Honesty & Openness

[greenfuse]

A moment of lovely irony:

@3PEudiamonia

@anew1

But why is ‘your theory’ not working?

There’s a difference between not working and being accepted.

anew: Agreed.

one usually accepts something first, before they set out to see if it works or not.

anew: How many people have accepted your theory of three principles of happiness here?

@3PEudiamonia

The Three Principles of Happiness currently face institutional delay rather than logical flaws—

anew: Although the logical flaws were just pointed out, to you.

@3PEudiamonia

similar to the historical reception of heliocentrism, relativity, continental drift, and Galois theory. This delay stems from the structural exclusion within academic evaluation systems toward “non-orthodox methodologies,” known as “instrumental origin bias”: judging theories based on their source or authorship rather than the quality of their arguments.

anew: So, you believe that your theory here is not being accepted because of other people, and not because of any flaws within your theory, right?

@3PEudiamonia

To address this institutional delay, I propose two institutional designs grounded in the Three Principles of Happiness: a reform proposal for doctoral education and a new paradigm for the academic ecosystem.

anew: you can propose things until the day you “die”. But, if people inform you of why your theory/s are not being accepted, then do not take this on. Instead, blame others, or worse still blame ‘institutions’ for not listening to you.

Can one recognize oneself in the mirror?

Original post here: The paradox of pacifism - #36 by anew1