God: Ten Scientific Commandments.
==.
God has given to Physicists everything necessary to understand
Him and His Genesis by Physical Laws and Formulas.
===.
Scheme of Ten Scientific Commandments: Fundamental Theory 0f Existence.
1 The Infinite Vacuum T=0K
2 The particle: C/D = pi, R/N= k , E = Mc^2 = kc^2 , h = 0 , i^2= -1
3 The spins: h =E/ t or ( h=kb ) and h* = h/2pi
4 The photon, the inertia: c=1, h=1
5 The electron: e^2 = hca, E = hf
6 The gravitation, the star, the time and space
7 The proton
8 The atom
9 The cell
10 The Laws
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy/mass
b) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
c) Pauli Exclusion Principle
===.
The test .
Every theory must be tested logically ( theoretical ) and practically
a) Theory : Dualism of Consciousness: (consciousness / unconsciousness)
b) Practice : Parapsychology. Meditation.
========.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
================…
Morality has nothing in common with natural law other than the fact that they are both deduced through reason.
In line with that, you can exclude the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle. Einstein was right after all.
From young years we know that God is something Absolute.
Nothing concrete in detail.
But what is Physics opinion about Absolute?
Max Planck explained that there are absolute in the Physics:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
b) The negative 4D continuum.
c) The speed of light quanta.
d) The maximum entropy which is possible at temperature
of Absolute zero: T=0K.
On my opinion these Planck absolute parameters
are good basis of understand the God and His Genesis.
Israel Socratus
Unified Field Theory
/ By Tim Joseph /
In the beginning there was Aristotle,
And objects at rest tended to remain at rest,
And objects in motion tended to come to rest,
And soon everything was at rest,
And God saw that it was boring.
Then God created Newton,
And objects at rest tended to remain at rest,
But objects in motion tended to remain in motion,
And energy was conserved and momentum
was conserved and matter was conserved,
And God saw that it was conservative.
Then God created Einstein,
And everything was relative,
And fast things became short,
And straight things became curved,
And the universe was filled with inertial frames,
And God saw that it was relatively general,
but some of it was especially relative.
Then God created Bohr,
And there was the principle,
And the principle was quantum,
And all things were quantified,
But some things were still relative,
And God saw that it was confusing.
Then God was going to create Furgeson,
And Furgeson would have unified,
And he would have fielded a theory,
And all would have been one,
But it was the seventh day,
And God rested,
And objects at rest tend to remain at rest.
randomjoke.com/funny/fieldtheory.php
=================== .
Haha…
Rational Metaphysics has a list of absolute commandments too, a much shorter list… from which all of physics can be derived.
The God spoke in the darkness: “Let there be light !”
. . . . . . . .
And the God said in the darkness:
Let there be light: and there was light.
So, we must examine three conceptions: God, darkness and light.
1
In the darkness it means in the spacetime of dark mass/ energy.
The spacetime of dark mass/ energy it means in the Vacuum.
The Vacuum is the Infinite/ Eternal Homogeneous Space
of the lowest ( the background ) level of Energy: E= 0.
The Vacuum is the Infinite/ Eternal Homogeneous Space
of the lowest ( the background ) level of temperature: T= 0K.
2.
The God is hidden into the Infinite/ Eternal Homogeneous
Energy Space and we don’t know that to say about Him/ Her/ It.
But we know, that according to Quantum Physics a virtual
energetic particles can exist in this Infinite/ Eternal
Homogeneous Energy Space.
So, we can suppose that, maybe, from these virtual energetic
particles the God created light/ quantum of light.
3.
So, in the beginning God created the Light.
How did He do it?
The Bible explain us that the God created the light very easy.
God simply said: ‘Let there be light: and there was light.’
And for many years everybody adopted this convincing proof
without any doubt.
Only poor Einstein had doubts. He wrote sadly :
‘ All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ‘What are light quanta?’
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken. ‘
But Tom, Dick and Harry laughed.
‘What cannot the old Jew understand?’ they said bewilder.
‘ Isn’t clear that quantum of light is a simply wave-particle,
of course, simultaneously ?’
. . . . .
And now one part of mankind ( Religious part ) believes that
God created the light in very easy way.
And the other part of mankind ( Scientific part ) believes that
the light is the quantum of light which simply has his own
wave-particle abilities, of course, simultaneously.
These two great Mystical beliefs govern on the planet Earth
without understand each other. This is situation that we have now.
===============================.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==============.
I seriously hope that isn’t their intended interpretation. 
About creators of God
Everybody creates his God according to his own image and spirit
If triangles made a God they would give him three sides
/ Charles de Montesquieu . Persian Letters, 1721 /
If physicists made a God they would give him
concrete physical parameters
/ Israel Sadovnik Socratus /
=.
