In fact one can see eodnhoj7 tracking this same pattern here
With your identity, with your soul, you have been loving particular ideology, philosophers, and ways of thought.
Jeremy Benthem was a weirdo. He rejected God in a Christian society. He did many sins and abominations. John Stewart Mills, he was equally a weirdo. Then we have John Rawls. Are these the men who are your prophets? Are these the men you are your teachers?
Do I need to embarrass and show you more?
@greenfuse You are a very educated fool.
No.
See how “greenfuse”, once again, asks a question that appears to be asked for clarification, but actually provides the answer to its own question. Meaning, “greenfuse” believed it knew what the answer was before the question could even be answered and clarified. And, as can be very clearly seen here “greenfuse’s” believed answer is absolutely totally Wrong, AGAIN.
Once more, “greenfuse” has completely and utterly missed and misunderstood the point I was making.
See how, AGAIN, it never waited for ‘my answer and clarification’, believed, absolutely, that it already knew what ‘the answer’ would be, and then proceeded on under its own believed reality.
Which was False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect from the very outset. And, by the way, this is a very common occurrence with “greenfuse”.
Moot.
Once more, these have absolutely nothing at all to do with what I have been saying and writing here.
But I have not chosen to believe that, and you know full well that I had not and would not.
Once again, “greenfuse” has demonstrated and proved that it is not capable to understand some things from any perspective other than from its own little, limited, and closed perspective only.
Anew seems to be unfamiliar with people using paraphrases to see if their undertanding is correct. He did not ask, but assumed a lot upon seeing such a statement. Anew seems to work from the assumption that when other people do something, they are doing it for the reasons anew would have for doing it. There seems to be a lack of interest in, and understanding of, other perspectives than his own.
Once more anew opts to not explain what he meant very strange quote somehow connecting disconnection from empathy and not answer his clarifying questions. Anew has stated again, elsewhere that he is interested in improving his communication. One thing he could do is explain what he means, instead of using people’s questions as jumping off points to judge them. A person who is interested in communication notices the interest and moves the conversation forward.
Unfortunately, despite is claim to be interested in improving his communication, anew tends to respond defensively when people notice the ways he does not communicate as well as he might have. See recent discussions between him and other posters for examples of this.
One of the reasons WHY these people, in the days when this was being written, were sort of disconnected from empathy is because of exactly what “greenfuse” refuses to do, which can be clearly seen in its responses to me. When ‘I’ ask “greenfuse” for clarification, on just about every occasion “greenfuse” will just not provide any.
Apart from the grammatical problems here…
exactly what “greenfuse” refuses to do
the larger quote above makes little sense, so I can understand his reluctance to communicate about that quote.
Projection as usual.
Zero change. One wonders if he can see the reflection in Manonfire.
And of course anew avoided answering the question of whether my not responding to his clarifying questions, anymore, might be due to something else than what he assumes. To him his assumptions are true until others somehow disprove his ‘mindreading’, despite his understanding that other peoples’ assumptions need justification.
Back on ignore.
Is an an epic liar, and person of low character who likes to lie like Hillary Clinton.
@anew1 and I, we have our issues. I believe we can both agree that Greenfuse is out of line.
What do you presume I assumed, which you claim was a lot, exactly?
LOL ‘This one’ is now just ‘trying to’ repeat what I pointed out about them.
Now, you have made another claim here, so let us see if you can back it up and support it at all. What are you talking about and referring to here, exactly?
If this is what appears to you, and your perception that you would like to make public here, then okay.
I wonder ‘which perspectives’ “greenfuse” is referring to here, exactly
Talk about a very strange quote, or sentence.
It is this kind of response WHY I NEED help with communication.
I have mentioned numerous times that I WAIT, patiently, for those who show enough interest and curiosity before I explain exactly what I mean. But, even when I explain this, I am NOT heard and understood. So, again, I need to learn how to communicate better, with these human beings.
Where, when, and how do you imagine I have judged people here, exactly?
Will you provide any examples?
Here is another prime example of how ‘these people’ believe that their own interpretation could not be Wrong nor faulty.
‘This one’ usually does not have an absolute clue as to in what way I want to communicate better, however “greenfuse” literally believes that its own interpretation could not be a misinterpretation at all. As can be seen very clearly by the way it writes here.
But I do not have any reluctance at all to communicate about that quote. So, what ‘this one’ again has assumed to be true is absolutely False and Wrong.
What do you think or believe I have my own little, limited, and closed perspective in regards to, exactly?
