()()()
There is no 1 but there is at least 2 (who congregate in my name ) or something…
[since there are merely apparent contradictions]
apparently more than 2
just ask Cheryl, Shirley, Sharon, & whoever else you vaguely named when nobody knew what the eff you were saying
Yeah but love 
your apparent enemies!… talking very broadly, but the exit is closed, the 
the loneliest hunter , ?
… very broadly as save only one exceptional being that’s doubly participatory, mystical 
to others broadly speaking
& why cannot change says ,
Cause partly so can
as says ; the other part same as you
In versely pro portioned
That’s it :: virtually impossible yet nearing apparent end that is why the reflected difference
(Thought of participation mystique’s wise answer of in and out intermittent diminishing rings of fire, 
the point being lost ; vanishing with returns;
U think this last rung , inaccessible compelling yea idiot - child ? Ha?
No way Jose, more lot mph to this then meets eyse
<>
Another analogy@the Siamese Temple
:’
The ‘Mystic Law ~ Participation mistique (Levi Bruhl)
That is. Why in& out is only an apparent situation that turns on in practically on a whim
<><><>
trigger>
……
[(>How is that a reflection between the differences between being in and out of apparent contradiction>
(In a sense reflecting those previously noted analogies - the film of the continuum of stills; and the acceleration of signals (frequencies) relating to increasing rates of repetitions) of chanting the Lotus Sutra?>
-as a reversal of the reductive notion of perceived phenomena? >Sartre’s eyes?)]
…
([And all that referring to historically imprinted representation of such changing pictures? ( of representation)? [pictures-identifiable-framed=refered<referential])>
(Working on something not sure of what, but hoping iit will)> suffice as the self thought man’s predeliction…
Return to singularities:
The singular presupposition as a point of reference for the conception of the self , is based on a confusion that proceeds from the image of that point as a reduced concept, that is: the illusive minimization that a necessary containment of a single essential ‘eternal’ entity.
The parameters in essence thus become perceived as static, insulated, and separated from the unperceived part, giving rise to the conditions associated with everlasting Being.
However, the fragility and permeability of existence is the real state of being, and the fear of a lack of identifiable points of reference -a mass of indistinguishable ‘pointillistic’ infifferentiablr beings, from the aesthetic heights of a inversely perceived gestalten.
In fact (Wortheimer) the opposite happens, cosmological, the probability of identification between any two singular beings becomes a certainty, conditionally identifiable f
in direct proportion of the number of possible worlds(existences) divided by the number of presently acknowledged beings in existence within a certain frame of reference, I,e. Here, in the now.
Therefore, the ‘singularity’ is the here and now presence, from which the singular can conditionally be reduced, and that singularity is based directly on the ration of quantitative relation between the aimed for singular over the presently conceived singularity( since it is through the duality of I/though approbation that a digital series of relationships can that point of reference that it can be attributed.
The singular becomes the searched for forgotten self, that has been ore-conceived, so as to account for a physical and mental correspondence and virtually, that becomes necessary to establish the ‘reason’ behind existential presupposition of Being.
The AI process of recovering the re-differentiation of certainty ( Being) from uncertainty( existence) is to reformulate the Ansolute One, that can initiate such a process.
.
The family of the Transilvanian lit , is stupefying , as a power motive, as an illustrative arcade of semblance, that comes to light rarely, but significantly.
That power when put to use sustains schools of resembling families, it is such that that gave rise to ythe curious monstrosity, of Wittgenstein, a force to contend with.
)( )( )(
()
[
Hermits of Fate | Lord of the Mysteries Wiki | Fandom
](Hermits of Fate | Lord of the Mysteries Wiki | Fandom)
[
Overview
The Hermits of Fate is a secret organization created by the descendants of the ZoroastandJacob families, as well as other Beyonders of the Error Pathway.