I can’t believe God would create a Universe that we could not understand!
/ Nick /
God must be Scientist and must use Physical /
Mathematical Laws and Formulas for His/Her/Its work
of the Universe creation. Therefore if physicists make
God they will give him concrete physical parameters.
There are many things that may exist that science has simply
not discovered and so the existence is denied by science until
science says it exists.
Can God be explained by Physical formulas and laws?
I think ‘ Yes’ , we can understand God’s Nature by Physical
formulas and laws. I think God has given to us everything
that necessary to understand Him and His Genesis using
Physical Laws and Formulas.
One small prayer for many persons.
’ O God, pray do for La Hire to-day what
Thou wouldst La Hire would do for Thee,
if he were God and Thou wert La Hire ! ’
/ Joan of Arc general La Hire, 1390 -1443 /
====.
socratus
Lecture : Scientific heresy
“What sustains pseudoscience is confirmation bias.
We look for and welcome the evidence that fits our pet theory;
we ignore or question the evidence that contradicts it.
We all do this all the time.
It’s not, as we often assume, something that only our opponents indulge in.
I do it, you do it, it takes a superhuman effort not to do it.
That is what keeps myths alive, sustains conspiracy theories
and keeps whole populations in thrall to strange superstitions.”
But you do know that the speed of light has been challenged recently and that the possibility of a state of maximum entropy is also challeneged. These are laws only in controlled experiments. But the scope of the Universe itself is so vast that they can only become law by faith, not by science.
And in both cases they both might be wrong.
I think you are not correct.
Why?
Because the results of physics are evident everywhere.
Because only Physics can logically explain us
the Existence and the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
But . . . . . . as Einstein said:
“ One thing I have learned in a long life:
that all our science, measured against reality,
is primitive and childlike –
and yet it is the most precious thing we have.”
And as Tarun Biswas wrote : ‘In Physics we trust.’
Just this month Daniel Shechtman won the 2011 Nobel Prize
in chemistry for quasi crystals, having spent much of his career
being vilified and exiled as a crank
“I was thrown out of my research group.
They said I brought shame on them with what I was saying.”
" Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts",
/ Richard Feynman. /
bishop-hill.net/blog/2011/11 … eresy.html
=========…
WE have created modes of measures that are consistent with what we find in finite nature, not the infinite. We know that in this minute we occupy in the vast history of time X behaves like this and Y can be predicted using this or that formula. What is consistent infinitely is an idea. Math is an idea that is infinite. We apply it by faith we draw from consistentcy, to the Infinite.
In their heyday, theologians would use reality as evidence for what they believed in. Nietzsche simply thought that if Reality proves anything is either that God does not exist or that we mean nothing much to such Being. This too can be corroborated by physics and it’s Laws as we are not exempt from a single one, including those we find most objectionable.
I wonder, would Einsteing have proposed, as you do, commandments based on science, if indeed it is primitive and childlike?
In Newton’s physics the physical reality is fixed, determined
and measurable. ( Newtonian determinism –
Newton’s mechanical clockwork universe)
In Quantum physics nothing is fixed or fully measurable.
According to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle everything
remains indeterminate.
It means that something remains beyond our grasp.
Bohr and Heisenberg tried to solved the problem of
‘something’ using conception of probability.
And Einstein didn’t agree.
He claimed: ‘God does not play dice with the universe.’
==.
We don’t understand the Quantum physics.
We don’t have detailed explanation of the fundament of Nature.
We don’t have ‘THEORY OF UNITY’ which connects physics,
consciousness and evolution and therefore our science is still
primitive and childlike
===.
To say that at the micro level the universe is uncertain or not fully measurable is correct. To say that everything in nature is undeterminate is to destroy the very premise of science. If indeed nothing was fundamentally measurable then what would be the basis for the application of math to nature?
There is a disparity between quantum measurements and classical measurements, yes, but the men of science are convinced that God does not play dice and that a single theory can unify all phenomena at all levels, quantum as well as classical. But if not, if indeed everything is in play and uncertain, fundamentally, then we don’t even know if the apple will fall or if it all always. How, from this, can you work commandments? Seems your God is too fickle to make up his mind.
Wow, and I was under the impression that those same Phyisicist could not even comprehend the simple sentence. That you did demonstrate, and quite admirably so.
The apple will fall in the gravity system. ( Newtonian determinism )
The apple will not fall in the vacuum system.
Or maybe after vacuum fluctuations / transformation / polarization
the apple will appear in the visual world. ( Quantum indeterminism)