How H. G. Wells, A. Huxley, G. Orwell Saw the Social Future.

Or they will die out.

Orwell studied totalitarianism, especially communism, also in terms of forgetting. He did not yet know the technical possibilities that exist today, but he was already betting that people’s memory would be taken away by communism, which he himself experienced at times (he was temporarily a communist himself).

As for the criticism of modern technology, let us recall Heidegger:

“Only a God can save us.” - Martin Heidegger.

“The humans will only be used in the way they are needed.” - Martin Heidegger.

So, if they will not be needed at all anymore, then … (see above).

Aldous Huxley Interviewed by Mike Wallace - 1958

Amazing predictive of exactly what is happening today - and why he believed it.

Most all were reacting to the body politic described by Marx and and Nietzche. In fact the whole structural construct that befell the ambigous emergence of the trouble that Mattered the duplex ambiguity of dialectical materialism - befelled hundreds of millions, in that de-facto difference with idealized absolute space.

Therefore the digital rhetoric , formerly dual interpretation needed real teeth to chew the opposing

And maybe, this is indeed what the gods consider near twilight.

Steven King’s shining takes the father to some relationship to basic level of induced hubris for the sake of pressureacting long forgotten ideals.with the son, 'for his own sake?

.is it retarded to do philosophy as it should, rather then keeping up with the newest trends marked as 'discoveries? That’s another iffy tossup.

[list]Aldous Huxley as Narrator[/list:u]
[list]The Globalist’s New World Order[/list:u]

Not sure if you are a globalist?

Here’s how to tell:

Are you a member of the Coalition of Truth?


Then you are a globalist.

Not only that, but you are being observed. Think KGB.

Also, another clue revolves around how you react to this:

“Though often tempted to encourage a dog to distinguish color I refuse to argue with him about it”

It’s said only those who are ranking members of COT grasp the significance of this. And, curiously enough, not just philosophically.

You are misinformed. High finance has only become more regulated with time, this trend has been steady and continuous. It is this regulation which assures it stays in the hands of those who already have the hundreds of millions of dollars required to comply with the regulations, and the friendships with other high power individuals required to make those hundreds of millions go the distance.

Regulation is what powerful people use to fence out potential competitors.

Regulation is also now magically what people that don’t know anything about finance demand more and more, in fact are convinced is the only obvious thing to do.

What better way to monopolize power than to ban competition?

You should do some serious study of the financial world, and the history of legislation concerning regulation, before you espouse an opinion like this.

And, if the information you do believe you have happens to coincide with any headline ever, be suspicious of your own self, and do serious research.

Take care that your opinions on finance are based on rigorous study, and not on a vague feeling that things are “out of control.”

That feeling is the only one that people who have the most basic skill in propaganda and proper funding to broadcast it in volume require to get you to go along with anything they desire, regardless of how you feel about them personally.

K: I would add to this, if you are not a COT, then you are by definition, a communist…
a traitor to America, a Liberal… which in conservative speak is the same thing
as being a traitor… a terrorist… to be a Member of the COT… is to be an American,
but that there is a funny thing, Observe isn’t actually an American…
just as UR isn’t actually an American and as Pedreeo seems to be a member of the
COT, I am guessing he isn’t American either… Someone mentioned Venezuela…
so, once again, not native Americans declaring actual American’s as being…

“traitors” “Liberals” “Terrorist” a “Communist”

I wonder how that works?

as everyone seems to have me on Ignore, I may never know… :flags-usa:
as an actual American, you know…


so according to the COT…non natives people can tell actual Americans
what they are, you know, as Americans… So I guess we can
have blind people tell us about the painting “Guernica”, what it looks like
and the form the painting takes compared to an earlier painting of Picasso… say,
Les Demoiselles d’Avignon…

or have an stupid person explain the two theories of Relativity to us…
using the math as well…

I wonder how that is going to work? you know, as an Actual American…
having non American’s telling me how to be an American…


@ Pedro I Rengel.

Thank you for your self-description. It shows very clearly that and how much you are brainwashed.

High finance cannot be reprimanded by anyone (except itself) because it has ensured by legal means that no one but itself can prohibit it from doing anything. For example, hedge funds used to be banned, but today the most influential banks are hedge funds themselves. The gigantic bubbles of high finance have no future anymore. They are threatening to burst. Some of them already burst not long ago. So high finance has long since found other ways to expand its power.

Staggering, I am taken aback by your intellectual acumen.

Thank you.

Also, you clearly don’t know anything about high finance and just repeat stupid shit you hear.

As is your right.

As I said before, you only ever describe yourself.

Who among the many, many more powerful people than you told you to do that?

Your “big brother” of high finance?

Have you ever thought of posing this question on another Forum?
Perhaps one with a better class of poster?