No, you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist and you are a non illusion rather than an illusion eodnhoj7.You claim that everything that you claim is a misrepresentation of reality so I shouldn’t believe anything you say.Thanks for the heads up.
I never claimed I don’t exist….I am not making claims about illusion either….
You exist and you are a representation of reality,a non illusion who claims to be misrepresentation of reality,an illusion.
There is no actual absence of Y. You are merely limiting existence in attempt to declare Y’s absence.
Y is a thing, Y is present. You perceive Y, you reference Y. X is a thing, X is present. You perceive X, you reference X.
Relative nothingness itself is a thing, a conceptual mechanism. You perceive it, you reference it.
Absence itself is a thing. A condition or circumstance. You perceive it, you reference it.
All of those are things; all of those instances concern thingness, not nothing, not nothingness. Even the concept of relative nothingness is a thing, a concept, which is perceived.
Nowhere in the equation is actual nothing or nothingness referenced.
If all there is is existence then existence is all things, not nothing (no thing).
It includes that very notion of “nothing” itself. As expressed, nonexistence or nothing is conceptual. It is abstraction, constructed in the mind and projected outward through concept and language.
Nothing, nothingness and nonexistence are conceptual mechanisms. Conceptual mechanisms employed by conscious beings, specifically advanced organisms like human beings, to help process information.
This has already been discussed on the other forum:
https://canzookia.com/viewtopic.php?p=654347#p654347
https://canzookia.com/viewtopic.php?p=784489#p784489
Distinction does not transcend existence as distinction always concerns existence. Every possible reference is to existence; even nonexistence itself is conceptual, a conceptual aspect of existence.
Existence is all, including any hierarchical apex.
Existence is all things.
Your statement in no way refutes the ontology. As expressed, existence includes paradox.
That’s not a dualism because nonexistence is nothing.
Paradox or opposition doesn’t mean the oppositions all hold, doesn’t mean apparent contradictions are real, and doesn’t mean all distinctions necessarily cancel out.
X and Y exist because X and Y need to exist to claim that they don’t exist.If X or Y claim that they don’t exist then X or Y are merely liars that exist.
You are a representation of reality (a non illusion) who claims to be a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion).
If you want to remain trapped in binary then that’s up to you.
X/Y=X/Y
You are a representation of reality (a non illusion) who claims to be a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) Ichthus.
This is the processing limits of a lifeless biological machine programmed with binary software.
John 3.
If there is a car and where a car is is the non-existence of the tree then non-existence exists.
So I will start with point one and address point one and then address the other points as this resolves rather than have a page long post on either of our parts.
You claim there is no absence of Y where X is. Is that correct? So by that logic a tree is where a car is as the tree is not absent where the car is…..is that correct?
Car exists, more like.
Cars exist yes. Same with trees. But does a tree exist in the same limits (same space) as a car? If not the car is a relative absence of there being a tree where the limits of the car are.
If both a car and tree exist as the same space you have equivocation. If not the space of the car is the absence of the space of the tree as the car.
1 Like
What is even going on here?
Obviously cars and trees exist. Is anyone saying they would exist in the same space? That would be weird.
Everything exists but not everything has life.
The physical body biological machine exists in the VOID and picks up (via its antenna senses) and converts varying frequency analogue waves of energy (emitted from all external vibrating matter which has its own binary code footprint ) into binary electrical signals (because the machine is an analogue to digital converter).The machine then converts these electrical signals into sounds,visions and sensations which the metaphysical SELF interprets.All this is possible because attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes are balanced out throughout the cosmos by the philosophical formula N/S=N/S.This is the only way that binary code can be produced in the cosmos so no other forces are required.This formula explains how all matter is held together,how mass is balanced out,why all matter levitates in space.Spinning particles create energy,the amount of energy produced being dependent upon the the spin speed of particles because it’s the spin speed of particles which determines the frequency of the balanced NN,NS,SN,SS electromagnetic force interactions between any two particles and thus the intensity of the electromagnetic energy waves emitted.
it’s all in your head
You are right for once ….Ichthus……Many Many individuals disappear into their heads and rely TOTALLY!!! on inward only meditation…..they disconnect from the sense touch and outward meditation…they don’t understand consciousness you see….and neither do mainstream cognitively biased pseudoscientists (who misrepresent reality with their philosophical nonsense theories).They even acknowledge that they don’t understand consciousness….it’s their “hard problem”…..it’s about time we stop listening to these individuals who admit that they are psychotic…they are religious cranks/crack pots who don’t acknowledge the human make up fully.
Buddhism practices inward only meditation ….is it any wonder therefore that there is a statue of the god Shiva proudly displayed outside the religious cult of mainstream cognitively biased pseudoscience’s HQ at CERN near Geneva.
Mainstream misrepresentation of reality pseudoscience doesn’t understand consciousness or REALITY!!!...because it only acknowledges inward only (meditation) consciousness.It claims that everything is a misrepresentation of reality….LOL!!! ….the claims of this religious cult are ridiculous and all of its science has failed.
You came in late. The argument is that non-existence actually exists.
There is A.
A is the absence of B and the presence of A.
Wherever there is a presence there is the localized absence of other things.
The “head” is a distinction within the empirical world.
You always seem upset….
Non-existence ‘exists’ insofar as certain things are not present where other things are present. An elephant does not exist in my office room at this moment in time. So what? That basic and obvious fact is hardly philosophically significant. As if we ought to assume everything exists everywhere simultaneously in the same place and time?
You mean Non life “EXISTS” , not Non-existence ProfessorX.
SELF is present…