I couldn’t believe this statistic when I saw it… for every woman molested during the mass new years Eve attacks in Germany, roughly two were involved. This means… they couldn’t find enough women worth cornering and molesting in the first place.
I was expecting it to be very different, like one Syrian four every four Germans touched… just running loose grabbing all the candies on display. It wasn’t the case, the poor rapist had to ration the booty and share.
I see in Germany, the birth rate was only 1.47 percent, well below the ability to maintain population.
It becomes rather obvious the reason why. German women don’t want to be sexy anymore. They are so unsexy, that even perverted molested ignore them. So few, mist women worth being targeted had to take on at least two men.
If you aren’t being sexy, your not gonna get dick, and no dick = no babies.
German woman need to dress sexier. No more feminism, just wear short skirts and tight shirts, and stop state subsidation of birth control. Women clearly have forgotten how to be women. If a baby isn’t looking out of your puss every five years, your doing your womanhood wrong.
No more listening to Sting singing Roxanne. You need to go strut your goods more often. It brings a lot of unwanted attention, but you can’t get the attention you NEED without it. German women need to be more cock friendly.
Great news, after looking over the forum history, I have nailed the exact point this forum started going downhill, and Mods started to ignore boys who cry wolf, and present my proof.
It was when Matty started posting in history threads:
I went looking back at Matty’s posts, couldn’t find anything of value philosophically that warranted his position of being intellectually superior, if anything, quite the other case. Then I found a Philip K. Dick inspired thread, obviously modelled off The Man In The White Castle… if you have Amazon Prime I highly recommend watching Season 1 for free.
Matty didn’t know what the fuck was going on in the whole thread. He tried to project the idea he had competency in history (doesn’t, I’ve exceptionally well versed in history, he has never said anything besides mention a few titles to suggest he has even a passing knowledge of the field. Never paused a moment over his threads saying “damn, this guy is on to something”.) not once, but repeatedly. He more or less behaved like a fish out of water on a subject any historian could of easily navigated.
The author of the thread was a elderly White African, had held typically White Boer mildly to moderate racist outlook on race, wasn’t a mainstream outlook for any white supremicist as many in the thread initially thought… he essentially assumed societies were similar (I can only go by his post in that thread) to one another, went through stages of cognitive development both on the individual and cultural level, more or less lifted the idea from Freud and Erik Erikson’s stages of development for children growing up… he thought there was no difference from a Anthropological perspective from a Nebraska farmers dance vs a African tribal dance. He is more or less mainstream in his presumption here… though linking it to civilized stages of development, stratified from Stone to Steel, is a bit too much for me. I’ve seen similar ideas tried before though. The most offensive aspect about his post was his isolated Boer outlook on race, which sounds offensive to modern western ears. One fails to realize though he wasn’t asserting racial superiority, but was looking as cosmopolitan as he could from his extensive travels through sub-saharan Africa. He is representative of the intellectual class in the generation of the Boer who pushed to embrace desegregation the best they could. It is lost on western ears that the progressives liberals, such as he is, sounded like this in this era. They were stuck in two worlds, juggling two very different ideologues.
WW2 was pretty distant for Africa. He was well exposed to the disaster most countries experienced post-colonialism. Many countries had a sudden population boom and drive for consumption, working wage jobs in imperial economies. Tribal reliance was torn up, lines of nation states slapped up randomly across Africa. It wasn’t the case of the poor and exploited either remaining just as poor or getting better in Africa after the colonial era ended, it got worst… civil wars, and proxy cold wars broke out all over. South Africans as mercenaries were in especially high demand. A new faction, the UN entered the fray, randomly (and I do mean randomly, look at Ireland at Jadotsville) fighting then not fighting in conflicts when it suited them. Africa wasn’t used to this level if mechanical warfare. A lot of benuffuts came with working the rare wage job, but also high inequality… in response guerilla movements and highwaymen… this continues to this day, I’ve been internet tracking a group moving out of the mountains in Uganda into the Congo… they are robbing and killing… I’m presuming it will turn into a fully fledged guerilla group within a few years… there hasn’t been a insurgency or separatist group operating there for a few decades… why I’m monitoring them so closely.
The author was correct in many of his propositional statements… US/Soviet Alliance lead to a nasty cold war, and this played out far worst for the third world than I think genocidal Nazis ever could of effected. A historian would know this, for these reasons:
Nazis focused on using local police forces in already developed areas, developed in regards to having infrastructure… roads, trainyards, depots, to collect the population piecemeal for deportation and killing. They had to make use of concentration camps… why? I don’t know why, wasn’t that efficient. Think it was just George Bernard Shaw’s influence. Germans are only efficient in making machines, not in making systems… it is literally the reason why they never succeeded in actually conquering the world… complex systems of government confound them, it is why the EU is going to hell as well… but they make great tools.
Third world barely has these things in this era. You show up to Africa or India, your not going to be able to use the same techniques used in Europe to kill all the black people. Look how hard it was for the US in Vietnam trying to find people, dropping agent orange… now imagine the green expanse of Africa. Not happening, unless in cities… but if you kill the people off in the cities, your not going to have operating supply depots, miners, cotton workers, etc… filling those depots, working in nasty textile mills, loading ships up for the Suez canal. Think the Nazis would of done to the British, French, Spanish and Portugese colonials, what the British did to the Boer… put them in managerial positions to handle the blacks, and ignored the blacks.
Problem instantly arises… if the US was knocked out if Europe/North Africa, with the Nazis merely pushing the US out of gaining or keeping a foothold… would this of effected the Japanese front at all?
No. We would of thrown everything against Japan, Soviets would exist in eastern Russia north of China, supplied with arms sent via Alaska. Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, Philippines would of rapidly fell into our political orbit. Japan would of been yanked out of China, and China going Red-White wouldn’t of mattered much.