What did you expect to change here “greenfuse”?
What question was that exactly?
I wonder if “greenfuse” noticed or worked out that ‘the way’ it proposes some of its questions, they are able to be answered and clarified. This is due to the number of Falsehoods within them.
Also, what is ‘it’ that you assume I am assuming, exactly? you like to claim, but can you clarify?
you can believe that what you presume are my assumptions, but until you are Open and Honest here, like this thread title, and start listing what you believe or assume are ‘my assumptions’ you are only doing what you usually do and alluding to something only. Also, some of what you call ‘my assumptions’ I KNOW are absolutely True. Again, I already have the proof for these facts.
Again, ALL claims made here need justification. Otherwise, people can take their claims into any other forums where justification is not needed, like in philosophy forums.
you keep claiming this, but WHEN will you actually fulfil this lovely promise, exactly?
“greenfuse” has just the exact type of upbringing that has caused it to have the very superiority complex and ego. So, ‘I’ feel very sorry for what “greenfuse” had to endure and has ended up like.
In this thread I tend to check in on responses because I started the thread. I’ve had you on ignore for quite a while, which affects my responding or seeing your posts in the rest of the forum. I’m sort of stunned you didn’t notice the lack of interaction. Ah well. But, I checked in in that other thread. You do understand that one can ignore, then lift that function, then put someone ‘back on ignore.’ If you didn’t understand that, hopefully now you do.
This is hilarious. Manonfire says you guys have issues. This is how he describe his connection to someone he ‘has issues with’
Manonfire referring to anew: You know, and you are apart of them. No wonder you are so worthless.
Two posters who cannot admit they are wrong about anything significant, who initiate ad homs, insults and mindreading and who are noise in the signal to noise ratio here.
And anew, of course I believe that you ‘feel sorry’ for me. How could I not given how honest you are about your emotions in general?
LOL, LOL, LOL,
“I’ve had you on ignore for quite a while”, literally means that you are;
- Talking to me.
- Been reading my words and listening to me.
Which both mean that you are NOT ignoring me.
Yet you somehow manage to find my posts and respond to them here.
Who said I did not notice? Why did you presume or believe what you have here?
What can be very clearly seen here is how this one ‘tries to’ manipulate the readers here.
See, I ask, when will you actually fulfil the lovely promise of putting me not just on ignore, but putting me “back on ignore”, (like ‘I’ am some sort of naughty child who needs to be punished), but what you keep completely and utterly missing is if you read my posts, alone, let alone read them and respond to them - is NOT ignoring me at all.
It does not matter if you read and/or reply to one or not all of the posts of mine ‘you’ are still not ‘ignoring me’.
LOL you even started this whole post to be ‘about me’ and ‘my words and posts’ even after you claimed that ‘I’ was “back on ignore”, on one of the many times you have used and written those words.
you can put ‘me’ on and off ignore as many times as you like, but you did not seem to notice and recognise that even after you, once again, wrote the words, “back on ignore”, even after my very ‘next post’, you STILL managed to NOT ‘ignore me’ and even went to the effort of ‘replying to me’.
It is like you cannot even ignore reading my words, as well as being able to ignore replying and talking ‘to me’.
Once more, ‘this one’ is ‘trying’ its hardest to fool and deceive the readers here. Fortunately, they are NOT that stupid.
Anyone here could know that you can click on the ignore button and turn it off as many times one likes, but your constant reading of ‘my words’ and then going out of your way to respond to them means and shows that you are not really doing what you say and claim here. Unless, of course, you are turning on ignore, and then turning off on my very next post.
Again, the accusation and claim, without the supporting proof is really not saying anything at all.
I have NO idea;
- What this question is asking for.
- How can one talk to another who is claimed to be “back on ignore”. Of course, on, only if “back on ignore” means for a few mins or so.
Harvard started as a Christian Institution. There was an Equality in Christ. An equality in a shared values system. Given someone cheated, they get kicked out. No one cares about them. A college student who didn’t graduate college, he was a failure.
You have shown yourself to be a weirdo, someone not to be taken seriously. You are kicked out. That is not Ad Hominem. No one needs you. Everyone and everything will do just fine without you and your opinions.
You have no authority. Zero. And then if this was meant as an assertion, it is false.
So, “manonfire63” believes that some place claimed to be a “christian institution”, with a shared values system, calls people “a failure”, and then “kicks” them out.
I wonder if “manonfire63” ever considered there to be any contradiction or hypocrisy here at all.
double post, double post