ and he answered them: The heaven I preach is the same as that preached by John-that all men, however poor, may be happy.

And Jesus said to the people: John is the first prophet to preach to men a Kingdom of God which is not of the external world, but in the soul of man. The Orthodox went to hear John, but understood nothing because they know only what they have themselves invented about an external God; they teach their inventions and are astonished that no one pays heed to them. But John preached the truth of the Kingdom of God within us, and therefore he did more than anybody before him. By his teaching the law and the prophets, and all external forms of worship, are superseded. Since he taught, it has been made clear that the Kingdom of God is
in man’s soul.

The beginning and the end of everything is the soul of man. Every man, though he realizes that he was conceived by a bodily father in his mother’s womb, is conscious also that he has within him a spirit that is free, intelligent, and independent of the body.

That eternal spirit proceeding from the infinite is the origin of all and is what we call God. We know Him only as we recognize Him within ourselves. That spirit is the source of our life; we must rank it above everything and by it we must live. By making it the basis of our life we obtain true and everlasting life. The Father-spirit who has given that spirit to man cannot have sent it to deceive men-that while conscious of everlasting life in themselves they should lose it. This infinite spirit in man must have been given that through him men should have an infinite life. Therefore the man who conceives of this spirit as his life has infinite life, while a man who does not so conceive it has no true life. Men can themselves choose life or death: life in the spirit, or death in the flesh. The life of the spirit is goodness and light: the life of the flesh is evil and darkness. To believe in the spirit means to do good deeds; to disbelieve means to do evil. Goodness is life, evil is death. God-an external creator, the beginning of all beginnings-we do not know. Our conception of Him can only be this: that He has sown the spirit in men as a sower sows his seed, everywhere, not discriminating as to what part of the field; and the seed that falls on good ground grows, but what falls on sterile ground perishes. The spirit alone gives life to men, and it depends on them to preserve it or lose it. For the spirit, evil does not exist. Evil is an illusion of life. There is only that which lives and that which does not live.

Thus the world presents itself to all men, and each man has a consciousness of the kingdom of heaven in his soul. Each one can of his own free will enter that kingdom or not. To enter it he must believe in the life of the spirit, for he who believes in that life has everlasting life.

(My Bold)

god doesnt exist. [-X

PW,

Beautifully presented. It is the essence of what so many of us have been trying to say, regardless religion.

oldphil

You say, “god doesnt exist.”

Sure, I agree, that god doesn’t exist—(I know that already!)—but I wasn’t talking about that particular god that doesn’t exist, I was talking about the one that does exist!

Do you know the god that does exist or have you not yet awoken to him?

Hi JT

I came across these truly profound words and thought they might be of use or aid to those who like myself are embarked on the search for meaning and truth.

That’s why I posted them.

Pleased to see they had some resonance with you!

Peter

Hi PSW,

This doesn’t sound like Tolstoy at all. I could have written it perhaps, but Tolstoy? The sentence asks more questions than it answers. Why “Father”? Why “his” Father? What is an infinite source of being”? How did Jesus come to “recognise” an “infinite source of being” as anything but an “infinite source of being”?

Both Jochanan and Yeshua (or Jehoshua) were brought up by pious Jewish parents, could there be anything mysterious to that which Jochanan called “God” (or Elohim in the vernacular), or was it “Alaha”, or “I am”? I’m afraid the whole article begins with bad writing.

Why should anybody in their right mind think like this? The text jumps to new assumptions and just ignores them as it goes along. The writer of this text is also the Author of “War and Peace” and “Anna Karenina” as well as numerous other works? I still find it hard to believe, unless he was writing it on his death-bed, convulsing under pain. Or perhaps he wrote it as an eleven or twelve year old ….

Shalom

I hope you don’t mind me sticking my nose in and answering this question.

I’m still “asleep” - have you got anything short and snappy to “wake me up” with? It would be a shame if I were to die and go to hell for the want of a “wake up call” !

Hi Bob!

Luke 2.49 “And he” [12 year old Jesus] “said unto them,[his parents] How is it that ye sought me? Wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business?”

Surely, Bob, Jesus was not talking about his earthly father, Joseph, was He?

An infinite source of being is surely something that exists outside time and space such as that animating principle in men that allows them to perceive, to understand, to allegorise, and to reflect upon the world, the self, existence.

The “article” does not begin there. You can get a free copy of the 53,000 word Gospel in Brief here: geocities.com/cmcarpenter28/Works/gospel.txt

Regards,

Peter

ChimneySweep

Sorry, I don’t think you’re being genuine with me therefore I’d prefer not to respond to your piece of, what, “philosophical,” burlesque?

Regards,

Peter

Bob is Islamic, in their belif jesus is a prophet not the son of god, But then acording to what you have written isn’t all man the son of God?

With the exception of possibly me and tentative everyone else that has posted as of yet, has not grasp’s the concept’s listed in the post.

It was a very good read and as tentative said explains details that have been unexplained or rather explained over and over and misread or understood. Of course some do not have sight with which to see these perceptions…

I think more Christian’s should read that and take it to heart instead of trying to pick it apart. They may find their God is not a being at all (at least not in the terms they believe) but merly the spirit within the self or the self in which believing in self gtrants life and saying the self does not exist grants death. As such this being the self is omnipotent in itself and it’s existance.

I think I have been argueing this point for quite some time now…

The Watcher

Yes, Muslims regard Jesus, (Isa,) as an Islamic prophet.

I’m in agreement with Tolstoy and see all men as sons of one heavenly Father. People, most people, it seems, haven’t got an idea in hell of what I’m talking about.

There are so many overtones when you say, “son of God,” knowing which understanding is the right one is the problem. In a way, all implications and understandings are right if viewed as part of an ongoing process of individual development, (that is, for those of us who see our lives as journeys in search of truth and meaning.) But at different stages of our lives we have different understandings of our purpose.

The understanding of God is like a mystery that unfolds very slowly for most of us. There are so many layers to the idea of, for instance, “son of God.”

I am an old man, I will have a different understanding to a young man, a different understanding to that I had when I was a young man.

But there are many paths through the forest. Each man must follow his own.

For me the heavenly Father is the very core of my being. He courses through my spiritual veins. I choose rather to be a son of His spirit than a son of the flesh. God is like the noumenal side of me, the undifferentiated One.

I’m pleased, Watcher, that you have grasped the concepts listed in the post.

One attempts to raise the dead, help the blind to see and the deaf to hear, but in mostly in vain!

I agree with you absolutely. Everything you say makes sense. (I hope I haven’t misunderstood what you’re saying.) Yes, believing in this spirit/self does grant the gift - not of the bodily life but of spirit life-everlasting which has no temporal or spatial bounds; those who deny it are indeed the dead, not physically dead, but spiritually dead!

Regards,

Peter

It sounds odd, but I really never quite understood the message Jesus of Nazareth brought until I looked at it through the lense of Taoist thought. Raised in a christian home, i rejected the message because I didn’t understand it. Once I saw past the language to the meaning beneath, it became clear to me. It was then I could let go of religion and attend to my path. There are indeed other ways to see our spiritual nature, and if one sees clearly, then the language, the metaphors, all the explanations become adjuncts. The reality is the One. And the same for every person.

Well said. I enjoyed reading this. It is so difficult to put in to words the nature of the spirit and its inherant connection to Him.

I also enjoyed reading the story. Thanks, Phrygian.

Personally, I have always regarded the “spirit” in us as not God, but as an extention of God: the soul. I believe the soul is our conduit to God, the means by which we communicate with Him. This would tend to contest the Watcher’s post about God being the spirit within us. Anyone want to pick this argument apart?