How much time should be allowed for one party to pay for its crime against another party?
This is another form of slavery, forcing people to pay for a “crime”. But what is the crime in this topic? What has Maia done? Has she committed a crime?
That’s what you’re missing, Reno. You are justifying “inter generational crime” without even seeing it. So by being born in America, you automatically owe Native Indians??? Is that a fact? What if you’re a Native Indian from Canada, who immigrated into United States, and had children? So a Canadian Native Indian owes for the crime of United States reparations?
Do fresh off the boat FOB Africans deserve reparations for black slavery, even though they were never subjugated to it???
You’re not giving this topic proper respect. Let’s stay on topic, this is about British reparations for “colonialism”. Is this justified? First of all, no, it’s not justified. Second of all, even if it were justified, Maia should not pay a dime. What “crime” did she commit, being born?
No, fuck that. She doesn’t deserve to pay for other people’s crimes. And she shouldn’t be shamed to go picket for “world peace” and “end starvation”, as if she is responsible for saving all the hungry people in the world!!!
See, there’s the double standard, and you admitted to it. You said that she should go picket to end world hunger…assuming that she is responsible for doing so, and not the supposed “victims of colonialism”.
That would make just as much as sense for me to go to Africa, and start guilt tripping and shaming them all, for not feeding poor people in America and Europe.
How dare they? How dare these Africans go around, no picketing for world peace and ending world hunger, when there are starving children in Russia???