Greetings To ILP

I guess that I am having to create this thread all over again because somehow the original one that I made never went passed the moderation que. I just wanted to introduce myself on a couple of key points.

I would describe myself as an authoritarian neither left or right. I am very socially conservative.

Religiously speaking I describe myself as a neopagan.

In order to describe my philosophy I would say that I am very Machiavellian and Hobbesian.

Welcome to ILP. I am the opposite of the ways you describe yourself.

Interesting, in what ways?

I’m a progressive Christian. Be that as it may, welcome aboard.

So, you’re a Liberal Christian then. That comes to no surprise to me.

The end goal of Christianity has always been one of international Communism since its very inception.

This is why Christianity is full of cultural Marxists. It is because of such that I am a big critic of Christianity and all Abrahamic religions.

Thanks for your warm tides of greeting. It is nice meeting you.

Christianity is? Was? Blanket statements!

A blanket statement sees no need for proof,
For it is warm and snugly covers truth.–Ier

Christianity is the historical predecessor of Communism.

Just spare yourself and everyone the trouble and go straight to kt.
You’re welcome.

What’s KT? How am I causing trouble here?

Jesus, just what ILP needs: another fiercely reactionary know-it-all objectivist.

He said in jest. :wink:

Hmm. That sounds like something Satyr might say. :banana-linedance:

You are really nothing more that a racist prick with limited intellectual capacity.

Racist or racism is propaganda established code for anti white. Limited intellectual capacity? You dare make these sort of statements without even knowing who I am. Pretty outrageous.

Excuse me…what?

As opposed to having an unlimited intellectual capacity like Lev. The imbecile is so emasculated and cowardly he is afraid to even say that you are stupid. Stupid, you know that word, Lev? Stupid, dumb, dense, dull, asinine, unintelligent.

His language is as castrated as he is.

It’s an inside joke. But trust me: I’m the only one that get’s it. :wink:

I’d suggest that we give Red a decent hearing, not an unwelcome of ad homs. His ideas should be discussed, not his personality.
Red, I have friends who claim to be wiccans and druids. They tolerate me because I do not condemn their beliefs. Any search for god or gods is valuable. Do not condemn mine.
The early Christians were into communalism. It’s sad if this approach to society became Stalin’s communism. But that does not nullify the original intent.

While I don’t like Christianity or any Abrahamic religion for that matter I tolerate Christians.

Still, I see no hope for western civilization with its embracing of Christianity. For me historically it would of been best if Europe and European culture remained pagan. With this I believe Christianity needs to be expelled from Europe and European culture all over the world.

Christians can find sanctuary like their Jewish cousins in Jerusalem within Israel.

Its almost two thousand year reign over Europe and European culture all over the world has run its course.

Willkommen, Herr Skull!

Meaning you favor aristocratic, generally patriarchal hierarchy?

This makes me wonder if you are a theoretical pagan or a practicing one. Theoretical ones usually are full of shit, do not know how to be humble before great forces; they think that being humbled and being humiliated is the same. In many religions this is or may in fact be the case but not so with paganism, by which, I assume, you mean the northern European paganism which at least roughly correlates to the Greek forms but not at all to the desert religions.

That would mean to me a practical form of monarchy, facilitating both civil stability and aristocratic privilege.

Western Christianity tends to be nominal Christianity, not reliance on the sources of beliefs. The same might be said for neopaganist wannabees who have no ancestral touch with their beliefs. My Am. native friend told me that the wannabees for his spiritual insights are there because the churches have lost their power to incite emotions common to spirituality.