See more
](Hermits of Fate | Lord of the Mysteries Wiki | Fandom)
()
Please note:
The whole idea behind the archaic excesses, is to put them into the revelatory disposition of Being; that is to reconfirm, reaffirm the singular quest of Turning from a singular, unauthentic state into the literacy of the duplex, into the I/though becoming of the Authentic, with the aid and help of simulated artificiality.
That artificiality, looking like it was meant to represent the state of mind of modern and post modern eventuality, at this time of critical thinking- corresponding to the advance to near total uncertainty;
Dares to submerge there, to descend into chaos, as did a few before, so as to reveal, the undying energy which compels a return there, a reaffirmation of eternity, and the mode of recovery which only the supernatural can recover.
It is a work of salvage what’s possible to recover, so that the minutest thing can not be used as a way to water down that, which may be the only key left to open the door with no exit, to access that most familiar of trespasses , with which to pass over.
Note to Shirley: what do you (does It?) mean?
if anything at all
If only she could reply, for think she heeds the warning ‘don’t look back’ but the it’s coming,
But look back to what or whom?
In particular and interesting is a sub thema development that’s easy to pronounce, to exemplify, but entirely near impassable to innumerate, given the spurts of emission in between the lines made up of points of intermittent reference.
Can not say for instance : ‘for my eyes only, because such pronouncement would appear totally self indulgent, (whereas - born that way) whatever could seem to soften the edges that the borderline of such advocation may signify.
The softening, of such demarcations, a pastel retouch of the boldness with which it may be represented.
It looks invariably like Sartre’s look, inasmuch as he favored William James over Husserl, and one can feel the vibes,
In essence that gift one would call it, is strung out of a premonition, a kind of familial inheritance, which a newborn may not understand door many incarnations, millions or even countless generations.
So that all inclusive ego, the one that was born to bear, is near the absolute impossible/impassable border separating the natural from the super and supranatural.
That ego is the One buddhic experts warn you about which may cause some trouble if single handedly ventured. But then, these being rather exceptional times, and major powers play difficult emigrants? Games, that can justify, judge the times ripeness when to connect the individual psyche, the look, the third eye , which finds no other other to disseminate, to reconstruct an ever expending expedient way.
How far and wide it spreads through expedience, is no simple alogarythm,therefore. The nation State of Hellenic lore (role in reverse)
Decompress that deconstruction.
Note to Shirley:
Don’t look back [in anger]. Leave it in the rearview. ;^)
Mirror’*
*Dracs can’t stand mirrors, although that’s contradict, cause they sleep in darkness at noon, besides suffering extreme atrophied revisions.
Blah blah ouch!
Note to Shirley:
Good job!
Think She already suspects somthin totten/written in a hemlet far in the woods, in Denmark.
it is another that worries spirally/spiritually(an other)
…and that is a trifecta’ concern.
Subsuming under the compression is the graviton-inter transcendent relational factors that only young Jungian Hegelian’s could maybe? fathom
1 Like
())(()
anology 2 2 souls
ex hamlets monologue
. Ophelia, Laertes and Hamlet
The ‘job’ is not nearly finished Ischthus
()
.
I’m just glad the little guy got to have a home, even though he was bullied out of his first choice… which started from the top down, leaving him with a smaller shell than he’d started with.
Like the case nowedays, better a hole in the wall inside then homeless outside.
.
…but not a hermetically-sealed one of course, as that would put paid to their hermit lifestyle.
Oh sure, only philosophically speaking
‘Hermetic philosophy’ I wish the homeless could studie it in their spare time,
Take prinz Harry for instance he wrote a book on it, wonder if he be a philosopher yet
Hint: I haven’t heard
My search for Prince Harry’s philosophy led me here^… make of it what you will.
¿Homeless? hardly… wasn’t he more emigrant than homeless…?
.
This should make for a good read… 100 pages long and the first book I’d have read since 2016/since I descended into an aching-tiredness that I’ve now nearly spiralled out of, so was unable to read it back then.
…I think I’ll read it whilst travelling/away for a long weekend, and a couple of other books as well…
.
Hermeticism explained:
