Good And Evil. The Eternal Illusion.

( It should be noted that this is my last rant on the subject of morality as I’m getting quite bored with it to be honest.)

Good and evil are merely myths, superstitions, or fables.

In reality good and evil are a sort of mask hiding the real facets that lie beneath that consists in our social lives where under all our pretensions there simply exists only the relation of those who have power and those who live without it.

The origins of good and evil is quite simple:

Good- Submissive, obedient, passive, tamed, restrained, docile, and pious.

Evil- Intolerant, dis-obedient, aggressive, wild, feral, predatory, and fierce.

The person who is considered good always puts collective or cultural interests above themselves by restraining their own interests to be only secondary in relation to a ideal and collective vision.

The person who is considered evil has no allegiances beyond themselves and often enough dismisses collective interests especially if they interfere with their own ego or preservation.

With the person who is considered evil there exists no secondary interests as there only exists one single interest by itself which is their own.

The conflict of good and evil are merely illusions.

If we had to define what property or principle that both of these behaviors center themselves around we would find the desire of power by relative means.

The illusion or myth of good and evil has always centered around the conflict of those with power versus those without it.

The illusion or myth of good and evil has always centered around the conflict in what way people go at in getting power through that of judgement by a even more equal illusion which is called responsibility.

The illusion or myth of good and evil has always been centered around eternal competition or obstacles regarding the acquisition of power.

Joker you think it would be good to get rid of this distinction? Because the people who use it are evil? Am I reading this right?

I believe such a distinction is absurd and useless much like altruism is in contrast to this discussion.

Well I think you’re just flat wrong. We’ve used that distinction to start wars, to take millions of lives and to get ourselves some resources from those wars in the past. Maybe you’re just mad at it. I don’t really think it makes sense to say it’s useless or absurd. Those are powerful adjectives, when they actually apply. Like if you said, using a foam cooler as a weight for working out would be useless, then that might make sense. Or if you said, that two things could occupy the same place in space and time is absurd, then that might make sense. But using those adjectives simply in a pejorative way to express your emotional state about something is just silly.

You are very confused about morality, as if you took Nietzsche’s explanation of slave morality completely out of the context of his own moral project considering the ubermensch. Alasdair MacIntyre’s “After Virtue” will help you.