Question arises, what happens to Africa then? Likely a Nazi-US proxy War, just as the US, Chinese, and Soviets fought and funded one… some countries in South America were very open to fascism, we likely would of seen a flair up of militarization there as well. Nazi would of had zero access to Panama canal, US zero access to Suez, because we would of been wartime enemies, and the US would of been seriously butthurt over loses.
Demographically, US in long run better off. We had two major war fronts, only Europe would lose… this would of been staggering high, but given mist of our women stayed out if the war, they could of reproduced fast, one generation and we be back in the game. Germans either case suffered bad during the wars, and I suspect in either reality, US would of developed nukes first. Roosevelt seemed rather keen on nuking Germany.
Dropping nukes can force a armistice, but I wouldn’t call that winning. Just would if meant cease of hostilities.
Either way, for the third world, proxy wars. South America more warlike, Africa less, but still in conflict. China-US would be as close in either scenario. India is the wild card… technically if the British Empire lost the war just right… say during a failed D-Day invasion… high casualties but not catastrophic, held England till the US dropped some nukes, then the British Empire wouldn’t go into bankruptcy. Could it hold India? I seriously doubt it, depends on how much of its army it list in Normandy. If Rommel cut the supply to Egypt off early, without Japan reaching it… then independent India. If Rommel didn’t, or the British Empire just focused on Panama and South African efficiency, trying to build of a white colonial reserve within a few generations, then perhaps not. North India would if been a excellent location for this, Swat Valley perfect, South Africa perfect. I just doubt Ghandi would of played along.
In regards to fuel security… Germans never had fuel security in their expansion. Had they made it to the Cacauses and Arabia, yeah… would they of been environmentally friendly? No more than the world is now. If you can disregard whole races, you can disregard the environment they live in.
Central Asia would of been the Nazi Empire’s deathbed. Even if the US dropped nukes, we wouldn’t of carpet bombed them. A lot of German infrastructure (and occupied infrastructure in occupied lands) would of survived. How far east past the Urals could the Nazis push with a limited population? China, Iran, Turkey… yes Turkey, would of done the exact same thing. At the end if the Ottoman empire, they sent a hugh mechanized force across Central Asia trying to rebuild the Ottoman Empire in ancestral turkudh steppe lands. Was militarily successful, though a useless colonial flop.
Once you can get a mechanized army into central Asia, and can supply it, very little gets in the way of being able to project power most any direction. I have little doubt Turkey would continue to exist, as the Nazis, like America, were friendly to them… Asia Minor is a good buffer state, just likely would of lost Istanbul, perhaps a few classical Greek cities… but would of expanded hard east. Same for Iran… less competition to the North East away from Turkey.
Those are the major obvious blocs I can see rising up.
Alternative history is actively debated on every history forum I participate in. I am not too fond of it, cause it usually becomes absurd, but the principles of statecraft are still applicable. There is no valid reason to be a superficial expert, in causing troubles for a thread (this is what you do best Matty, your a classic troll) just because your cranky.
Neither in this thread, nor in that thread, did you engage the conversation productively. You merely stated how superior you are, demanded mods do something, and then when the facts cone our, declare the limits of your competency and refuse to participate.
I believe, in general, discussions on not just history or philosophy are out of your scope of competency but also your ability to hold conversations with real people in general are well outside your scope of competency. Your likely better off not talking to anyone. He projected simpke hypothetical questions, and you completely shot down the legitimacy of the argument in the very beginning, oblivious to what was going on. Your inept at holding discussions in history, cant find a singke good duscussion you had in philosophy so far in your search records.
Really Matty, are you what passes as a philosopher these days?
This thread, how I started it, was a fishing thread… it was aimed to drag in both Feminists and Racists (K showed uo, she us monitoring it) into the discussion on a midern topic, and I woukd of used it as a springboard for a deeper discussion on the issue. I am experienced enough in debating that I don’t gave to use orthodox setups, I just need to play the role of a protagonist, and remain adaptive from then on out. Works very well.
However, you are one if those special kinds of retards who attacks first and not ask questions later. I typically just toy with the likes of you… save for the extreme autist fringe… just isnt right. Your so retarded… I can’t honestly tell if your authentically autistic or just stupid. It is why I had to go double check… last time you clashed with me, I treated you like a retard, dumbing my replies down as low as I could take them without bursting from laughter… but your so serious about it, barely self conscious of it. Took you a whike to suspect my replies were not serious. Now your Mr. Dignified Authority Figure… but kack all substance. I look at you old posts, I see hijinks like this from you. Your rather useless in bith history and philosophy. Your only skillset is bluffing and demanding moderator intervention.
That thread, acvording to WW2 Angry, was one of the two worst threads on the site up to that date. In regards to your question about what hapoened to this site… I would have to say Matty cried wolf, then dropped the ball. This thread I found is a good candidate for wgen the mods finally gave up with the games played by guys like you. None of you, in all your claims to him being backwards or list or nit presenting a valud question… failed utterly to even see what ge was stating, giving him a proper reply in return. I gave one nearly a decade later, one you couldn’t. That is the difference between posters then and now… it is more chaotic, rebellion prone, and sloppy now… but we can also post far more intelligently, indepth.
The older posters couldn’t do this. Your the old order. Im the new. Changing of the guard… we require knowledge and insight these days, not getting moderators to enforce a discussion to accept your outlook.
It is probably better K if you take the actual set of making a statement relative to the link, instead of just pretending you are. It will be easier to respond meaningfully to you if you do. I posted it, so read it. Nothing in your two posts actually suggest you read it, for you literally could of written that for any post on this site with a link in it… it lacks anything resembling substance in it.
