You want an answer from the God-did-it poeple. Am I one of those, or are you looking for a more orthodox explanation?
I started out believing in science and morality. When the idea of God existing did not seem to fit in that perspective, I thought it was not reasonable to believe God exists. Even now, I only think its an uncertainty with uncertain probabilities on each side.
For God to have done it, God must have done it in a way that created a world that fits with our studied observations of the world (science).
For God to have done it, God must have done it as God (within the confines of what a morally perfect, omniscient, omnipotent being would do).
I think people tend to underestimate God’s omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence. If God exists, then I believe God would have created every possible world that could have existed before there was a God. That would mean not interfering with any possible set of natural laws in ways that would not have happened in the absence of God. On the other hand, where natural laws allow for multiple possible results (as in quantum mechanics), God causes all of the possible results to occur (branching parallel universes).
I did say God may have had some involvement in causing the universe (or some precursor to it). That would mean that God has some causal role in the origin of life, albeit not direct causality.
But in any event, life most likely did form from ordinary molecules via ordinary chemical processes.
But that does not mean life created itself…
Rather, life on this planet most likely came to exist as a result of ordinary chemical processes.
I believe that is the conclusion folks generally come to when they approach the question under the guidance of the scientific method which is itself designed under the guidance of the golden rule.
Responsibility in belief entails disbelief in the kind of magic and miracles that amount to exceptions to natural laws.
We cannot know if a god did or didn’t…at least not the one which most currently believe in.
But Something obviously did. How many universes backwards in time do you think we need to travel to before an answer is found?
Ordinary molecules? ![-X Define ordinary!!
And at what point did they become ordinary?!
No, it had Earth’s processes to move it along…
just as the embryo has the host body.
Evolutionist Michael Denton: “The complexity of the simplest known type of cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together suddenly by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable, event. Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle.”
Famed researcher Sir Fred Hoyle is in agreement with Creationists on this point. He has reportedly said that supposing the first cell originated by chance is like believing “a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.”
The notion that… the operating programme of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial soup here on the Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order.
—Evolutionist Sir Fred Hoyle
My name is Evening - not Eve. I came to be aeons before Eve. Believe? Where does believing get us?
I have no idea how it happened.
But there are many, many theories written in books and on the mind.
My theory is just that there is/was this incredible unknowable Something that just could not stand the pressure of its own non-existence in a vacuum - it needed to release - and boy, did it ever Release.
And thus, the stage was set for all energy to run rampant.
And here you and i are today, energy running rampant.