… and this drives philosophers crazy because they want to be gods.
… voila…
… par exemple…
This thread cannot be serious. Post this kind of shit in the rant house please.
And actually, God can be explained, to the full extent of what’s explainable to anyone who’s willing to go through a handful of philosophy 101 style thought experiments.
OK go for it Gandhi.
I want a full description in ‘101’ language.
It’s the enexplainable, attempted to be explained and accepted as a matter of faith. There is no room in truth seeking to assert the unverifiable.
Is ‘enexplainable’ 101 language? I’m not sure I understand it.
NO I GET IT, IT’S ‘INEXPLAINABLE’!
So you are saying the inexplainable can be fully explained in 101 terms spelt incorrectly.
OK you are duly knighted ‘Philosophical God.’
Well done.
Nice one. I’d run away from that non-point you were failing at making in the first place if I were you too.
I think you’ve pretty much given an excellent example of exactly what I was talking about.
Idiosyncratically human in so many ways.
Thank you.
No prob.
Anytime.
For what is God not too quick?
…and can we really be so sure there’s even any movement involved? 
Nothing.
I can be sure.
I’m not speaking for anyone else.
if you know that God is too quick for philosophy, then that means that God is not too quick for you to know this fact about God, which means that there is at least one thing which God is not “too quick” for.
But, could God run so fast that he couldn’t catch himself…?
That’s what I want to know.
it seems he could, because he is God and he can apparently do anything; however, he is not quick enough to escape alpha+omega’s rationale/perception of him… for that, no one is quick enough
Conceded.
Hmm… If God is not too quick for nothing, then what is God (not) too quick for? (please excuse my dangling preposition)
It would seem His movement is pointless if it is (not) for nothing. I’m (not) not so sure, myself. 