Gohmert's Equation

Louis Gohmert (R. Texas) stated, “Think about it, no matter how smart they think they are, an atheist has to admit that he believes in the equation: nobody plus nothing equals everything.”
YOUR TAKE?

hello ier…I just don’t like this fight between theist and atheist…it leads nowhere…

I didn’t make up the equation. Gohmert did. And I did not say that I agree with it. If it leads nowhere, so be it. Gohmert is a fundy; and I dislike all fundies, but not all atheists…Fundies tell me I am going to hell for not believing exactly as they do.

my fundies don’t say that…they just think it…but I am thinking that they don’t know enough about science…and I think of words that are not nice…it is not nice for them to say that to you…I don’t think they follow jesus or the golden rule…

The Gohmert quote was taken from today’s news headlines on Yahoo. com.
My take is: something made everything out of itself.

what do you think of the big bang

It got the party started.

I was hoping both atheists and theists here would argue against Gohmert’s logic. I just can’t see how to do it.

We know nothing of ultimate beginnings–like what happened a second before the big bang, like who or what created God.
We live in the mesocosm, the middle place between extremes. Our senses of beginnings and endings are based on our mortality.

I don’t see any reason why an atheist would have to admit that. There are other possibilities that don’t necessitate God. I think Gohmert is relying on his audience’s naivety in believing that something which seems absurd at first glance must be false.

Totally agree. Well said.

It seems that he is merely saying, “Nothing comes from nothing”. The idea is that the universe could not simply spring out of nothingness without a reason. That reason is what is named “God”.

…of course the whole Big Bogus Bag theory is childish nonsense to begin with, but that is another story.

I think both sides of the debate depend on postulating things that they can’t prove.

The irony is that in Buddhist philosophy, God IS nothingness.

So, did everything come from God OR did everything come from nothing?

Yes.

PS: Great to hear you survived Ierr – though it always puzzles me why religious people pray to stay alive and not go to heaven :-k

Ha!!! I was going to say something similar then I read your response. :laughing:

The big bang’s just a theory so there’s no problem there.

The way I see the big bang is similar to the way I see dreams. The dreamer shifts consciousness and ‘Bang!!!’ suddenly, out of ‘nothing’, from one single point which happens to be everywhere simultaneously, a world explodes into existence. The further one travels throughout this dream world, the more it expands and the closer one looks into the smallest particles, the deeper it gets. On both scales, it’s never ending because consciousness itself is creating it as we go.

.

Perhaps cannot be proved logically, rationally. There are other forms of proof.

I like this.
Not ready for prime time heaven or oblivion, whichever is out there.

If you can’t prove that one, you can’t prove anything at all. And no theories are relevant at any time concerning anything.

“If something came from it, it was the cause of something, which isn’t nothing.”

Think about it, no matter how smart they think they are, a theist has to admit that he believes in the equation: somebody plus nothing equals everything.

All an atheist has to believe is: nobody plus everything equals everything.

[size=95]“The danger of philosophy lies in its ‘pernicious’ fruit, the doctrine of the eternity of the world that contradicts the Jewish teaching of God’s creation of the world; the temptation of philosophy lies in its blossoms, which are ‘evidently beautiful ones.’” (Lampert, The Enduring Importance of Leo Strauss, page 46, quoting Strauss’s “The Law of Reason in the Kuzari”.)[/size]