God vs Neitzche vs Dan :)

Neitzche: “God is dead.”
God: “Neitzche is dead.”

Dan: “You’re both dead! ‘Meaningless’ and ‘meaningful’ each don’t suit the ‘universe’ – and things only become ‘meaningful’ once we understand them. For this reason, all unknowable or misunderstood things will be meaningless, and all things fully understood can become meaningful. All things have the capability of being jugded by humans as ‘meaningful’ or ‘meaningless’ can be seen as either way, but in all actuality what we are doing is: to merely try to predict [and then control or deal with] a vast and never-ending process that changes as ‘time’ passes.”

Dan

you seem to know yourself pretty well, why not try actually reading some philosophical literature? It would compliment the clever rhetoric you essentially are repeating in different fashions.

1000th post:

I’m reading Neitzche’s “Beyond Good and Evil” – But I can only read so-much per day, and I like to read facts/science far more then I like to read “philosophy”. I believe that only pure fact can produce pure philosophy.

Excellent :laughing:

Old joke - appeared in graffitti in the 1970s if not earlier

There’s now a third line to the joke
‘Death: Nietzsche is God’

The ‘universe’ doesn’t suit the ‘universe’… (it is so easy being you, isn’t it?)

Prove it

Dan, if you are trying to cut the world on small rational pieces, you are on best way… Dont believe the truth :confused:

damn that’ll take forever.

but Neitzsche isn’t dead yet…not until we understand the things that are meaningful…once we finally understand our place ‘physically’ with the rest of the universe, then Neitzsche will be dead.

I agree with Mr. Kebop… F.N. isnt Dead…!

We can’t feel or claim that something is meaningful when we don’t comprehend it.

I don’t understand all sorts of things but I still have responses to them…

  • “God is dead.”

  • “Neitzche is dead.”

  • “Nietzsche is spelt wrong.” / “Some were born posthumously.”

Hello someoneisatthedoor:

Dan~: and things only become ‘meaningful’ once we understand them.

SIATD: Prove it.

Dan~: We can’t feel or claim that something is meaningful when we don’t comprehend it.

SIATD: I don’t understand all sorts of things but I still have responses to them…

Dan~, a feeling is just a feeling. If a loved one dies, we feel the pain, the hurt, the loss and we still rage against the meaninglessness of our loss. I agree with your first proposition. When we come to understand that death, we are basically saying that we have found a meaning for that death: it is no longer just a meaningless death. And just for the record, I do not mean that learning the results of the autopsy gives us understanding; it does not. We can understand the “how”, but the understanding that can possibly give meaning is the one that answers our “why?”.
I guess I would agree with you if what you mean is that we can’t say that something is meaningful to us when we have no understanding of it.

SIATD, having a response does not convey meaning. Crying at the funeral does not mean that the tears are tears of understanding or that for the person crying, their loss is meaningful.
[/quote]