There’s one reason for a “straight” man to think being “gay” is absolutely disgusting and vile, and to hate people that are gay… Because he himself is gay, and has to over compensate for this by attempting to extirpate any gay thoughts and desires within him.
Oh, and that brainwashed religion thing.
How does it mean that a person is gay if they hate gayness? If I hate nazis does that make me one?
I didnt try to justify my beliefs upon someone else. One thing i learn on this site is that Those most passionate about not being critisiced for there beleifs are the most critical when it comes to others. THe bible that is the oldest living book, story, document known. IT says HOMOSEXUALITY IS not only wrong…BUT A SIN! Call it Brainwashed, if you want. Ill call it what i want. MY religion Does not approve and the fact its existed for over 1000 years im thinking its a good idea.
Because its the only awnser they can comeup for putting shit up there ass, they want you to be like them so it makes them feel better or more acceptible. the more they feel there are like YOU there more they are ok with the fact they know HOMOSEXUALITY is wrong.
I do call it brainwashing, i.e. to timid to think for yourself and come to own conclusions.
As for holding esteem for your book simply in virtue of its age, I find that incredibly silly, especially when such age more realistically suggests:
So I just you’re gay then, because you hate gay people.
And how are gays supposed to differ from us? I can’t see any difference.
A gay man qua gay poses no threat to a straight man, and harms him in no way. Man qua gay is identical to man qua straight, the only difference is sexual desire. The question that needs to be asked, is why would you hate someone specifically for the way he is sexually aroused. The answer is, it is a defense mechanism, look at the reasoning behind disliking being gay in this thread, “they want me to be like them”…Such nonsense, why in the hell would one perceive that a gay man wants you to be gay, and even so, why would this bother you if you’re straight. The Answer is that a struggle is waging within said person, and in order for one side to win out, the other side has to be extirpated. Hence, one hates gays, because if one doesn’t then one risks becoming gay.
The fabrication of a threat to one’s world view is the result of an insecurity in that same world view.
Straight men hate gay men for reasons other than them themselves being gay and brainwashed into that behaviour, they are 2 completely different and conflicting types of people personality wise.
I personally don’t give a flying fuck if you simply like to bone men and find them sexually attractive, but theres few things i hate more than that way they and a few bi/femenim straight men are in their mannerisms and how they act all round, some call it feministic but it bares only a little resemblance to how women act, its far werse.
The more masculine you are the more youre against it.
Basic point is, the more masculine you are the more you’re against the way they are.
The question becomes, why do you feel the need to dichotomize their personality from your own, or more specifically, why do you hate their mannerisms and how they act all around. Masculinity and femininity are social constructs, why would you need to concrete them into your worldview.
I have no consciencely rationalised reason to hate them,
the way they act grates against my being (that may not even make sense but thats descibing how it feels), my hate is caused by them acting how they do, it’s as simple as that.
I find it’s case for all the hypermale and masculine males, the masculinity of men is definatley seems to have been decreasing though, which does inturn mean, the mannerism of and stylings of many in the general male populance has started to grate on me a little, this mass metrosexualism, i dont mind a man that shaves all their hair and all that, is the ‘faggotness’ that comes with it.
It’s just that, i even like what gays have done for music culture.
Either all hypermales and masculine men (including me) are ‘naturally’ against gay mannerisms or just i am.
It’s not femenim but it is anti masculine, and we dont like it because it conflicts our being, the way we are and our mannerisms.
Do you dislike paedophiles, Nihilistic ?
If you do, then you know what that means.
A–>B does not mean B–>A
Haha! Homosexuality is not acceptable but poor spelling is I notice! Hypocrisy! Spell that, BIATCH!
So, you’re going to beat up your friend if he kisses a guy? Why not set pansy flowers on fire too? They are so threatening - with the large pink heads - so terrifying!
Human Experience is MOLTO GRANDE: it won’t fit easily into any philosophy you are I care to believe. Homosexuality is quite trivial incomparison to other human experiences: war, rape murder, violent assault, standing on a land mine, being gorged by an Alegator, being bitten by a monkey with rabies, being blinded by mace spray, having piles, or AIDS, or Downs Syndrome, or Autism, or Obessive Complusive Disoder.
Life is quite odd: especially if you live in an Indigenous Tribe in the Amazonian Jungle, especially if you have six fingers, particualrly if you can do mathmematics without a calculator, especially if you know how to cook the perfect braze steak with out drying it through, especially if you give birth to children, particularly if you invent a steam engine.
Life is fille with wonderment! Life is filledwith all kinds of terrible things! Life is filled with all sorts of beauty and goodwill! Life is full of peril and contradition and indecision.
So, when you go to kick your friend in the ass, for kissing another boy, remember how truly inconsequential a kick it will be, and how bad you are at spelling.
Noone is perfect: particularly if you only have one leg - but not exclusively.
If ’ A = B ’ then obviously ’ B = A ’ . . . If it doesn’t then ’ A = B ’ must be false ( which it is ). 
All cats are felines.
All felines are cats.
Nihilistic wasn’t implying sexual insecurity = hating gays, he was saying that one’s sexual insecurity leads one to hate gays. There is no " = " there.
A leads to B, not A = B.
I can’t believe you actually winked after your (second) display of misunderstanding, haha.
Tristan… is that a joke? Again, I wasn’t using any “equals”, but you are aware tof the flaw in what you wrote… right?
I hope you realize that masculinity is defined and ingrained within you by your society. Your dichotomy is false, and the need for the dichotomy to be so strict points directly to an insecurity.
Oh really ? . . . Then try this earlier quote :
Like most people, I’m not particularly fond of paedophiles. So, going by Nihilistic’s gay-propaganda-logic, I am most likely a closet paedophile.
[size=117]Ridiculous.[/size]
Wow… you sure are stubborn. You still don’t get it?
His logic says A leads to B. There are several variables between A and B that bring A (closet homosexual) to B (hatred towards gays).
A does not equal B!
A closet homosexual does not = Hatred towards gays.
I do, however, see from this other quote you included that Nihilistic does claim that B is dependent on A, so what I wrote about A → B does not suggest B → doesn’t really apply to this scenario as, according to Nihilistic’s argument, B can only come about from A.
However, there are variables that bring A → B that have to do with homosexuality.
To apply his logic in this case to pedophilia doesn’t make any sense.
I don’t agree with Nihilistic’s claim, but your response doesn’t refute it in any way.
It is not as simple as A = B, B = A here.
Ok, I accept that answer. I was just curious. I was raised in the church, so I’ve always been told it is wrong, but I just don’t believe it to be wrong. It confuses me to even think about it as wrong, but whatever.
And I’ve really tried to understand people that think it is wrong, I really have, I just can’t seem to grasp that concept.