God doesn't play dice: cause and effect

Philosophy Forums Science, Technology, and Math
1

God doesn’t play dice: cause and effect
(causality and dependence)

Einstein said “God doesn’t play dice” because he didn’t accept
the probabilistic arguments of quantum theory. He thought
that behind the probabilistic arguments of quantum theory some
real process is hidden. This real process makes the situation
probabilistic. Thinking so - Einstein wasn’t alone.
P. Langevin told, that to speak about crash of unity between
cause and effect is ‘ intellectual lechery’. And Lorentz,
de Broglie, Schrodinger believed that the situation in the
micro world can be explained in details. All of them considered
that the particles and fields exist in real space and time and they
can move from one point to another. And this situation is possible
to describe not only probabilistically but in details too.

But other group of scientists didn’t agree with them.
Their leaders, Bohr and Heisenberg, said in micro world we must
refuse to describe particle’s behaviour to the smallest detail.
Here is enough to use Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle.
Most scientists agreed with them saying: ‘There isn’t better
interpretation quantum physics than Heisenberg’s ’.
From time to time somebody tried to give new interpretation
and explanation quantum situation (more concrete ) but without
success. And at last Feynman said: ‘I think I can safely say
that nobody understands quantum mechanics.’ And somebody
agreed with him saying, we cannot understand, but we can
accustomed to it.
Yes, they accustomed to the paradoxical quantum micro world
and now, developing it, they created new paradoxes ( quarks,
dark matter/ energy, string theory, new particles, new dimensions
and new symmetries . . .and etc)

I try to understand the situation.
1.
We have dualistic particle as a ‘ math point’.
2.
We have two kinds of space:
a) Minkowski ( -4D) and a its shadow -
b) separate independent space and independent time (3D+t)
3.
The dualistic particle/wave point can move from one point
to other, or (maybe) from one space (-4D) to another (3D+t).

This situation was known from 1908 but it still is unsolved.
Is this situation hard puzzle ?
Isn’t clear that we need to know: dualism of particle,(-4D )
and its shadow – (3D+ t) to solve this puzzle – problem ?
But these categories of being scientists try no debate now.
Why?
Maybe they are busy solving other problems . . . and . . .
. . . create new paradoxes . . … . . . . . I don’t know.

I remember that about 50 years ago I have read one interesting
book. Maybe this book will help me to understand the situation.
I must reread it again.
Where is it? Here it is:
Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus: ‘The Praise of Folly.’
===============.
All the best.
Socratus.

2

I always imagined that if we were to determine the shape of dimensions like we do today, it could be determined in the following order, starting from the first (I use the term “dimension” to describe the number of linear or circumferential measurements needed to complete a measurement):

Group 1:

Single Original existence (Requiring 1 dimension)
Single Origin Planar existence (Requiring 2 dimensions)
Single Origin Spatial existence (Requiring 3 dimensions)
Single Origin Linear/Chronological existence (Requiring 4 dimensions)
Single Origin Radial Linear/Chronological existence (Requiring 5 dimensions)

Group 2:

Single Layered Multiple Origin Radial Linear/Chronological existence (Requiring 6 dimensions)
Multiple Layered Multiple Origin Radial Linear/Chronological existence (Requiring 7 dimensions)
Single Origin Multiple Layered Multiple Origin Radial Linear/Chronological existence (Requiring 8 dimensions)

Group 3:

Multiple Origin Multiple Layered Multiple Origin Radial Linear/Chronological existence (Requiring 9 dimensions)

In not so many words I believe dimensions are like “Matryoshka”, and actually existing only up to 9. I suppose the possibilities are endless but this is what is essentially paralleled in Gnosticism, that there is a description of the 9th dimension (“The kingdom of the Father” in the books) and there is everything beneath it. If you observe the pattern carefully, the universe has been carefully crafted so as to ensure the full reaping of knowledge. In the books, the 8 dimensions were arranged in this way so as to mimic the “fullness” of the 9th. So if the 9th is actually understood as I described, then the universe that was forged from the 9th (Ours) must have a way of containing the perfection that the 9th always had. From any given origin in the 9th, it is believed that all the knowledge that could have come from this variable of existence will come, else the motion of that energy (In the case of existence, knowledge is “power”) being culminated dies.

These creations happen to change the original picture. Perhaps Gods mission is to become all knowing, else he might not exist. The darkness (Lack of knowledge) that rules over the land actually has kind of a personality as existence passes across it, albeit a simulated existence. So as knowledge and change spread, so too does the personality of “anti-knowledge” multiply.

The paradigm of our good king, whom we call God.

When we look at it like this, we are so small in comparison to the greater truth. But this was derived from paralleling Gnosticism with what I knew to be mathematics, so with what little knowledge I have this is what I can deduce. Hope that may have provided a few answers (Or hopefully raised a few questions :-$ )

3

Cause & Effect: Determinism & Probability.
1.
Classical physics.
Between cause & effect the determining principle acts.
Is this principle correct?
The classical experiments say: it is correct.
2
Quantum physics.
Between cause & effect only probabilistic or
statistical principle acts.
Is this principle correct?
The quantum experiments say: it is correct.
3.
Why are they, both, correct?
===========.
Socratus.

4

How can one exist without the other? As Aristotle professes (And with which I agree):

Probability is a unique manifestation. We think that, somehow, something might or might not happen, when in full truth we can fully understand from cause and effect that things WILL happen because of Maslows theory (If it can happen, it will happen). Incorporating probability is like saying “Well, sometimes one plus one equals window”. Sometimes it does. BUT, only if you had the choice to think illogically. And that means living in an environment where things are finite (To an extent, the universe will reuse everything from our ashes).

In my opinion, and you can quote me on this, to extend probability into any given finite environment would mean that there is an existence connected to us that separates us from finite things when it is easily enough understood by ALL humans that the effects of all causes are, indefinitely, infinite. It indicates to me that, while no concrete evidence is shown anywhere to prove it (But it could be if anyone bothered to check), that we are definitely not born naturally into this universe.

How many people have mapped the brain wave patterns of logical thought and illogical thought?